![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "salmobytes" wrote in message . .. notbob wrote: "The only difference between the Democrats and the Repulicans is: The Democrats will take you money and give it to those who have not earned it. The Repulicans will take your money and keep it for themselves." --nb This is a false argument. Yes, democrats do care about social justice. The putative philosophical underpinnings of the Democratic party are commendable but they have little to do with the reality of party leadership or power brokerage (which is to say, politics) on a national level. Whatever may have been the case in bygone eras (and this is still a contentious matter in history, subject to repeated revision), the fact is that the sole objective of the major political parties in the U.S. (and presumably elsewhere) and the major players within those parties is to win elections and gain and/or retain and consolidate power. It is a perhaps unfortunate fact that the voting public pretty much universally align themselves with one or the other of the two major parties and will, for the foreseeable future, continue to do so despite the fact that neither shows much indication of living up to the ideals they espouse. Despite the frothings of a certain damaged individual of our acquaintance, the underlying cause of all this purblind idiocy is a nearly universal refusal to adhere to anything resembling an ideology. They'd like (among other things) to try to end poverty and ignorance using education, and yes, even to spend a little money to alleviate real misery. But the *amounts* of money spent on social welfare, over the years, is a pittance. During the cold war years the R's used to wine piteously about all the money we were wasting on "foreign aid." But we hardly spent a nickel on any real aid. We spent all the money on arms, propping up anti-communist dictators all over the world. We're still paying a price for that, in Afganistan, Guatemala and all over Africa. The real spending, since the Viet Nam war, has always occurred during R presidencies. But it all went to the military industrial corporations and the oil companies (run by R's). They're the ones who increase spending, usually accompanied by simultaneous tax cuts. They don't like to pay the rent, it seems. Yeah, all that is true. Wolfgang |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dumb redfish question | Ken Fortenberry[_2_] | Fly Fishing | 4 | April 23rd, 2008 11:16 PM |
Dumb oakies | Mike[_6_] | Fly Fishing | 6 | November 15th, 2007 06:55 AM |
Dumb oakies | Mike[_6_] | Fly Fishing | 0 | November 14th, 2007 09:24 PM |
dumb laws | rw | Fly Fishing | 16 | May 27th, 2005 11:52 PM |
$60 Dumb Mistake | RGarri7470 | Bass Fishing | 4 | February 11th, 2004 03:05 AM |