A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing Tying
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

traditional nymphs vs. bead heads?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old November 5th, 2004, 03:52 AM
Dave LaCourse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default traditional nymphs vs. bead heads?

Guy writes:

My preference has been to
not use split shot due to the problems with casting and wind knots.


That can be a problem when using split shot. It has a hinge effect. Best way
to do it is to make a circle cast. Lefty Kreh demonstrated it once at a show.
When your fly gets down stream, simply pick it up and cast upstream in one
motion. It ain't pretty, but it works. No false casting involved.

Have you, or anyone, experienced a definite increase with the use of bead
heads compared to traditional weighted nymphs? (Yes, a loaded question).


I don't know, but I really don't consider using the bead an advantage. They
probably serve a purpose in some anglers bag of tricks, but I have yet to
really see a difference.








 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Living with shooting heads Peter Charles Fly Fishing 14 July 14th, 2004 06:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.