![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"pearl" wrote:
"I R Canuck" wrote: "pearl" wrote: "Invective" wrote: More than five million seals. Thirty pounds of fish per seal per day. Do the math. Which fish though? Fish eat fish too. What if seals eat significant amounts of the fish that eat cod? .... 'culling harp seals in an attempt to reduce the predation on cod could even backfire. Harp seals eat fish like capelin, which may themselves eat young cod, he says. So culling harp seals might even boost the number of cod predators.' http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994877 SNIP Pearls standard retardation *The point pearl is that Mr. Lavigne is making a statement not grounded in any science, much like the statement Mr. Reid made. You were critical of Mr. Reid's stance, but not of Mr. Lavigne's.* So, you bash any pro-sealer who makes a statement such as . . "There is no doubt that seal predation on groundfish is impeding the recovery of those stocks" (Gerry Reid) but not when the IFAW does it . . . "So culling harp seals might even boost the number of cod predators" (David Lavigne) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IFAW - Saving Harp Seals | KrakAttiK | Fishing in Canada | 77 | April 29th, 2004 11:03 AM |