![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I found a good deal for rod support roller o-rings at C & G Tackle
Outlet, which are selling for fifty cents ($.50) less than Renzetti's current price. Renzetti is 'Kirkman's sponsor'; C & G Tackle Outlet can more than likely be termed: 'less than Kirkman's sponsor', as i have been summarily informed. When i posted this information on rodbuilding.org, Kirkman removed my post. Many posts with various views followed: Kirkman removed them all, and sent me the following email: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Gary, The owner of C&G Tackle has a history of attacking me and spreading rumors and falsehoods designed expressly to harm RodMaker Magazine and RodBuilding.org. He is free to do that, but I will not provide him with the means to do so. I spent much time promoting his former companies, Clemens Tackle and RodCrafters and was repaid by his distasteful conduct. I will not go into this any further. I am the owner of Rodbuilding.org and have 100% authority on what can, and cannot, be posted there. My record and work on behalf of the rod building industry is beyond reproach. I will not allow any group or individual to destroy what I have done on behalf of the rod building craft. It is also important that I protect and promote those companies who have been willing to foot the bill to provide what most builders feel is a truly excellent site. It isn't free - somebody has to pay for it and when non-sponsors take an unfair advantage in promoting their products on a board that others are paying for, I will put my foot down. Sincerely, Tom Kirkman" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ I find your email to be ambiguous hyperbole. I am not interested in your personal life, nor the soap operas or the seeming vendettas which may abound therein; however, i am interested in giving all rodcrafters the best information i have. In addition, i have no wish to post something you find so abhorrent on your bulletin board. As a newcomer to boards and newsgroups, (though i have been building rods and teaching rodbuilding for over 20 yrs), i would appreciate all relevant responses to this situation. How far does one go to censor a fifty cent savings? One's sponsor would object? Thank you in advance, Sincerely, bluestonerod |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mr. Perez -
Anyone who knows anything about rod building knows that Tom K. is a first class guy. He's provided so many things that we never had before like a full size magazine and the very best internet rod building site on the planet. His site is provided free for all of us to use and enjoy and there's no other place that is as friendly or easy to use. It's a class act all the way! But there are some who try to take advantage of his generousity and kindness. I guess you touched a nerve and he just had had enough. I thought his response was a bit harsher than what you usually hear from him but not out of line at all considering what some have tried to do him and his board. I think he was right to remove the post you made about the products of a non sponsor and your own post was very harsh and uncalled for. That sort of thing doesn't go down well on Tom's board and I'm glad he runs a tight ship. I have a high regard for the many fine sponsors on his board and he is right to protect them. After all they pay to provide that board for all of us and we want it to stay just like it is. You owe Tom an apology for posting a private email on a newsgroup. I don't think he would do that to you but he is a professional. John |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John,
From your answer i can see you do not read the as per sponsors pay more atten: when reading strings on the BB. Its not a matter of agreement, its the point of free expression. Thank you for yours. Rodbuilders.org new motto: ~~~~~~~~ALL KNOWLEDGE WELCOME ON THIS BOARD EXCEPT FROM THOSE WITH WHOM KIRKMAN HAS A PERSONAL VENDETTA~~~~~~~~~ Carry on. bluestonerod |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mr. Perez:
I believe you have made some very bad assumptions about how internet rod building forums operate. Boards cost money and most rely on sponsors for funding. Now if a non-sponsor can get advertising and promotion at no charge on those boards, then those who are sponsors will stop paying a fee to be sponsors. At that point, the money runs out and the board shuts down. Tom Kirkman has the finest internet rod building board there is. He has done us all a good deed to create this wonderful site where more rod building information is exchanged than anywhere else. If his sponsors get mad and leave, then the board will shut down and we will lose the #1 rod building site on the internet. Boards that are not moderated are hateful cesspools of arguments and problems. Tom's board runs smooth as silk because he has set some rules and is quick to enforce them. I applaud his sense of fairness but realize he has to protect the interest of his sponsors. They pay for the board and are entitled to preferential treatment. There are also a small handful of troublemakers that he is right to keep out. They have ruined other boards and no one wants a repeat of that at rodbuilding.org. I hope you will send Tom an apology. He's a super friendly guy and I'm sure he'll be willing to overlook your mistake. Best of luck to you. Aurthur Mercer |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
lid wrote in message . ..
On 6 Dec 2003 17:00:48 -0800, (Bluestone) wrote: As a newcomer to boards and newsgroups, (though i have been building rods and teaching rodbuilding for over 20 yrs), i would appreciate all relevant responses to this situation. How far does one go to censor a fifty cent savings? One's sponsor would object? Looks as if you accidentally stepped in something. Yes, and i have now made the decisive step out of it. Thank you, cyli, for the most thoughtful, relevant and responsive post i have yet received. So instead of a gentle clue or two, you got a bit nearer the 'up aside the head' response. I've seen lots worse if it's any consolation. While i surely don't mind any "up 'side the head" responses, i don't find it necessary to respond exactly in kind. By the way, it's regarded as very bad manners to directly quote email on the 'Net. I was given rather more information than i wish to ever know re censorship on anyone's board, and, one individual's reasoning behind said censorship. For the sake of clarity, i chose to post the email i received and be called 'ill mannered' rather than paraphrase the board admin/owner's reply and be 'misunderstood'. Now, with the motto in mind: ~~~~~~~~~ALL KNOWLEDGE WELCOME HERE EXCEPT FROM THOSE WITH WHOM THE BOARD OWNER HAS A PERSONAL VENDETTA~~~~~~~~~~, I shall choose my forums more wisely. Thank you particularly, cyli, for your well done and thoroughly comprehensive post to my questions. Sincerely, Bluestonerod |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bluestone" schrieb im Newsbeitrag om... John, From your answer i can see you do not read the as per sponsors pay more atten: when reading strings on the BB. Its not a matter of agreement, its the point of free expression. Thank you for yours. Rodbuilders.org new motto: ~~~~~~~~ALL KNOWLEDGE WELCOME ON THIS BOARD EXCEPT FROM THOSE WITH WHOM KIRKMAN HAS A PERSONAL VENDETTA~~~~~~~~~ Carry on. bluestonerod You can not expect free expression on a monitored board, or even on this one. If you go beyond the limits of what somebody finds acceptable, and they manage to contact and convince your ISP of the same, then not only do you lose your "free expression", but also your access to usenet or the internet. It does not matter whether you are right or wrong. Except to you, and perhaps a few others. Publishing your annoyance, or attempting to gain some sort of revenge on the purported pepetrator, on other boards, is also likely to prove extremely contra.productive. Quite apart from getting some other people who are basically not interested, annoyed at you. Believe me, it is really just a waste of time and effort. Some things are as they are, one is obliged to accept them, or at least is best served in doing so. TL MC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Connor" wrote... "Bluestone" wrote... John, From your answer i can see you do not read the as per sponsors pay more atten: when reading strings on the BB. Its not a matter of agreement, its the point of free expression. Thank you for yours. Rodbuilders.org new motto: ~~~~~~~~ALL KNOWLEDGE WELCOME ON THIS BOARD EXCEPT FROM THOSE WITH WHOM KIRKMAN HAS A PERSONAL VENDETTA~~~~~~~~~ Carry on. bluestonerod You can not expect free expression on a monitored board, or even on this one. If you go beyond the limits of what somebody finds acceptable, and they manage to contact and convince your ISP of the same, then not only do you lose your "free expression", but also your access to usenet or the internet. It does not matter whether you are right or wrong. Except to you, and perhaps a few others. Publishing your annoyance, or attempting to gain some sort of revenge on the purported pepetrator, on other boards, is also likely to prove extremely contra.productive. Quite apart from getting some other people who are basically not interested, annoyed at you. Believe me, it is really just a waste of time and effort. Some things are as they are, one is obliged to accept them, or at least is best served in doing so. Seems as good a place as any to say "Welcome back, Mike." It's good to see you posting again. -- TL, Tim http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd like to thank you for your post on the 'Ethics' of this gentleman's
website...as you've just done some free advertising for what appears to be a fine site run by an upstanding individual. I've been collecting information to build my own rod and for whatever reason, had not yet run upon this fine site. It appears to be exactly what I'm looking for -- a good site run by someone who is fair and honest. I've bookmarked it for future reference and won't be hesitant to pay an extra $0.50 for honesty and integrity. Have a good day. "Bluestone" wrote in message om... I found a good deal for rod support roller o-rings at C & G Tackle Outlet, which are selling for fifty cents ($.50) less than Renzetti's current price. Renzetti is 'Kirkman's sponsor'; C & G Tackle Outlet can more than likely be termed: 'less than Kirkman's sponsor', as i have been summarily informed. When i posted this information on rodbuilding.org, Kirkman removed my post. Many posts with various views followed: Kirkman removed them all, and sent me the following email: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Gary, The owner of C&G Tackle has a history of attacking me and spreading rumors and falsehoods designed expressly to harm RodMaker Magazine and RodBuilding.org. He is free to do that, but I will not provide him with the means to do so. I spent much time promoting his former companies, Clemens Tackle and RodCrafters and was repaid by his distasteful conduct. I will not go into this any further. I am the owner of Rodbuilding.org and have 100% authority on what can, and cannot, be posted there. My record and work on behalf of the rod building industry is beyond reproach. I will not allow any group or individual to destroy what I have done on behalf of the rod building craft. It is also important that I protect and promote those companies who have been willing to foot the bill to provide what most builders feel is a truly excellent site. It isn't free - somebody has to pay for it and when non-sponsors take an unfair advantage in promoting their products on a board that others are paying for, I will put my foot down. Sincerely, Tom Kirkman" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ I find your email to be ambiguous hyperbole. I am not interested in your personal life, nor the soap operas or the seeming vendettas which may abound therein; however, i am interested in giving all rodcrafters the best information i have. In addition, i have no wish to post something you find so abhorrent on your bulletin board. As a newcomer to boards and newsgroups, (though i have been building rods and teaching rodbuilding for over 20 yrs), i would appreciate all relevant responses to this situation. How far does one go to censor a fifty cent savings? One's sponsor would object? Thank you in advance, Sincerely, bluestonerod |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim J." schrieb im Newsbeitrag news ![]() SNIP Seems as good a place as any to say "Welcome back, Mike." It's good to see you posting again. -- TL, Tim http://css.sbcma.com/timj Thank you. Surprising how one misses this place, and how soon one feels "at home" again in it. Decidedly odd, and very mixed feelings involved. One does indeed regard many of the people here as old friends. Even though I have never met most of them, and never will. I am in rather a quandary as it happens. Perhaps an identity crisis? Who am I , what am I , why am I? I donīt really know. I have not been fishing for quite a while, and the few times I did go, I was not particularly enthusiastic. I have not even tied any flies, or built any tackle for a long time. All my stuff lies unused and ignored in various places about the house. Having spent nearly all my life passionately engaged in fishing, or at least some aspect of it, this is a most unfortunate turn of events. Mainly because there are no alternatives. I donīt really know much about anything else, certainly not in the same way, nor was I ever much interested in anything else. One can not turn the clock back, and I can not think of any even remotely similar pastime which would be so absorbing anyway. It would be most regrettable to lose interest altogether. Nevertheless, it is good to talk about it again at least. I will just have to wait and see what transpires. Perhaps my enthusiasm will return. Maybe I am just getting old faster than I thought. Behold the winding, dancing, sparkling stream, ethereal, enchanting, as in some joyous youthful dream, beheld, and then, the all consuming wish, to carry home the streamīs elusive fish. But dreams fade rapidly at last, like youth. Advancing age, and weariness, reveal the truth, all the battles, and the fish you caught, mean nothing much, it was not fish you sought. Peace, contentment, and a happy life, free of troubles, sickness, and all other strife, fishing may indeed these earthly woes transcend, as angler makes his way around another river bend. `Tis sad that one may not just simply fish oneīs life away, ignoring all the cares and problems, always bright and gay, but life intrudes most rudely, and forces oneīs attention, sometimes overpowering, defying comprehension. Dreams are scattered then, borne away on evil winds, as humdrum life the once great hope and joy rescinds, ambition dies, one sinks in mournful contemplation, of how things were, of each and every revelation. Knowledge gained, seems worthless on reflection, one is enchained for hours and days by useless circumspection. a rod, a box of flies, once source of magical enjoyment, now sit ignored, unused, no point in their deployment. "Hope springs eternal", or so ītis often lightly said, even when the wings of spirit, have feet of lead. I will yet take my rod and flies to some bright stream again, I know I will, all I do not know, is when? TL MC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|