The politics of nature

"Wolfgang" wrote in news:bsulj4$1kleq$1@ID-
205717.news.uni-berlin.de:


"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
. 1.4...
"Wolfgang" wrote in news:bsul9d$1fg14$1@ID-
205717.news.uni-berlin.de:


Who'da thunk it?

Another
possibility would be the original cast of "Soap".

And the difference is.....?

Wolfgang




Robert Guillaume had a sense of humor.

Scott

On 31 Dec 2003 14:38:36 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

hey Scott Happy New Year
is there a meeting next wed. and if so where?

We made our choices, knowin' full well that our candidate
didn't have a snow-balls chance in hell of winnin', yet we voted for them
nonetheless. Imagine that, there are folks that actually vote their
conscience.
Op

Even though I believe that Nader's candicacy helped Bush's victory, Op is
dead right in his stance. Everyone is entitled to vote their particular
conscience under the Constitution we all claim to support and wish to see
protected. If there is a viable option in a third party candidate, I look
and listen to that candidate seriously before making a ballot choice. But
if there isn't, I've been known to write in my own name for some positions.
--
Stev Lenon 91B20 '68-'69
Drowning flies to Darkstar

http://web.tampabay.rr.com/stevglo/i...age92kword.htm

Not exactly. By and large, the ones in suits murder fewer children.

Wolfgang
and yes, i do understand that not everyone thinks the distinction is
valid.....or important.

If we allow suits to include local business attire and customary dress, the
ones in suits are all too often the ones who start the process of war. I
have a greater appreciation of your position than you believe. And I do
acknowledge the validity and importance of the distinction.

--
Stev Lenon 91B20 '68-'69
Drowning flies to Darkstar

http://web.tampabay.rr.com/stevglo/i...age92kword.htm

rw:
Adults should be able to discuss politics civily. Retarded adolescents
can't, but I believe in redemption.


Good! I've been wondering what to do with those aging books of green
stamps.

--
Stev Lenon 91B20 '68-'69
Drowning flies to Darkstar

http://web.tampabay.rr.com/stevglo/i...age92kword.htm

"slenon" wrote in message
m...
Not exactly. By and large, the ones in suits murder fewer children.

Wolfgang
and yes, i do understand that not everyone thinks the distinction is
valid.....or important.

If we allow suits to include local business attire and customary dress, the
ones in suits are all too often the ones who start the process of war. I
have a greater appreciation of your position than you believe. And I do
acknowledge the validity and importance of the distinction.

Good post. Many would agree. ;-)
--
TL,
Tim
(It's a casual day at work today, so no murderous suits are in sight.)
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

Greg Pavlov writes:

The people who are most responsible for
Bush's victory are Bush and Clinton. Bush,
because he made the right moves, and Clinton
because his personal behavior tainted Gore
and made it difficult for Gore to build off
his vice presidency or to involve Clinton
in the campaign.

Which boils down to Gore ran a terrible campaign. He came off second best in
the debates, and his "re-inventing" himself made him look like a dork.
Historically, he should have won the election, being the Veep of a successful
administration. But, he blew it.
Dave

http://hometown.aol.com/davplac/myhomepage/index.html

"Stan Gula" wrote in
:

"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
. 1.4...
Aberlour! Is that that reasonable and tasty single malt I found for
Penns I, and can never remember what it is, no matter how many times
I'm told? Man, this hypothyroid **** is getting old. Gotta get that
dose right.

Yes, the Aberlour 10 has usually been a great deal. It recently went
up localy, but the 15 was a deal and it's really, really good.

Alas, Penns is off the docket for me this year...

Me too. You should come out to Western Mass. the weekend after Penns
(week before Memorial day?). We rent a campground on the Westfield...
I might be interested in your Beaverkill campout.


Now this sounds pretty good!! A family-friendly alternative. I'll think
about driving or flying., and I'll keep you posted for Beaverkill dates.


Scott

Typical lying from the looney left. Just like all these wannabe political
analysts that know absolutely nothing except how to cut and paste tripe into
their brains and bother folks in an outdoor oriented newsgroup. Take this
a$$wipe for example, he claims the administration killed 30k salmon due to
the agricultural needs of the area. Dig down just one thin layer of
information and we see that this is a Fuc*** reservoir that was built
SPECIFICALLY for the farmer's irrigation. Natural habitat my A$$. Now why
don't you idiot leftists get a clue that the educated public isn't buying
you trash. Have I said enough? Good now if you have something to contribute
to back country discussions go for it.
Chris

"Hayduke" wrote in message
news

Sound science. This administration lies and spins like no other.
Their reliance on politcally driven "science" led the the killing of
over 30,000 salmon on the Klamath to appease potato farmers; an
overturn of the snowmobile policy because the judge found their policy
"abritrary and capricious", will see many former BLM employees
involved in the San Rafael Swell land exchange going to prison for
undervaluing the land to be exchanged to line their own pockets, they
don't believe in Global Warming even though most scientists can prove
it is happening, former EPA Chief Whitman had to guts to leave due to
the pressure the administration placed on her to not use sound science
in her enforcement and rulemaking, the list goes on and on.

I love it. This administration will be taking a beating on their
environmental record in this year's election - not for their
environmental legacy but for their lying to the public with proof in
hand.

Ha!

Peace

On 28 Dec 2003 22:07:58 -0800, (Sportsmen
Against Bush) wrote:



"We'll base decisions on sound science," he said in 2001. "We'll call
upon the best minds of America to help us achieve an objective, which
is: cleaner air, cleaner water and a better use of our land."

(Greg Pavlov) wrote in
:

On 31 Dec 2003 17:26:44 GMT, irate (Dave LaCourse)
wrote:


Which boils down to Gore ran a terrible campaign. He came off second
best in the debates, and his "re-inventing" himself made him look like
a dork. Historically, he should have won the election, being the Veep
of a successful administration. But, he blew it.
Dave

I don't think he ran a terrible campaign. And he came
across as a "dork" in comparison to the non-threatening
anti-intellectual Bush. Yes, the Clinton administration
was highly successful, among the best of the last 100
years or so, but it was tainted, with the negatives grossly
exaggerated by the opposition.

Veeps have not in general faired well in recent history:
Nixon, Ford, Mondale, and Gore lost the first time around,
while Truman, Johnson, and Bush I lost after the first round.
Actually, if you think about it, the only full two-term
presidents since Roosevelt - Eisenhower & Reagan - were also
the only ones who were not prior Veeps.


Have you just wiped Clinton from your memory?? :-)

Scott