He was a good dog

On 3 Nov, 23:09, "Bob Weinberger"
wrote:
"Mike" wrote in message

oups.com...

On 3 Nov, 20:30, "Bob Weinberger"
wrote:
Mike,

snip

However, in my view, his worst trait is his
hypocracy - he professes to abhor behavior and speach that may be hurtful
to
"oppressed" minorities (gays, native americans, people of african
descent,
etc.) while having no reservation in harassing and ridiculing the
obviously
mentally disturbed.

Bob Weinberger

I suppose you think that is remarkably witty and funny?

I really do sincerely hope that somebody like Fortenberry causes you
the maximum possible grief and upset, and that there is nobody there
with the guts to say or do anything about it.

Maybe some **** like you will also find it funny, and make a point of
telling you so?

MC

Sure, part of my intent was to be somewhat witty, but my stronger motive
was to jab Ken over what I perceive to be his hypocrisy on this point. If
he truly believes that you are mentally imbalanced (a conclusion that many
of us who have read your outbursts on this thread have also reached); to be
consistent with his proclaimed championship of the opressed, he should leave
you alone. I on the other hand make no pretense that I owe any "opressed"
group any more consideration than I do anyone else. Therefore I see no
hypocrisy in my pointing out to you (even knowing that it will have no
positive impact) that your actions in this (and several other similar)
thread(s) shout out MENTAL IMBALANCE.

Bob Weinberger

As you are doubtless perfectly well aware, he does not believe
anything of the sort, he is merely trying to find ways of attacking
me, or of gaining support for his nonsense, and that is all he can
come up with.

Quite remarkable that you consider Fortenberry and LaCourse´s actions
"normal" and mine to be a sign of mental imbalance. You think it´s
normal for people to castigate others in this manner? Call somebody a
Nazi, a homo, and a host of other things? Other people´s wives and
daughters ****s? A whole list of other misdeeds far too numerous to
mention?

Because if you do, you are deranged.

He does not care about gays either, as if he did he would not use
homosexuality as an insult. The same applies to racism and nazis. The
man is a disgraceful ****bag with a severe inferiority complex. He
MUST have his views accepted, no matter what, and he will go to any
lengths to try and ensure that.

I am not in the least mentally imbalanced. I am merely taking steps to
defend myself, and others. When you are the butt of such attacks, then
you might just possibly obtain a different perspective on the matter.
Maintaining that I am mentally imbalanced, in order to make a joke,
regardless of the effect it might have on me, is the action of an
unprincipled ****. If you truly believe I am mentally unbalanced, and
even more so if you do not. It also supports Fortenberry in his
endeavours, the man is an emotional vamnpire who feeds on just such
crap, and it encourages him to continue.

Would you care to tell me who "many of us" are? Indeed, can you find
anybody apart from the ******s involved in this crap, who will support
you in your claims that I am mentally imbalanced? Because if you can
´t you are not only an unprincipled ****, but a liar to boot.

I could go on, but there would not be much point would there?

Even if this whole collection of individuals, ( it´s not a group as
such) maintains that I am completely insanse, that does not make it
so. Even if the whole lot were to oppose me, it would also make no
difference, for the simple reason that I am right, I am within my
rights, and it is a matter of principle. Unlike you, I have some.

It does not really matter all that much what you believe or don´t
believe, it does not affect me or my actions There is also absolutely
nothing you can do about it. I will continue to defend myself, and I
don´t much care what you do. I merely thought it prudent to point out
what I think of you, as a result of your actions, and to paraphrase
something I heard recently "( even knowing that it will [most likely]
have no positive impact)".

You will of course note that I have not called you any silly names,
referred to your family or antecedents, or castigated you in any way.
I merely addressed the matter at hand, in a perfectly sane and civil
fashion, in direct reply to a post you addressed to me.

MC