So, OK, he's for change, he gives Chris Mathews a feeling "up his leg," and...

wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:04:11 -0500, Jeff wrote:


wrote:



......there's more, but i suspect these will be sufficient for
your critique and counterpoints.


Look, I'm willing to give the man a chance if someone is willing to give
me a rational, objective reason as to why I should...

TC,
R

youth, intelligence, tolerance, gifted, persuasive, redemptive,
inspiring, unifying, empowering, thoughtful/insightful, problem-solving
skills, hope, hope, hope, symbolic power, listens, collaborative,
notbush, nothillaryclinton, notmccain, respect for balance of powers in
federal system, adapts and adjusts effectively, small government/big
government experience in elected office, understands/recognizes racial
and socioeconomic problems from a unique perspective, not a washington
dc insider, objective...

it's clear you want something specific in terms of qualification or
ability, but seem unwilling to accept this guy is capable of doing the
job. mccain meets your criteria? hillary? there are 3 choices
available. who do you choose? why? what compels, inspires or persuades
your vote? give us your rational, objective reason.

assuming you could pick the one living person who you believe is the
one, among all others, who meets your criteria...who is it??