Is a Rio WindCutter a good alternative for WF3?

The Windcutter is designed for long distance casting, and for casting into
the wind. It has much of its weight towards the tip of the line. this
foreward position of the weight helps in its objectives. However, when it
lands in the water, this heavy line splashes and makes niose in close
proximity to the fly. If you are fishing with delicate dry flies to
skittish fish, this can be objectionable.
If you are concerned with "presentation", and you don't want to scare the
fish, you want a line with a long front taper. It won't cast as far, but
doesn't make the noise. Such a line is the Rio Classic.
I put presentaion type lines on all of my lighter weight rods, such as your
3 weight. When I get to 6 and heavier, I use distance lines since I am
normally fishing with nymphs, of sinking lines, and don't need to worry
about noise.
You have to decide what you want..distance or presentation

--


---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Are you still wasting your time with spam?...
There is a solution!"

Protected by GIANT Company's Spam Inspector
The most powerful anti-spam software available.
http://mail.spaminspector.com


"William H.M. Wood" wrote in message
...

My previous question about a good WF3 unleashed a discussion on AFTMA
and resulted in some good tips. Wulff Triangle came highly recommended.
But that line is hard to find and/or very expensive in the corner of
Europe where I live.

Two tackle shops suggested a Rio WindCutter as alternative.

Does anybody have hands on experience with a WindCutter AFTMA 3?

Thanks