A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hauling, Rod-loading.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old November 10th, 2008, 08:06 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 187
Default Hauling, Rod-loading.

rb608 wrote:
On Nov 10, 1:35 pm, "
wrote:
Whether the mathematical model is entirely accurate, I am no longer
sure. I will have to check it again.


I believe the magnitude of the air resistance to be relatively
inconsequential to the casting mechanics (though on a windy day, it's
effect is undeniable afterward), so with your permission, I'll leave
it out for simplicity. That makes your equation to be:

Frt = Fi * Fa * Flt

It's my contention, however, the the force terms should be grouped,
and that the unbalanced force causing the line acceleration is
actually (Frt - Flt). This allows your model to fit into the F=ma
equation as:

(Frt - Flt) = Fi * Fa

I don't think that's a great deal different than you were describing
it verbally; but it *is* a great deal more accurate as a physics
equation.


The units issue I mentioned is manifest in this series of equations
from your post:

30g * 1m/sē * 0.3 = Flt / 0.01kgm/sē

30g * 1msē = 0,03kgm/sē

* 0,3 = 0.09 kgm/sē

Note that between the first and second equations, you simply discarded
the kg.m/sē units in the demoninator, using only the same units that
go with the Flt force in the numerator. Had you retained those units
as you should have, the numerator and denominator units would cancel
and you'd have ended up with no units at all on the right side, but
g.m/sē on the left.


Indeed, I think you are correct. Seems I made another mistake copying
this stuff over, and I am still having trouble with the mathematical
model. I will have to check the originals and see if I made the same
mistake there. otherwise somebody would have picked up on it.
Or maybe they just read the theory and ignored the faulty equations?



(Frt - Flt) = Fi * Fa

= (0,01kgm/sē - Flt) = 0,03kg * 1m/sē


I am going to try and graph it with the data I have.

Thanks a lot for that, it seems to be correct, and agrees with some
other actual data I have. I am still not entirely sure it is correct,
but it seems to make sense.

My apologies for being somewhat short with you, I am rather inured to
some things by now, and they colour bo9th my judgement and my reactions.

TL
MC





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hauling, Rod-loading. [email protected] Fly Fishing 103 November 14th, 2008 04:00 PM
Hauling, Rod-loading. rb608 Fly Fishing 7 November 12th, 2008 08:47 AM
Hauling, Rod-loading. rb608 Fly Fishing 1 November 10th, 2008 10:55 PM
Hauling on the foward cast? [email protected] Fly Fishing 16 September 20th, 2007 11:40 PM
Loading new line Mike Keown General Discussion 10 October 27th, 2003 12:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.