911

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:10:21 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

An how did they pick 757s? The only american air line at time capable
of remote control. 7

Yeah, that remote control guy sure did a ****ty job on the plane
flying into the field in PA, and he missed his target terribly at the
Pentagon. Those remote control guys in the black helicopters are
****ty performers.

Idiot.

Dave

The 911 is a great car, of course, especially the turbo model.
However, the new Nissan GT-R at ~$72K is faster and more nimble at
half the price.

Dave

On Dec 11, 2:15*am, "asadi" wrote:
To say that the collapses and how they occurred were 'drilled' into us as a
part of our training is putting it mildly....I have tried to approach it
objectively and to be honest....I no longer believe what I was told..

Anybody got bourbon and a campfire?

Oh boy, a subject on which I have bona fide expertise. I can tell
you, with professional certainty, that the explanations offered (and
deferred) by the US government are entirely consistent with sound
structural engineering theory and principles. Especially in WTC 1 &
2, the likelihood of a gradual deformation/failure of the floor
framing leading to a catastrophic buckling of the primary columns is
an entirely plausible concept, and one that is not contradicted by any
of the video evidence I've seen.

The failure mechanism of WTC7 is less certain; but the scenarios
theorized by the official reports are also consistent with the video
evidence. From what I've read, when they weren't sure, they said so.

I've participated in several long-running discussions with folks who
were hell bent on believing some controlled demolition nonsense
despite ample evidence to the contrary and unexplainable
inconsistencies in the totality of that idea; but folks will believe
what they want to believe, the facts be damned.

So as a genuine, registered, experienced, practicing structural
engineer, I'd stake my license on the failure mechanism of the WTC
buildings being almost exactly what the official explanation suggests.

That said, I believe there's still plenty of room for conspiracies
within many of the other aspects of the attack, not the least of which
is the financing and training of the terrorists, and who knew what and
when. There are more than enough odd "coincidences" and associations
to suggest that the official story obfuscates some important facts
about the attacks as a whole; but as for the collapses themselves,
there's little doubt among the engineering community as to what really
happened.

Joe F.

rb608 wrote:
snip
There are more than enough odd "coincidences" and associations
to suggest that the official story obfuscates some important facts
about the attacks as a whole; but as for the collapses themselves,
there's little doubt among the engineering community as to what really
happened.

Martian photon torpedoes. Am I right or am I right ?

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
rb608 wrote:
snip
There are more than enough odd "coincidences" and associations
to suggest that the official story obfuscates some important facts
about the attacks as a whole; but as for the collapses themselves,
there's little doubt among the engineering community as to what really
happened.

Martian photon torpedoes. Am I right or am I right ?


No, you´re just a sick asshole.

On Dec 11, 3:00*pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:
Martian photon torpedoes. Am I right or am I right ?

Inbev lager kegs.

Joe F.

rb608 wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Martian photon torpedoes. Am I right or am I right ?

Inbev lager kegs.

Well, that ties in nicely doesn't it. The Martians were so ****ed
about not getting their Budweiser they hurled their empties back
to earth in a fit of pique.

--
Ken Fortenberry

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
...
rb608 wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Martian photon torpedoes. Am I right or am I right ?

Inbev lager kegs.

Well, that ties in nicely doesn't it. The Martians were so ****ed
about not getting their Budweiser they hurled their empties back
to earth in a fit of pique.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Careful out their 40...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CsKj4LXcUg

JT

On Dec 11, 2:15*am, "asadi" wrote:
....Okay, we are never going to really know what happened to Kennedy...

He was shot.

"redietz" wrote in message
...
On Dec 11, 2:15 am, "asadi" wrote:
....Okay, we are never going to really know what happened to Kennedy...

He was shot.


.....Pal, my wife had to come in from the other room and ask me what I was
laughing about!

most excellant...

john