Well, now...

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:59:59 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Sep 4, 7:37*am, wrote:

She is on tape gushing over all the earmarked pork she got with the
help of Rep. Young (Indited) and Sen Stevens (On trial). And its a
matter of record that she did not turn back the $217 million pork pie
of Federal taxpayer money for the bridge to no-whe Fact, She kept
it and distributed to her own set of pork projects. Facts that the
vetting team did not get to the speech writing team in time to cut
from the speech. :

@)))))) What a TV ad that is going to make.

Yeah - boring. I'm not talking about reality or truth, I'm talking
about what the very small relative number of voters who are gonna decide
thing are going to believe (and/or want to believe). And 217 mil of
pork that she didn't initiate and came out of Congress isn't gonna make
one iota of difference. Heck, McCain, Obama, and Biden are more
responsible for it than she is, and "THE FACT" (cue music) that she took
what fell into her lap and spent on her state isn't going to get too
many folks all a-tizzy. Yet another thing the Dems, with two Senators
on the ticket, need to be VERY careful about shouting from the rooftops.
IAC, the Dems put up some shtick about pork and bridges and Alaskan
Senators and house remodels and the GOP puts up pictures of her and her
family and Cindy McCain, and the heartland of the US, where corn and
farm subsidies pay for vacations, votes Sarah/Cindy '08...and oh, yeah,
for that old guy, whathisname, the war hero dude, too...

Remember Richard, its not
only Texans who have trouble with that veracity thingy.

Right. It's most all politicians and "liberals"...

Dave

HTH,
R