A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Yeah, this'll end well...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3  
Old July 11th, 2009, 02:58 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,901
Default Yeah, this'll end well...

On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:40:56 GMT, "Tom Littleton" wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
Maybe they can get FEMA and the SEC to manage it...

Sheesh,
R



well, since we seem to at least being on our way toward a competent FEMA(all
bets off on an SEC that could miss Madoff for 10 years), why not??
Seriously, though, does your beef with this go beyond a distaste for
government loan programs? Hell, they are getting the TARP money back now,
why not plow it into other areas of the economy?
Tom

shirley - you jest. FEMA is not on it's way to competency and it will never be
"competent," no matter who is the Oval Office. It wasn't "competent" under
Bush, Clinton, etc., and it's isn't and won't be under Him, either. It cannot be
"competent" because it's run by bureaucrats. To paraphrase, setting up a
bureaucracy whose sole purpose is to put itself out of business is lunacy. You
are still helping me and every other US taxpayer pay for Katrina victims'
housing. It's ****in' 2009, for God's sake. I'm down here, I know what
happened and I know how bad it was, but geezusmaryonapony, 4 years?!?

As to TARP, let's see if I understand your rational: we "lent" money to banks
who either, 1., didn't want the money, or, 2., got their tits in a wringer
because of stupid business practices, and now, the ones who didn't want it in
the first place are being _allowed_ to return it, so the taxpayer lucked out on
that one. But now, "we" should take the money "we" miraculously got back and
give it to folks who don't qualify for loans, but want to start small
businesses, or worse, keep failing small businesses alive. Uh, OK. Lessee
businesses that need loans...hmmm...AHA!...they need to find bartenders and
cocktail waitresses who make 30K a year, have no experience whatsoever in
anything remotely related to construction but saw a 3-year-old episode of "****
Up this House Flip," and lend them about a mil each. They can go buy 2-3
trashed-out MacMansions at the foreclosure sale, fix 'em up and flip 'em to
folks who, if they don't eat for 2 weeks out of each month and send Citibank the
minimum on the Visa bill (run up buying plasma TVs, Tommy Pullmyfinger shirts,
and Frappamochachinos...), they'll be able to afford at least a few months of
payments. The flippers can and will use the profits to go buy 87" wheels and
tires and 17 TVs for the brand spankin' new Tahoe, courtesy of GMAC and
TimmyBama. And when the flipped house and the Tahoe get repo'ed in 6 months,
the process can start all over. That'll help solve the foreclosure problem AND
fix the auto industry....

And you want to frost that ****cake with the bureaucracy that will be needed to
administer THAT? Hey, banks ARE lending to "small businesses," they just aren't
throwing money at anyone who can fog up a mirror anymore. Finally. And aren't
lots of "experts" currently all wrapped around the axle about how the credit
card companies/consumer debt is the "next shoe?" So it seems like a good idea
to you to give these same ****ups - i.e., "consumers" - seed money to start, or
prop up, a "business?" Hey, if the business was creditworthy, some bank
somewhere would be falling over itself to lend that business money, because
that's a large part of how sensible banks make sensible profit - they lend money
to credit-worthy businesses and individuals.

TC,
R
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Big Y Fly Co, yeah or nay? JD[_4_] Fly Fishing 7 January 10th, 2009 08:04 AM
Unbelievable...Oh, yeah, it's OT as hell... [email protected] Fly Fishing 27 March 22nd, 2007 05:13 PM
Uhhh, well, yeah, but it ain't against the law or nothin'.... [email protected] Fly Fishing 2 February 3rd, 2006 01:04 PM
Test (yeah, I know) riverman Fly Fishing 0 January 2nd, 2006 09:13 AM
OT - YEAH!!! Craig Bass Fishing 6 January 8th, 2004 09:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.