![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 23:00:03 -0700 (PDT), DaveS wrote:
On Apr 8, 9:36*pm, wrote: Here we are, less that 100 days out and Richard, you are batting, what? about .87. Wow. Hardly missed a beat. Most days something new. Obama picked his nose wrong. Obama appointed the wrong person. etc etc. Recession? Obama's not handling it right. What do you think of Obama's choice of dog? We are all ears. When are we going to get your take on Michelle's upper arm strength? How about Obama's choice of ties? I think you're much more suited to that type of critique. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that you and Beanie are perfectly suited to engage in a "Point/Counterpoint" type of thing on such weighty matters as Obama's snot, ties, and pets... This day after day **** is creepy. But I think I may understand it yet. See, year after year, you defended tooth and nail a man in active contention for the "worst President in history" title. You slaved in that vineyard, with some of the most bizarre reasoning ever seen on this site. Wow, I did? Damndest thing, but I cannot remember ever typing or uttering anything that might even be twisted into suggesting that I thought Bush was anything other than, at best, an average POTUS of slightly above-average intelligence. And how were you rewarded? With incompetence, theivery, corruption and bad ju ju. Oh, wait - which of the last 44, including this one, are you talking about...? But still you toiled on. Oh on occasion you denied you cared. But you did care. And so for two full terms G.W.Bush and you, Cheney and you, Dennis and Tommy and you, brothers in the cause. Ah, OK, so it is Bush... Wrong on EVERY prediction, WRONG on every choice. Not wrong via debate; Wrong by virtue of fact. Never could get a break but . . . Faithful till the end. Ya gotta love your obviously-blind hypocrisy... Not a pretty sight to see an obviously intelligent man, who so loved this unrewarding and bankrupt political team, to be so committed that he prostrated himself in abject loyalty in the face of incompetence and corruption. It must have been really difficult. Not at all...in fact, one would be correct in saying that I've dealt with it as if it never even happened... But happy days are here. Absolutely - you jumped the shark many years ago... Now your team can go back to what they are good at; harassment. I watched Hannity last night. I didn't - it was sorta like, well, every other night he's on...um, you do mean on TV, right...? What a martinet. Um, a "martinet," Gracie? Hang on, you don't actually mean to say "martian" or "maraschino" or "canard a l'orange" or something, do you...? But it gave me an insight into what Obama evokes in wingnuts; Clearly, Obama's superior intelligence, leadership, and masterful speaking style Hey, I've acknowledged the latter (at least insofar as his speech-making ability) since he first came upon the scene...thus far, however, the jury is still out on the former two...and I particularly note that you, like many other blind devotees, never brag about his alleged common sense... just drives folks of the bankrupt persuasion crazy. Change is what America voted for and change is what is happening. Nope. "America" didn't vote for jack ****, but what most of those in the US who voted for "change" really voted for was getting their own way, just like most of those who voted for McCain, Bush (in 2000, not 2004), Kerry, Gore, Clinton (in 92, not 96), etc., etc., etc. Dave HTH, R |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|