![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message 200909191912368930-dplacourse@aolcom, David LaCourse
writes On 2009-09-19 15:52:39 -0400, Todd said: Bill Grey wrote: In message , Todd writes Bill Grey wrote: While you guys are still chewing the fat, I went fishing yesterday only the second time this year. It was to a small put and take fishery fishing for stocked Rainbow trout. Fishing with a stiff NE wind blowing from behind me, I managed to bag 4 Rainbows the largest was just over 4 lbs and the total bag weighed 15 lbs. They were caught on a small (by our standards Montana nymph.) Awesome! What size and style of hook did you use? I'm not sure - it was a fly that's been in my box for a few years. Probably size 12 . I'm not sure how this relates to your idea of hook sizes. We tend to tie flies on larger hooks when fishing for stocked Rainbows. Actually, hook and shank. My "theory" is that a trout will stray farther from his feeding lie based on the food value of what he is chasing. In other words, if the fly is bigger, you don't have to be such a good shot. If the fly is smaller, say a midge, you have to hit the trout on the nose to get him to eat it. My "theory". Nonsense. When I nymph on my home waters in Maine, I usually use nymphs in the 18 - 24 range, and I am VERY successful with wild salmon and brook trout. There is one caddis pupua I use that is a size 16, but that is as large as I would go. Rarely have I seen anyone using something as large as a size 12 except if they are mimicing a dry March Brown or a stonefly. Roll over some rocks at the stream you fish and look at how small the nymphs are. Most are smaller than 16s. My theory is give them something small they've never seen. I have about 5 personally invented flies, none of them larger than 18, and they all work. I sight fished a big rainbow on the Big Horn one time. I used big flies, small flies, and very tiny flies. I was determined to catch this fish. I watched him move aside to avoid the fly. *Finally* I put on something that he wanted - a size 20 tied by a friend, and the big rainbow took it. There was nothing different in the drift - he just wanted that particular lure. The same thing happened in Labrador with one of my grandsons, only this time it was a dry fly. We both saw the fish finning in an eddy and drifted dry flies past it. It ignored every fly - two from my grandson and two from me, all size 16. We must have each made four or five casts with each fly. I gave my grandson a size 18 black Goddard Caddis on the first cast, we saw the fish move up and away to take the lure. It was a five pound brook trout. Dave In an attempt to clarify, even justify, the hook size I used, let me refer you to:- http://www.jannsnetcraft.com/Content...zing_chart.pdf then on page 5 see size 10 Sproat hook. That seems to compare well with my fly. It must be remembered that my fly is a lure not a representation of a natural. I'm not sue if there is difference in classification of hook sizes between the USA and the UK ? -- Bill Grey |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Researchers Say Rules That Allow Only Catching of Larger Fish May Leave Slower, Timid Fish | George | Fishing Photos | 0 | February 26th, 2008 01:52 AM |
Scientific Research confirms that fish feel pain: INTENSIVE FISH FARMING | John | UK Coarse Fishing | 7 | October 7th, 2003 03:00 PM |
Scientific Research confirms that fish feel pain: INTENSIVE FISH FARMING | John | General Discussion | 3 | October 6th, 2003 09:50 PM |
Scientific Research confirms that fish feel pain: INTENSIVE FISH FARMING | John | UK Sea Fishing | 3 | October 6th, 2003 09:50 PM |
Scientific Research confirms that fish feel pain: INTENSIVE FISH FARMING | John | Fishing in Canada | 3 | October 6th, 2003 09:50 PM |