![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Connor wrote:
Sorry, perhaps I did not make that clear enough. There is no difference between DT and WF lines of the same rating. A WF line one rating higher than the DT is of course heavier than the DT. snip In other words, the rod-loading characteristics of a DT and a WF line (of "standard" tapers, whatever those are) at short range will be exactly the same, and any argument or rule-of-thumb one should go "up one weight" when using a WF line is bogus, at least for short range. I used to use DT lines for ordinary trout fishing, but over the past couple of years I've switched to WF lines. One reason is that the economy of the DT lines isn't a big issue when I compare it to all my other fishing expenses. A more important reason is that I sometimes want to cast long distances. In fact, I frequently want to cast long distances when fishing lakes and when fishing larger rivers where I often can't wade very close to good lies. Sometimes, especially when the fishing is very hot -- to the point of getting boring -- I just like to cast a lot of line for the hell of it, and because I'm tired of wading, and because it's more challenging. A WF line is ideal, IMO, because it works well at all ranges. It's exactly the same as a DT at short range, it shoots better than a DT at long range, and the mid-range isn't messed up by some bulky line/running-line connection. It's better than a shooting head, for my purposes, because I really dislike that transition through the guides of the line/running-line connection. I suppose that connection could be made as smooth a silk, with enough time and effort, but I can't be bothered for the puny extra $30/year or so (at the most) that my WF lines cost me. The only disadvantage besides price, as far as I can tell, is that a WF won't roll cast AT LONG DISTANCES as well as a DT. Very little of my fishing involves long-distance roll casting. Furthermore, while a WF doesn't long-distance roll cost as well as a DT, it does roll cast better than a shooting head. Finally, to the specific subject of this thread, I think a WF line would be the best choice for a beginner. After he's learned the basics of casting at short range, which will be EXACTLY THE SAME as with a DT line, he can move on to hauling and double hauling and shooting. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reel fishermen | allen | General Discussion | 1 | April 17th, 2004 05:04 AM |
Backing advice | Aaron Hammer | Fly Fishing | 13 | January 30th, 2004 03:45 AM |
Line Snobs | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 15 | January 3rd, 2004 02:49 PM |
Good deal on great line! | schreecher | Bass Fishing | 0 | November 25th, 2003 05:08 AM |
PowerPro line | Eric | Bass Fishing | 2 | September 23rd, 2003 06:10 PM |