![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim J. wrote:
rw wrote: snip Of course, I'd rather apologize on ROFF than spend 12 minutes, let alone 12 days, with either you or LaCourse. For the life of me, I do not understand your motivation in hijacking this thread from abpf, crossposting to roff, and writing this gem. It seems like you're stirring the pot of bitterness to bring the worst to the surface, but maybe I'm wrong and there is another reason. Could you please explain? It's very simple. The thread took a turn away from the Middle Fork and toward how much it costs for a major fishing trip. This is interesting to me, and I thought probably to some people on ROFF, and certainly more relevant for ROFF than for ABPF. If you're willing to give up on using a guide and rough it, you can go some pretty exotic places on the cheap. The Belize trip, for example, was very inexpensive, and although the fishing wasn't as good as we expected, overall the trip was easily worth it. This upcoming Alaska trip is going to interesting because (1) it's long, (2) I'm going with some other ROFF people, (3) we're going to have to fend for ourselves on a very remote river, and (4) the Kanektok is supposed to have great fishing for rainbows, silvers (that time of year), char, and grayling. And we're not spending much, even though Alaska is known for being very expensive. We're spending less per person than it costs for a typical guided one-week trip on the Middle Fork of the Salmon, and the fishing should be incomparably better. It takes a heck of a lot of planning, though. Now I'll admit that I probably shouldn't have included the dig at Fortenberry and LaCourse that you quote, but that wasn't really my point. They insist on insulting me and calling names, so I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rw wrote:
It's very simple. ... That's for sure. You're an arrogant, condescending jackass and a mean-spirited piece of ****. If you have to have someone change the sheets and wipe your ass was a totally uncalled for snideness about Louie's Labrador trips. FYI Mr. I Can Be An Insufferable Snob On The Cheap, guides are required by law in Labrador so all this Belize-Alaska braggadocio is as irrelevant as it is distasteful. You hijacked the thread to toss off some nastiness and boast about how clever you are. You're a ****in' putz. Now I'll admit that I probably shouldn't have included the dig at Fortenberry and LaCourse that you quote, but that wasn't really my point. You're a liar *and* a ****in' putz. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rw wrote:
Tim J. wrote: rw wrote: snip Of course, I'd rather apologize on ROFF than spend 12 minutes, let alone 12 days, with either you or LaCourse. For the life of me, I do not understand your motivation in hijacking this thread from abpf, crossposting to roff, and writing this gem. It seems like you're stirring the pot of bitterness to bring the worst to the surface, but maybe I'm wrong and there is another reason. Could you please explain? It's very simple. The thread took a turn away from the Middle Fork and toward how much it costs for a major fishing trip. snipped understandable part Now I'll admit that I probably shouldn't have included the dig at Fortenberry and LaCourse that you quote, but that wasn't really my point. They insist on insulting me and calling names, so I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. Got it. So you *were* just stirring the pot of bitterness. Too bad. Someone should throw that spoon and the entire cauldron away. -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim J. wrote:
Got it. So you *were* just stirring the pot of bitterness. Too bad. Look at the level of invective and bitterness being spewed by Fortenberry and LaCourse and get back to me. You can believe anything you want, Tim. It's a free country. Everyone knows that I don't get along with Fortenberry and LaCourse, and I'm hardly alone in that regard, but my motive for crossposting that message was simply to bring up the topic of cheap, self-guided, and let's say "extreme" fishing trips. I could have done it in a better way, and I regret including the dig. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rw wrote:
Tim J. wrote: Got it. So you *were* just stirring the pot of bitterness. Too bad. Look at the level of invective and bitterness being spewed by Fortenberry and LaCourse and get back to me. I think it's "too bad" either way it flows and have said so. You can believe anything you want, Tim. It's a free country. Everyone knows that I don't get along with Fortenberry and LaCourse, and I'm hardly alone in that regard, but my motive for crossposting that message was simply to bring up the topic of cheap, self-guided, and let's say "extreme" fishing trips. I could have done it in a better way, and I regret including the dig. FWIW (and it ain't much), I think better of you since you regret the dig. -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:15:44 GMT, rw
wrote: They insist on insulting me and calling names, so I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. Your use of the pronoun "they" is a lie. I have not called you anything except Barnard in these recent threads. I did say that when I float the Middle Fork of the Salmon (probably next year) that I hope I don't run into any putzes. Now, your insistence that I was referring to you can only mean that Fortenberry is correct in calling you a putz. You saw the word and immediately identified yourself with it. Do you recognize yourself as a putz? Simply because Forty says you are? Very funny, really. Sad, but very funny. I do hope you have a good trip in Alaska. Do you have a bear fense available for use, or are you going to take a chance that they will not bother you? What kind of boats will you be using. Sounds exciting, and if I was younger and not so sick I would love to do exactly what you are going to do. Please tell us more about this trip. You are correct in bringing it up on roff, but not by morphing it from Fortenberry's original Middle Fork thread of abf. A simple new thread "cheasp fishing trips" would have sufficed. You seem to condemn those of us that can afford a "lodge" trip instead of "roughing it". For the life of me, I can not see why. A lodge is the only way you can fish some places, especially Labrador and Kamchatka. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave LaCourse wrote:
Your use of the pronoun "they" is a lie. I have not called you anything except Barnard in these recent threads. I did say that when I float the Middle Fork of the Salmon (probably next year) that I hope I don't run into any putzes. Now, your insistence that I was referring to you can only mean that Fortenberry is correct in calling you a putz. You saw the word and immediately identified yourself with it. Do you recognize yourself as a putz? Simply because Forty says you are? Very funny, really. Sad, but very funny. Oh, so you weren't trying to insult me when you said you hope you don't run into any putzes? That's pretty hard to believe, Dave. I do hope you have a good trip in Alaska. Do you have a bear fense available for use, What's bear fense? or are you going to take a chance that they will not bother you? What kind of boats will you be using. Sounds exciting, and if I was younger and not so sick I would love to do exactly what you are going to do. Please tell us more about this trip. You are correct in bringing it up on roff, but not by morphing it from Fortenberry's original Middle Fork thread of abf. A simple new thread "cheasp fishing trips" would have sufficed. You seem to condemn those of us that can afford a "lodge" trip instead of "roughing it". For the life of me, I can not see why. A lodge is the only way you can fish some places, especially Labrador and Kamchatka. I'm sure the Rapid is a great river and the lodge is excellent, but I'm frugal -- some might say cheap -- and $3000 plus transportation is too rich for my blood. Plus, I like the idea of a challenging and adventurous trip. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:08:35 GMT, rw
wrote: Oh, so you weren't trying to insult me when you said you hope you don't run into any putzes? That's pretty hard to believe, Dave. Try, Barnard, try to believe it. I hope I don't run into any putzes on *any* river I float/fish. I mean, it's only human to keep away from putzes. I do hope you have a good trip in Alaska. Do you have a bear fense available for use, What's bear fense? Oooops. Me dumb. Make that bear fence. It is an electric fence you put up around your camping area to keep the brown bears away from you and yours. Most guided expeditionary type trips in Alaska have such a fence to protect you from the bears. I saw them in use on Moraine Creek. The female guide leading the three pontoon rafts (and one support raft) swears by them. or are you going to take a chance that they will not bother you? What kind of boats will you be using. Sounds exciting, and if I was younger and not so sick I would love to do exactly what you are going to do. Please tell us more about this trip. You are correct in bringing it up on roff, but not by morphing it from Fortenberry's original Middle Fork thread of abf. A simple new thread "cheasp fishing trips" would have sufficed. You seem to condemn those of us that can afford a "lodge" trip instead of "roughing it". For the life of me, I can not see why. A lodge is the only way you can fish some places, especially Labrador and Kamchatka. I'm sure the Rapid is a great river and the lodge is excellent, but I'm frugal -- some might say cheap -- and $3000 plus transportation is too rich for my blood. Plus, I like the idea of a challenging and adventurous trip. The Rapid costs nothing to fish if you want to walk in each day. But you have to sleep somewhere. I'm too old and sore for camping, so Lakewood Cabins is where I stay. They charge only $125/night and that includes three very good meals a day. I doubt you could stay in a hotel/motel and feed yourself for than kind of money and be on the Rapid. Labrador costs about $3000/week, but it is the ONLY way you can fish the rivers where the big brookies/salmon/laketrout/pike are. If you venture more than 100 yards from a highway, you must hire a local guide. Hardly seems fair, but last I checked, that was the law. So, your argument holds no water either with Lakewood or Labrador. -- |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TR MIddle Fork | Ken Fortenberry | Fly Fishing | 0 | June 25th, 2005 02:36 PM |
TR: Mountain Fork River (SE OKLA.) | Charles Crolley | Fly Fishing | 12 | June 21st, 2005 07:43 AM |
Fly Fishing River At Risk | [email protected] | Fly Fishing Tying | 3 | June 20th, 2005 10:16 PM |
TR - South Fork Tuolumne/Big Creek | Allyn Vaughn | Fly Fishing | 0 | June 1st, 2005 02:31 AM |
Dallas Tx, Fly Fishers Auction April 23rd | No left turn | Fly Fishing | 0 | April 22nd, 2005 12:16 AM |