![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Nov 2005 18:32:18 -0800, "Johnson"
wrote: The whole story is covered. Ah, well, if you are sure, that's good enough for me... the potential for the wholesale of a hundred million acres of national forest and BLM land. Well, there's _potential_ for bigfoots...er, bigfeets...well, big hairy sumbitches to come out of trees and eat babies...so let's be prophylactic and cut down all the trees...or get rid of all the tempting babies...LET'S DO SOMETHING FOR GAWDSAKES!!! That's where the nations best trout streams are, bar none. We are talking about millions of anglers losing access and their streams for forever. It alos appears that the mining companies won't be the only folks digging in. This is perhaps the greatest anti-fly fishing measure I have ever seen proposed by congress. Uh, huh - so we should protect the FFing streams at the cost of the national interest, or protect them for you, or...???...hmm...IAC, that might not be enough...some rogue might not get in under the guise of being a FFer. Let's REALLY protect things and just ban any and all access. I know that a true conservationist such as yourself will be the first to publicly pledge to never enter public land again because it might damage things... Eleven-and-half-eagles....dick |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow that was perhaps the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen posted.
What kind of coldwater fly fishermen advocates selling off the national forests? You do know where the best trout fishing is, don't you? But I guess TU is just lying, and you are the one with all the knowledge. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message Uh, huh - so we should protect the FFing streams at the cost of the national interest I would see your side, if I could find one bit of "national interest" beyond personal enrichment on lands purchased on behalf of the nation as a whole. Even with the exemptions, why should the government be selling off(at bargain rates) National Forest lands?? Plus, if it was in the "National Interest", they probably wouldn't have to sneak it into legislation, but could proudly pass it as a stand alone measure........just my guess. Tom |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Cleveland" wrote in message ... If so then give him a call *tonight* and ask that he vote to remove against the budget reconciliation bill until Richard Pombo's public land giveaway is removed. http://www.tu.org/siteapps/advocacy/...NuFmG&b=376957 http://www.bettermines.org/pombo.cfm g.c. Get real, how many of these gutless swine have even spoken up in the face of all the corruption, fraud, incompetence, espionage, lies, torture, and treason of the Bushies? It isn't about the USA anymore for these scum . . . its just protecting their partisan funnel for all the bribes they can pack in before the gravytrain crashes. And from what Ive seen your average Republican voter these days is either too embarrassed or cowed to speak up, or is still repeating 6 year old Monica blowjob jokes and staying half soused. And the Christian whackjobs are running amuck. Damn few intelligent Republicans are speaking up. (Hegel, Graham, McCain). Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT Republican End Game | Ken Fortenberry | Fly Fishing | 21 | March 17th, 2005 03:59 PM |
That damn Republican brother of mine... | Wayne Knight | Fly Fishing | 28 | December 7th, 2004 02:35 AM |
bird hunting, Republican style | rw | Fly Fishing | 116 | March 13th, 2004 09:21 AM |
Rolling Stone - Bush is worst environmental president ever | Sportsmen Against Bush | Fly Fishing | 0 | December 4th, 2003 09:02 AM |