![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry L" wrote in message ... SNIP I'm glad to hear Mike say he saw what LaFontaine reported ... my own caddis emerger efforts, and I've gotten a couple 'famous' tiers to admit the same of theirs, come from trying to imagine what a pupa would look like with bubbles because "they" say the pupa have bubbles. Until I actually see it myself, I'll still wonder if the sparkle isn't more attractor than imitation, I guess It is not particularly difficult to observe this. You need a tank, ( quite a small one will do, even a large jar), some larvae, and patience! One can see the effects quite easily. One also does not have to dive, ( I have not been diving for years, I feel too old for it, and my bones donīt like the cold anyway!) one may use a periscope. These are easily built from plastic pipe. Square pipe, such as is used for central heating convection, or cooker hoods etc is better than round, it is easier to fit the mirrors. You still need patience of course, and a good idea where the beasts are ascending! ![]() The effect is not so much one of isolated bubbles, but of one large silvery bubble, which reflects the surroundings, and the basic colour may shine through somewhat. When I first read Fontainesīs findings, I was very excited, pleased that his results so closely corresponded to mine, and immediately tied up the patterns, but unfortunately, they did not work very well for me. My own patterns were better. I have no idea why this should be so. Lastly, when the pupae are ascending, they do it quite quickly ( at least the species I managed to observe did), and they also hatch amazingly quickly. The trout still pick them off, but they have to be quick, which often means fast slashing takes. This of course also depends on depth and speed of flow. Sometimes movement ( a lift!) helps, sometimes it does not seem too. The "shrouded" patterns were my best bets in most cases, and usually mixed light brown ( hares ear colour!), with darker "wings" etc. Often it is very difficult to determine which species is hatching, but the shrouded silver patterns tend to catch anyway. In my opinion, on most European streams, the caddis is far more important than mayflies, and also has a much broader hatch window. This may also be true of some American streams, but of course I am only guessing that. Indeed, were I limited in any way to patterns, I would feel quite confident on practically any stream, with a range of midges, and caddis. TL MC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ParaNormal Caddis | while_1 | Fly Fishing Tying | 2 | December 16th, 2003 03:57 PM |
phesant tail caddis dry? | no | Fly Fishing Tying | 3 | October 28th, 2003 02:33 PM |
phesant tail caddis dry? | no | Fly Fishing | 2 | October 28th, 2003 03:19 AM |
cdc caddis | no | Fly Fishing | 17 | October 8th, 2003 12:22 AM |
caddis hackle question | no | Fly Fishing | 11 | September 23rd, 2003 02:35 PM |