![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:25:57 GMT, "Larry L"
wrote: "Lazarus Cooke" wrote To this long-time exile, could you, succinctly, explain why Obama is much better than Clinton? I have a republican (as opposed to Republican) dislike for dynasties and she went the wrong way, and he the right way, over Iraq, but beyond that? (There's a nice article in today's Manchester Guardian about this - http://tinyurl.com/37hyjs but it's written by a Brit, and thus inevitably a bit suspect) I think the article you site does a good job ... i.e. there aren't huge 'issue' differences The reasons I prefer Obama include ... he strikes me as extremely intelligent ( a very big change over the last 8 years ), not that Clinton is dumb. Obama has a quality you don't often see in politicians, he actually listens. Let me use this ROFF place to explain how I mean that. Around here, people read ( listen) only until they have something to attack or use to gain points for themselves, often ending up mis-reading in the haste to attack/ defend, this is the typical politicians style too. Obama gives me the impression that he actually tries hard to understand what is being said, and works as hard at finding things to agree with as to disagree with. I base this observation over the long term and not just the last few weeks, where, sadly, Obama has be forced more into a 'sound bite' mode. Obama is bringing LOTS of new people into the process, young people and older folk wanting to hope again. Democracy is about 'the people' and the fact that several TIMES as many people are voting, this Dem primary, as in the past IS ALREADY a wonderful accomplishment for the man. Obama is truly interested in the future, in trying to find common ground and start repairing the damage Rove et al have done to our country. I base this on what he says and my "gut" evaluation of his honesty. Clinton uses much of the same language of "change" and "future" but also slips often into little lapses that, to me, indicate she really wants to go back to the 90's and 'settle some business' .... first you 'can't go home again' ... second, we need a person that really wants to unite, not one with a chip still shouldered. ANY of the Republicans running would be far, Far, FAR, worse than any of the Dems that have. McCain is better than Bush, but who isn't? That said, 'electability' is a big issue ... right now polls show Obama would beat McCain handily, Clinton would lose to him. Many Republicans don't have anyone to vote FOR in this race, but Many, Many would come out to vote AGAINST Hillary. MY Country desperately needs an "image makeover" in the world thanks to Bush ( as you well understand ) IMHO, electing Obama in a country that has our racist history will send a clear massage to the world that we ARE still trying to be a place where anyone can 'make it' and greatly improve our image ( this is my only 'racial' thought about this election ). Electing Clinton II shortly after electing Bush II will increase the impression that we are really becoming a place of dynasties As rw says, if Clinton gets the nomination, I'll vote and work for her since she stands head, shoulders, and bust line g above any on the other side ... but Obama is the first ( mostly for 'gut impression' reasons ) politician in a long time that I have voted FOR ... strictly FOR .... i.e. I didn't vote against Hillary .... I voted FOR Obama Well said and rightly spoken. And thank you for that... /daytripper |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry L wrote:
As rw says, if Clinton gets the nomination, I'll vote and work for her since she stands head, shoulders, and bust line g above any on the other side .... but Obama is the first ( mostly for 'gut impression' reasons ) politician in a long time that I have voted FOR ... strictly FOR .... i.e. I didn't vote against Hillary .... I voted FOR Obama I think Obama will eventually get the nomination, but it might be a brokered convention. That alone would be an entertaining political drama, unseen in America for many years. The Democratic nomination might come down to the "super delegates," who are typically office holders or insiders of some stripe. They can vote for whomever they please. I'm an ordinary delegate. My vote is committed to Obama, the overwhelming favorite (50-8) of my fellow caucus members. My biggest problem with Hillary Clinton is that she could energize the rabid right-wing Republican vote. They hate her. Her campaign would be a get-out-the-vote campaign for the wingers. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, Royal and Larry etc..
You've convinced me. Lazarus |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry L" wrote in message ... ...Electing Clinton II shortly after electing Bush II will increase the impression that we are really becoming a place of dynasties.... Oh, good grief. Does the name Roosevelt ring any bells? No? Adams? Wolfgang well, what can one expect in a world in which some local "sports" franchise or other wins some parochial championship or other and everybody starts to bleat about "dynasties"? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 5-Feb-2008, rw wrote: I'm driving 120 miles round-trip to the the Democratic Party caucus in Challis to support Obama. Custer County has one delegate. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. I just would like to see the current scumbags voted out of office ASAP and resoundingly so! Good luck w Obama I have my doubts whether this country is yet ready for a black man as Prez But my border collie is a better choice than what we have now Fred Fred |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:15:23 -0500, "Tim J."
wrote: typed: On 5-Feb-2008, rw wrote: I'm driving 120 miles round-trip to the the Democratic Party caucus in Challis to support Obama. Custer County has one delegate. I just would like to see the current scumbags voted out of office ASAP and resoundingly so! Let us know how you mark the ballot to vote someone out. -- TL, Tim (It must be one of those Florida thingies. . . ) ------------------------- http://css.sbcma.com/timj Nahhh. He's just been smokin' some baaaaad stuff, dontchaknow. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rw wrote:
I'm driving 120 miles round-trip to the the Democratic Party caucus in Challis to support Obama. Custer County has one delegate. i'll chip in on your gas bill next time i see you...good work!! i'll be interested in seeing what happens. this has been a facinating primary process on both sides... jeff |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jeff miller" wrote in message . .. i'll chip in on your gas bill next time i see you...good work!! oh, here we go again. Jeff will put in "Regular" and all hell will break loose...... Tom p.s. What? Doesn't everyone throw a fit over that one? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama? | Opus | Fly Fishing | 150 | December 15th, 2006 05:08 PM |