![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sundog wrote:
snip The RPL was a fine rod I just did not like the feel, others I fished with tried it and thought it was great, it was just not my style. I have a 590-4 RPL and it's not my style either, but there are times when it sees almost constant use while the 490-4 LL, the Winstons and the 'boo sit idle. It is my favorite trout rod in a wind, or a gale, or a friggin' late afternoon western typhoon. Try casting a hopper into a gale with a slow rod and then fire up the RPL. Big difference. And speaking of the RPL, where did the notion come from that silk lines were the exclusive province of slow rods ? I put one of the modern silk lines from Phoenix in 5DT on the RPL and I think the lower profile silk line works very well on a relatively fast rod like the RPL, especially in the wind. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Replacement Laces | Bootlaces.com | General Discussion | 0 | May 29th, 2004 08:53 PM |
Wading with "parts" | Wayne Knight | Fly Fishing | 24 | October 6th, 2003 04:00 AM |