Sad News

In article , says...

"Joe" wrote in message
.net...

I explained how I read his statement and the original target asked Opie
to explain what he meant if it wasn't how it sounded. Opie's only
response was to call me names.

Your ability to remember is no better than your ability to read or write!

I explained myself fully to *you* with out any name calling. I merely
sugested that you couldn't read.

Then you came back stating something incomprehensible and I tried to further
explain myself, and only then resorted tocallin' you, what you are, A MORON!

See Below to refresh your memory.

Op


Rather than continue to speculate on what Opie actually meant I felt
it was better to let him explain himself. Unless I missed it he hasn't
responded yet.


Don't know where you get that I can't read. It was a sarcastic
statement. Unemployment statistics are not handled differently in
different states.

"Well you claimed that I had made a "bogus claim" about livin' in a hi-tech
Mecca, when in fact I had made no such claim? And then you state that I
seem to think that unemployment stats are calculated differently in
different regions of the country?"

"Were you born a moron, or did you have to work real hard at becomin' one?"

Op

I've never seen anyone both top and bottom post at the same time.

Listen dickhead, is that better? I don't generally like to call names,
but it seems to be all you understand.

The question was, what did you mean by?

"Op --being right-handed, I can see that you wouldn't
understand that knot (obroff) all of us live in the Mecca of hi-
tech--".

I took it one way and instead of explaining yourself you called
names. I pointed out that you still hadn't explained what
you meant and you came back calling names again. Still not
explaining what you really meant.

I can only conclude that you really did mean what you said
and you're embarrassed because it's not supported by the
unemployment data.

If you want to continue to call names that's fine by me,
but hiding behind name calling is so grade school.

In article ,
lid says...
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 10:07:01 -0700, Joe wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 08:13:09 -0700, Joe wrote:

Remember this started with your bogus claim of living
in a "high-tech mecca".

Actually, he didn't claim any such thing. He said "knot(pun intended) all of us"
live in a high tech Mecca.

Very Clintonian of you.

And very 'Bush' of you. g

Here's what he posted: "Op --being right-handed, I can see that you wouldn't
understand that knot (obroff) all of us live in the Mecca of hi-tech--".
Where's the bogus claim?

I guess I took it the wrong way too. It read to me like Op was saying
that since I lived in a hi-tech mecca that the unemployment picture was
different here than in the rest of the country.
- Ken