"the" movie ...years later ... review

On Dec 18, 3:55*am, DaveS wrote:
On Dec 17, 9:12*pm, Giles wrote:





On Dec 17, 9:27*pm, DaveS wrote:

On Dec 17, 11:51*am, Larry L wrote:

Well, I tend to run a little behind, I admit.

Last night I finally gave into boredom to the point of watching a DVD
of "A River Runs Through It" that was given to me several years ago..
I had never seen it before, or read the book ( I have it too, a gift )

After years of hearing others blaming this movie for an upsurge in fly
fishing fad I expected something entirely different ... relative to
fly fishing.

Honestly I didn't see a single thing that would make ME want to fly
fish if I didn't already. * *And as for visiting Montana, this movie
shows much of it's worst side, imho. * *Although not to the extent
portrayed, at this point in time, Montana does have deep rooted "get
drunk and fight for lack of anything else to do" cultural
problems.... *that are far less than appealing.

There are also many 'geographical' irregularities in the movie ...
distances covered by Model A in a blink that are a long drive even
today, in reality. * I'd give the movie both thumbs down

Any Way .... I think that the FFing fad we went through either had
it's roots elsewhere than "the movie" OR our culture is even more
desperate for something real to cling to than even I believe it to be.

Boy I don't know. I really liked the film and still can picture
different scenes. Particularly the obsessed hunting quality of the
journalist brother's fishing style. Also the portrayal of the
famdamily and the bro's family, *those ARE like some of the Western
folk like when I came out from NJ. And the bar in Helena? dead on. Did
the Lolo stuff put you off? Yeah there were scary people like that.
Still probably are *out on the edge.

The edge of lawlessness? . . . reminded me of Park City when the main
business was still the mine and the 30 cars of high grade shipped out
each week. Where you could work the mine if you couldn't make tuition
for a semester. Smoke a joint and no one cared, the ski lodge just
barely making it and Ziggy (keep the knives away from him) Vet of the
10th Mountain division soaking out his old bones and gin in the
communal tubs at the ex-whorehouse we all holed up in. Pop Jencks for
ice cream, and a decent doc in the dispensary if he was sober.

*I loved that film and should rent it this weekend. It reflected
accurately I feel the unapologetic West I fled to after each winter
week of classes at BYU. And the truth be told, these people were not
that different than the working people I grew up with, several of whom
died too early like the one brother and a very few who went on to
edamucated middle class respectability like the other brother.

I have no idea why that movie was so popular with yuppies. I do know
that Redford has a real feel for the inter-mountain West. I loved
"downhill skier" too.

Dave

That movie was popular with yuppies because it was the time of
yuppies. *Post adolescent males have always been suckers for a good
romance......and it was that in spades.....or even a bad one. *Norman
Maclean was not a prolific author but he had a keen sense of romance.
He wrote a very good story and Redford made a very good movie out of
it......notwithstanding the objections of a proud confessed sociopath.

As for the abject nonsense about "the movie" ruining fly fishing by
bringing hordes money dripping idiots out into the streams......well,
abject nonsense is the stuff on which the bulk of human wisdom is
built. *Money dripping idiots have been flitting about from one thing
to another since time immemorial. *Anybody here ever read Fitzgerald?
Twain? *Hemingway? *Shakespeare? *Chaucer?

You want someone with a real feel for the west, try DeVoto.

giles- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We've agreed on this before, DeVoto d' man.

Can't be helped.....it's bound happen from time to time despite our
best efforts.

Way ahead of his time. I
understand that the Southesk collection of that Scotsman Earl (who
Devoto speaks of when he writes about the Fur companies) has been
purchased by the Royal Alberta Museaum. This stuff was collected on
the Northern Plains in the 1850s and has not been shown in North
America before. DeVoto got some unique and early insights from the
artist that traveled with the Earl including evidence of the
transformation of some Eastern tribes, into plains horse people.
(Lennie lenape)

The only work of DeVoto's I have at hand is "The Western Paradox: A
Conservation Reader." A hasty perusal of the index (interrupted by
several delicious forays into the body of the text) reveals no mention
of Carnegie, let alone the artist who accompanied him. I don't recall
Carnegie from any other of DeVoto's works I've encountered. The Royal
Alberta Museum's website makes no reference to an artist on the trip
that I can find. Even more surprising, Carnegie himself says nothing
about an artist who accompanied him in the preface to his book,
"Saskatchewan and the Rocky Mountains" (I haven't had time to search
the whole volume)

http://books.google.com/books?id=MR8...age&q=&f=false

Moreover, in the preface he states:

"As regards the illustrations, whether on separate pages or attached
to the letterpress of the work, the greater number of these are
derived from my own sketches and drawings; the exception entirely
consisting in those which have been reproduced from photographs, or
founded on them with some slight alteration.

To the former class belong all, save one, of the illustrations of
scenery, every example of which may be relied on as a truthful though
imperfect portrayal of Nature, — notwithstanding the roughness of my
drawings, and the marvellous improvement in all artistic qualities
which they have sustained under Mr. Whymper's skilful hand.

To the latter class must be referred the various representations of
animals' heads, taken from skulls and stuffed specimens in my
possession; also several relating to other objects—viz., Red River
Fire-bags,—Cree Whip,—Edmonton Hunter's Dag,—Assiniboine Fire-bag,
Knife-sheath, and Pipe, —all of which are engraved from excellent
photographs by Mr. Rodgers, of Montrose ; and in addition to these the
view of Minnclialia Falls, by Mr. Whitney, a St. Paul photographer,
the only landscape for which my own pencil is not originally
responsible.

Most of the smaller and less elaborate illustrations belong to the
former of these classes, being facsimiles, or nearly so, of pen-and-
ink memoranda hastily sketched into my journal; the exceptions are as
follows :—Buffalo-hide Line,— Whisky, —Snow-shoe and Skida,—sketches
only recently prepared by me expressly for the present volume."

The Mr. Whymper referred to seems likely to be Edward Whymper,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Whymper

who visited the Canadian Rockies himself, 40 years or so after
Carnegie, but I can't find anything that suggests that he was with
Carnegie, and Carnegie's preface appears to suggest that Whymper's
services were rendered after the fact.

It isn't clear to me from the above text whether Mr. Rodgers was
responsible for the excellent photographs or the engravings made from
them but in either case, he too appears to have done his work in
preparing the book for publications, not in situ, as it were.

So, any idea who the artist was?

giles