Most Humane Way to Clean Fish

wrote:

To me, the main difference is that a fish's faimily probably would
mourn for them as much as a human's family would mourn for a human, but
it's the possible physical pain that bothers me.

I was pretty sure from the start that this thread was a troll, and
this clinches it.


Chuck Vance ("fish's faimily ... mourn for them"?!)

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:35:46 -0600, Conan The Librarian
wrote:

wrote:

To me, the main difference is that a fish's faimily probably would
mourn for them as much as a human's family would mourn for a human, but
it's the possible physical pain that bothers me.

I was pretty sure from the start that this thread was a troll, and
this clinches it.


Chuck Vance ("fish's faimily ... mourn for them"?!)

It's all Clinton's fault. He shook hands with JFK, and JFK was
Catholic - well, so he claimed, anyway. Catholics eat fish on Friday.
The Kennedy band are...er, is...er,am...well, whatever...Catholic. The
Kennedys are involved in lots of funerals. Think of all the fish
funerals they've caused! There can be no questioning that the data on
this table - http://tinyurl.com/7ka8c - proves it.

HTH,
R

On 16 Nov 2005 17:49:46 -0800, wrote:


To me, the main difference is that a fish's faimily probably would
mourn for them as much as a human's family would mourn for a human, but
it's the possible physical pain that bothers me.


Please go back to your Vegan group. You know nothing whatsoever about
fish, as indicated in the above quote.

Whoever said you're as messed up as a soup sandwich was being a bit
too kind. There's not enough to you to have ever had the sandwich
part going. Thin vegetable broth is the heartiest I can grant and I
have a hard time doing that.

Cyli
r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels.
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli
email: lid (strip the .invalid to email)

Cyli wrote:
On 16 Nov 2005 17:49:46 -0800, wrote:

To me, the main difference is that a fish's faimily probably would
mourn for them as much as a human's family would mourn for a human, but
it's the possible physical pain that bothers me.

Please go back to your Vegan group. You know nothing whatsoever about
fish, as indicated in the above quote.

I didn't notice that...I meant they probably WOULDN'T mourn for them as
much, though a missing parent might mean death for for baby fish. I
won't pretend to know enough about fish to know. But whatever I meant
there, you don't have to throw out every other important detail from me
and from the woman I quoted.

barry wrote ...


snip

the woman I quoted.

You're generous.

Dan

wrote in message
ups.com...

...whatever I meant there...

Leave a number. As soon as somebody figures it out we'll call you.

Wolfgang

On 17 Nov 2005 16:05:51 -0800, wrote:

though a missing parent might mean death for for baby fish.

You have to either be a moron or a troll.

The "parents" of baby fish will EAT them, given the chance. And if
the baby fish grow bigger and stronger they some day may eat their
"parents". It is one helluva cruel world underneath that water.

wayno said it best: Soup Sandwich

Dave (who has yet to devour one of his offspring)

On 17 Nov 2005 16:05:51 -0800, wrote:


(Snipped)

you don't have to throw out every other important detail from me
and from the woman I quoted.

There were no important details, Sally / Barry. Take my word for it.

Cyli
r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels.
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli
email: lid (strip the .invalid to email)