Sick of the license BS

"Ken C" wrote in message
...
On 14 May 2006 09:24:38 -0700, "George Adams"
wrote:
I hope it's a state that confiscates all the equipment that the poacher
used, including his vehicle. Although that penalty is usually only
enforced for big game violations.

The typical fine is $150, so it doesn't take too long until you are
way ahead of the game.

The point is, the rules are stupid and unreasonable. Only a product of
inbreeding follows every rule.

Ken C

Your time here on ROFF will be very short, so I wonder why you even bothered
to troll this moronic line?

Happy pochin', ****head.

Op

"Mr. Opus McDopus" wrote in message
. ..
The typical fine is $150, so it doesn't take too long until you are
way ahead of the game.

The point is, the rules are stupid and unreasonable. Only a product of
inbreeding follows every rule.

Ken C

It just occurred to me. What with companies, universities and what not
doing Google searches now a dayz, it's just a matter of time before judges
are doin' the same from the bench.

I can just see 'ol Kennie Poo explainin' to his Honor that it was just a
matter of ignorance that, he (Kennie Poo Poacher)-- the epitome of the legal
citizen--neglected to purchase the proper huntin'/fishin' license. So the
good judge, an avid hunter and fisher himself, decides to check into 'ol
Kennie Poo's past. For heaven's sake, what's this thing called ROFF?

Op --lookin' forward to the sentencing phase of the trial--

Hey, why don't you come out here where they take all your tackle, car
and boat. I would go down to the state auction and buy it for 5 cents
on the dollar, but I don't have any Walmart-grade tackle and I'm not
starting now. By the way, those fees help support fishing and hunting
this country. Why do you hate America so much?

Frank Reid

By the way, any state fish and game folks, you might want to be
watching out for Mr. Ken Cooperstein of Huntington, NY. His number is
516-754-5524. He can be found at meetings of the Larkfield Amateur
Radio Club (he's the Secretary). His call letters are K2JDY. He keeps
his boat on Long Island.

Frank Reid
(its amazing what google can do!)

"Frank Reid" wrote in message
ups.com...
Hey, why don't you come out here where they take all your tackle, car
and boat. I would go down to the state auction and buy it for 5 cents
on the dollar, but I don't have any Walmart-grade tackle and I'm not
starting now. By the way, those fees help support fishing and hunting
this country. Why do you hate America so much?

Frank Reid


A lot of the fees are BS. Most of the F&G money goes into the general fund
and that a portion is allocated to F&G. At least in California. And the
cost of a 1-3 day license in some places is attrocious. $20-25 for a
non-resident 3 daylicense and a resident license for a year is about the
same.

Buy the freaking license dude. Wherever you go. You don't get to make
up your own rules. bruce h

On Sat, 13 May 2006 07:10:21 -0500, Ken C
wrote:
Needless to say, I took my chances. After
all, I have never been approached for a license check in 40 years of
fishing.

I had to do some income-producing work, but now am back.

Yes, fishing without a license where one is required is within the
technical definition of poaching. However, because there is no
intention to take any fish, it is not theft. It is in the same
category as a non-injurious trespass -- lke cutting across private
property to save time.

If you think such conduct is immoral, then you are wrong on the law --
and possibly retarded. It may be unlawful, but not all unlawful
conduct is immoral. Other examples of unlawful conduct that is not
immoral are speeding, drinking beer in a public park, and discharging
a firearm close to a public road.

Abusive language is not unlawful. However, calling a person a thief
who is not a thief is actionable defamation -- and immoral. A slam
dunk, by the way.

One of these days, one of you ****heads will go too far and find
himself at the wrong end of a very expensive lawsuit from which even
bankruptcy can provide no relief.

Ken C

Ken C wrote:
snip
Abusive language is not unlawful. However, calling a person a thief
who is not a thief is actionable defamation -- and immoral. A slam
dunk, by the way.

One of these days, one of you ****heads will go too far and find
himself at the wrong end of a very expensive lawsuit from which even
bankruptcy can provide no relief.

Uh, skuze me, but calling a person a ****head who is not a ****head is,
well, just wrong.

.... unless it's done in good taste, of course.
--
TL,
Tim
---------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj/

"Ken C" wrote in message
...

Yes, fishing without a license where one is required is within the
technical definition of poaching. However, because there is no
intention to take any fish, it is not theft.

Last I checked they called it a fishing license, not a catching license.

Ken C wrote:

I had to do some income-producing work, but now am back.
silly **** snipped

You're forgetting the first law of finding yourself in a hole.

You have demonstrated here that you are an immoral thief, a
disgusting excuse for a human being and no sportsman worthy
of the name. So quit digging already.

--
Ken Fortenberry