![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:42:50 -0800 (PST), Larry L
wrote: On Dec 16, 3:18*pm, personaobscura wrote: On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:45:10 -0800 (PST), Larry L wrote: My kid is moving back home while he waits to head off to grad school. * In the mean time he has three jobs, two of which are as research assistants for professors and apparently require lots of time on the Internet. So, I guess we're in the market for a fast connection. * *Nothing "wired" is available out here and I'm trying to figure out the differences between "radio" and satellite wireless providers. Currently my little tray icon says 26.4 kbps and I'm also trying to get a feel for how much faster 1.5 megabyte/sec is and how that should be abbreviated ... MB/sec *MBps *mbps mb/sec etc etc. * *I thought I knew some of this stuff but it's many many years since I had any real interest in puters and my "knowledge: has evaporated. *After thumbing through 3 wireless ISP companies brochures I'm even more confused than my norm. TIA Well, the math is simple enough: if you really can achieve 1.5 Megabytes per second on a wireless WAN connection available in your location, that's nearly 500 times higher throughput than your 26.4 Kilobit dial-up connection provides. From a utility viewpoint, that's a humongous enabler. Indeed, in this era, your dialup connection is not far removed from Marconi's time wrt practicality. Just saying... I know how bad my current connection is, I've been trying years to get something done about it. I'm the last house on a dead end rural road and the phone lines are so old they actually go through trees in a couple places ( the wood has grown around the wires, over time.) The phone repair guy once told me he had never seen worse or more spliced lines BUT the phone company says they meet the minimum data transfer required by regulations ( enough for a FAX machine, apparently ) and there is no way they are going to replace a mile of line to make me happy. One thing I want to know is there an official difference between mb and MB ... are these a million bits and a million bytes and is byte 8 times the data as bit. The people on the phones seem to use "megabit" and "megabyte" interchangeably but I think that is wrong .... are most advertised speeds in bits or bytes? TIA,again A byte is officially 8 bits, Mb is the accepted notation for Megabits, and MB is Megabytes. From a utility viewpoint, throughput is most readily compared in bits per second. I don't know that there actually are any "regulations" on minimum phone line quality - or what entity would enforce them if there were any. Does the FCC give a crap about such matters - when there isn't any sort of competition to regulate in the first place? (can you pick from more than one phone company? I can't). If one wants to play keyboard commando over voice-grade lines (which only need about 2 kilohertz of bandwidth to do their job adequately) one must accept the condition of the playing field. As for "people on the phones", with remarkably few exceptions you can safely count on them all to be script-reading idiots, and no matter how little you think you know about anything, they'll know less... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
geek question | Larry L | Fly Fishing | 5 | January 12th, 2009 07:20 PM |
OT geek stuff | Larry L | Fly Fishing | 25 | March 18th, 2008 11:16 PM |
OT Need computer geek | Larry and a Cat named Dub | Fly Fishing | 3 | March 2nd, 2007 03:34 PM |
Geek Question | riverman | Fly Fishing | 6 | February 25th, 2007 01:54 PM |
GEEK TR :-D | riverman | Fly Fishing | 5 | July 15th, 2004 05:23 PM |