![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21 Dec 2005 22:29:31 -0800, "
wrote: Scott Seidman wrote: That's why this latest move of the Admin to bypass the Court might just be their downfall. I think this is gonna get a whole lot worse for them, and I doubt it will get better before these guys are out of office. I doubt it, Scott: the right wing will convince the public that no God-fearing law-abiding US citizen has anything to fear from this and it is only the bad guys who are being monitored. I worked for NSA (while in the navy) for 20 years. I was stationed at Ft. Meade, MD for two of those years. NSA could tap into the phones of just about anyone, but analyzing the "product" would take years. It is just not feasible to monitor law abiding US citizens. And for what reason? Intercepting product is not the problem; analyzing it is. I doubt you can name me one law abiding citizen in the U.S. that has been a target of the NSA. And, pray tell, why would they monitor your communications, or mine ftm? But, if they have a handful, say 30, of known/suspected el Qaeda operatives receiving calls from overseas, they would be foolish NOT to intercept them. Of course it is a mute subject now because of the NY Times article. Dave (who has forgotten more about intercept operations than you will ever know) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|