![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg Pavlov" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 15:36:42 +0200, "Mike Connor" wrote: For a long time, most rods had two ratings marked on the butt i.e #6/#7 or similar. This was usually a manufacturers recommendation that the rod would cast a DT#6 or a WF#7. This is because a WF line of the same rating as the DT would be too light to load the rod at short range, ... I believe that it is the other way around: for longer casts one must shoot line, or shoot more line, with the WT, so it helps to have more weight in the first 30 feet. As you pointed out, for a given line weight rating, the first 30 feet should be apx the same weight whether the line is a DT or WT, so for short distances the rod loading should be the same with either. SNIP What you say is basically correct. A WF line is merely a shooting head with integrated running line, designed for long casting, and using a haul to shoot line. It will cast a lot further than a comparable DT, ( if you can use it! ![]() to boot!), and in such a case a heavier line loads the rod more easily. TL MC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reel fishermen | allen | General Discussion | 1 | April 17th, 2004 05:04 AM |
Backing advice | Aaron Hammer | Fly Fishing | 13 | January 30th, 2004 03:45 AM |
Line Snobs | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 15 | January 3rd, 2004 02:49 PM |
Good deal on great line! | schreecher | Bass Fishing | 0 | November 25th, 2003 05:08 AM |
PowerPro line | Eric | Bass Fishing | 2 | September 23rd, 2003 06:10 PM |