Disaster and partial compensation

Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Mike wrote:
snip
You aren´t going to abuse anybody on here with impunity ever again
Kenny boy.
Can I call 'em or can I call 'em ? This meltdown is *spectacular* !!
Spectacular and hilarious to boot.

Oh by the way, if you really are writing all this nonsense while
stone cold sober I suggest you calm down, pour yourself a stiff
drink and reread some of what you've posted.

But having satisfied my own sense of propriety with that suggestion,
please, do carry on.

Still far too weak Kenny boy, everybody reading this knows I am
neither drunk nor in a "melt down" as you put it. Most of them also
know I am merely telling the truth, and they are waiting on the
sidelines to see how it all turns out. Maybe some are even laughing
about it. I´m not laughing Kenny boy, and neither are you. Where are
your "lol´s" and other bull****? Your silly tactics, your lying
propaganda? have you given up already Kenny boy?

Not only a lying sack of totally inadequate ****, but a coward to boot
eh?

Come on Kenny boy, you are going to have to do much better than that.
But you can ´t can you? Because you are just a totally inadequate
piece of worthless ****.

All this invective will hurt your cause of action against RDean
you know. When authorities investigate abuse complaints on Usenet
newsgroups they look at the posts of the accuser as well as those
of the accused. You're toast.

And it seems odd to me that a guy who just last month couldn't afford
to feed himself because he lost $2-$300 in an eBay deal gone bad
now has the resources to consult a solicitor over a Usenet post.

You don't pass the smell test, Your Loony Mikeness.

--
Ken Fortenberry