![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Dec 2006 20:16:27 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote: wrote in news:qum0o2975niv3nl54pu7e5gbraqs7d6e8d@ 4ax.com: That said, I agree that people should be "taught" about both, as well as about religion. Exactly. Children should learn about evolution in science class, and about intelligent design in whichever class they learn about Apollo dragging the sun across the sky with his chariot. The major things I find wrong with intelligent design are A: it implies a designer. Okay. Wouldn't that equate with a god or committee of gods? Spooky. And then there's B: where this intelligent design leads. Are we what it was supposed to lead to? The absolute best that this god / these gods could come up with over billions of years? Not very good at their work, in that case. Or do we have to pull back our egos and admit that there are stages and stages to go and we aren't the top of it all? I can't see most humans, much less the very religious who back intelligent design being willing to do that. I can't say I'm in favour of either A or B. I'll go with evolution for $50, Bob. -- r.bc: vixen Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher, etc.. Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless. Really. http://www.visi.com/~cyli |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Osama Bin Ladin Found Hanged | Ken Fortenberry | Fly Fishing | 2 | September 6th, 2004 12:30 AM |