![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Willi" wrote I'm not too up on Latin names but supposedly the "Olives" are made up of Baetis and some other I don't remember. However, use of the two Latin names is misleading and even the common label Olives is misleading. Maybe small gray Mayfly might be better. Locally they hatch out throughout most of the year in various permutations. They range from of a size 17 down to a 26. Wing colors range from very light to very dark gray. Body color is mainly shades of gray with some olive and rust. So functionally, the name covers a wide range of bugs, whether or not the scientific name is the same or not is irrelevant, IMO. I certainly don't sit around talking Latin much, and most certainly don't use Latin to "be impressive". "PMD," for instance, is pretty universally used to mean two species that look alike and vary only in size. I'd prefer to say "size 18 PMD" than one of the Latin names, since my words will likely convey my meaning simply and without resorting to silly over complication. But, IMO, the second paragraph above is a classic example of why we "should" use Latin, at times. If you, or anyone else, says "blue winged olive" I'm given very little real information. Say I want to come fish with you and you tell me to tie up some "olives" .... without several other paragraphs to define "olive" in the current usage I don't know what size or color, do I? But, tell me Baetis tricaudatis is hatching and I'm much better informed .... or can be with some research. BTW, for years I've been urging those I know in retriever trials to standardize the language of training, for exactly the same reason. Communication ( having your meaning understood, if not agreed with ) depends on using language that is universally understood, and ( as we see so often on Usenet), the honest desire to actually communicate, as opposed to argue, or "win." Rex Carr and Mike Lardy are THE two field trial trainers of all time ( Rex, now dead, was my mentor ) and they only spent 3 days together, several years back, when Mike came out specifically to met Rex. I was the only other person there most of that three days, and at one point they bickered for 3/4 hour over a point, before agreeing to disagree, from mutual respect. The sadly amusing thing was that from the "outside" it was clear that they were using the same words (push and pull) to mean different things and that lack of standardized training language was keeping communication from happening between two greats of the activity. In a like manner, I think there are times when the Latin is useful ..... "caddis" includes both Hydropsyche and Glossosoma and both may be active on the same water at the same time ..... telling me you nailed em last night on caddis doesn't help me as much as some Latin would ( assuming we were both accurate in our use of the scientific names ) Still Green ( a grayish, rusty shade ;-), and tied fat on a big hook ... yours truly |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Some Nice Fish Caught Yesterday. | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 10 | January 13th, 2004 05:10 AM |
An afternoon in the desert - Trout | Bob La Londe | General Discussion | 5 | December 15th, 2003 02:05 PM |
Hooks and reflexes and my yesterday | Bob | Fly Fishing | 2 | November 14th, 2003 01:08 AM |
I found something yesterday that's worth a look... | Suthern Transplant | Bass Fishing | 10 | October 27th, 2003 01:33 AM |