![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 4, 7:37*am, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 06:27:25 -0700 (PDT), " wrote: On Sep 4, 6:07*am, jeff wrote: wrote: OK, do I post the obvious: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA or do I post the less-so: She was back at the bar, showered, dressed, and halfway into drinks and dinner when the ball finally hit the ground...after going straight over the mound and somewhere WAY past the lights... Seriously, with a couple of missteps, Palin, if she holds, may well have outspeeched Obama in even his most ardent fans' dreams. *At the very least, Biden better not be sleeping. Boys, and I use that term VERY loosely, we gots us a horserace, R ...and I can hardly wait to hear the Tel slams... a bit shrill...but well-delivered. of course, reports are it was written entirely by others and she was taught how to deliver it in a 6+ hour session. still, she had to stand up there and make it true...and i think she did well in talking to her choir. she seems sturdy. i look forward to seeing her without her puppetmasters...that will be the real test. but, i agree...it's going to be interesting and close. jeff (still...i missed the black leather boots...perhaps she has a tatoo and a special piercing??) I'm not usually one to throw up the sexist card, but..... Given that Obama's only reason for being nominated is his speech- making ability it feels odd to hear Palin denigrated for her speech-making ability. Well, fair's fair - she's no Halle Berry... Full-disclosure, I didn't actually see/hear/read either Obama or Palin's speeches, I'm far more interested in their substance than how they can read from a teleprompter. Um...OK. *I'm curious - do you prefer to base your substance-of-the-candidate decision more on the spew from Rush, et al or Huffingtonpost, et al...? I prefer looking at past behavior.....which is difficult because in this case one candidate hasn't done anything. Generally I look at who has been closest to the center before they started campaigning for President. This should make me an obvious McCain voter. Unfortunately he's been trying to make up to the far-right ever since 2000 and that's making me sick to my stomach. Picking an anti-abortion person for VP may push me completely over the edge. Still not sure I can vote for Obama since he's a completely unknown/inexperienced quantity and seems totally naive (read: way too far left) for my tastes. Looks like I'm leaning towards throwing my vote away again to a 3rd party candidate. - Ken |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|