![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Daniel-San" (Rot13) wrote in message t... "Opus" wrote... [snip test questions] First off, I ain't gotta clue as to which way to go with these questions, though I do like Frank's channelling of Rodney Dangerfield from "Back to School." Probably the practical answer. Anyway, what struck me more is the specificity of the questions. While certainly there are multiple "right" answers (so long as they are well argued) it seems that there is a general tack one must take to get the questions correct. Am I wrong on that? No, I assume the professors are looking to see if we can apply previous learning to currrent teachings, as well as, form coherent and logical responses to their test questions. I will futher assume that the grading of these test will be of both a objective and subjective nature, as we must include certain information gleaned from our class-time and readings, and they can tear us new assholes if we cannot write well enough to suit them personally. In my field the exams (PhD qualification exams) are much more open-ended. A hypothetical might be: _____ "Historian Herbert G. Gutman has argued that as the American working class formed in the period of time commonly known as the "Progressive Era," these people relied upon a shared, pre-industrial culture to guide and support them through the changes and travails of industrialization. Discuss this idea critically, acknowledging supporters, detractors and implications." _____ There are no right answers here. The purpose (other than of course a professionalizing "rite-of-passage") is to prove that you can regurgitate the arguments of many different historians in a short time frame (these exams are typically 90 minutes with a pencil in a small room -- makes it easier to stab yourself in the neck if you don't have an answer.) The faculty then break out the Rosetta Stone to decipher your chickenscratch and then decide if you know enough about the field to "qualify" to move on to write your diss. It's a strange process. Sounds as though the grading at the PhD level is entirely subjective :~^ ( Maybe I'll find out for myself one day........................................Maybe Not? Op Anyway, thanks for posting the questions. Very interesting. And good luck... Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dubbing and Term Questions | Skip Summer | Fly Fishing Tying | 2 | March 16th, 2004 06:13 PM |