![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are they also planning on requiring circle hooks to be used with the bait?
California DF&G is starting to require circle hooks when bait fishing in some salmon fisheries. CA DF&G claims circle hooks have far less mortality than regular bait hooks. I haven't seen any studies that support circle hooks. Good luck! John "G. M. Zimmermann" wrote in message ... To anyone from Pennsylvania, partiularly the southeast portion of the state. I was just out fishing on the Delayed Harvest ALO section of the Tulpehocken when a gentlemen approched me and we struck up a convesation. He informed me that he was a member of the loacl chapter of trout unlimited and that the PA Fish & Boat commission was proposing changesing the reulations of the stream to allow the use of bait during the period of time. Such a change would be disasterous to the resident population of fish. Every other stream or lake with trout in it in this area is basicly fished out during the spring trout season, because most of the guys around here are only interested in catching as many keepers as they can. The Tulpehocken is the one place where most of the fishing pressure is from guys interested in catch and release. If any of you are intersted in preserving this fishery and its current regulation, please let the PA F&BC how you feel. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Lindsey" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... Are they also planning on requiring circle hooks to be used with the bait? California DF&G is starting to require circle hooks when bait fishing in some salmon fisheries. CA DF&G claims circle hooks have far less mortality than regular bait hooks. I haven't seen any studies that support circle hooks. Good luck! John Circle hooks were specifically devised for longline fishing, in order to guarantee a mortality rate of 100%. They actually come close. TL MC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Connor" wrote in message ... Circle hooks were specifically devised for longline fishing, in order to guarantee a mortality rate of 100%. They actually come close. Perhaps you are thinking of something else? A quick google returned: http://home.att.net/~sarasotadon/circle-hook.htm http://www.ccact.org/circle_hooks.htm http://www.dnr.state.md.us/fisheries...onal/crsb.html http://www.floridamarine.org/feature...e.asp?id=20414 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne Knight" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news ![]() "Mike Connor" wrote in message ... Circle hooks were specifically devised for longline fishing, in order to guarantee a mortality rate of 100%. They actually come close. Perhaps you are thinking of something else? A quick google returned: http://home.att.net/~sarasotadon/circle-hook.htm http://www.ccact.org/circle_hooks.htm http://www.dnr.state.md.us/fisheries...onal/crsb.html http://www.floridamarine.org/feature...e.asp?id=20414 Nope, do a search on "Longline hooks", or "Circle Longline Hooks". Apart from which, I used them for a while. For some fly-fishing. Practically all the fish I caught ( predominantly cod) ,were hooked in the throat, and impossible to release unharmed. The main reason for commercial fishermen using the circle hooks was that the fish was less likely to bleed, and consequently did not die on the line. A dead fish which may have been dead for a while, is not worth as much as live fish which can be freshly killed. These hooks were used on stationary unmanned lines. Quite a few studies have shown that the mortality rate on the lines when using such hooks is very low when compared to "J" hooks. This is true. The hook up and hold rates are also much higher, which in a commercial fishery means more dead fish. Many fish which would have escpaed from "J" hooks, are unable to escape from circle hooks. Owing to the jaw, lip and scissor hooking, ( thought to be as high as 95% in many cases and species), the fish does not bleed, and does not die quite so quickly on the unamnned line. Also, hook removal is facilitated. The properties are explained here quite well; http://www.stripersurf.com/circlehooks.html Some other interesting bits and pieces; http://www.sarasota-fla-fishing.com/circle.html For most active fly-fishing, these hooks are quite useless. They do not depend on the skill of an angler to set the hook. They depend on the fish moving away with the bait, and this usually causes a lip or scissor hook up. Any action on the part of the angler, apart from slowly tightening the line as the fish moves away will either cause the fish to eject the hook, or result in a bad hookup, in the throat etc. Some species of fish ( like Cod) tend to engulf their prey, and basically suck it down into their gullets. When they move, they are hooked in the gullet. For stationary, or "dead drift" fishing with either flies or bait, these hooks are incredibly efficient. This is however not really fly-fishing, it is more like trap setting. Which is precisely what the hooks were designed for. Sport anglers using such hooks will most certainly cause less fish mortality, for several reasons. If they move the hook, they either lose the fish, or hook it badly. Usually they will just lose it, although this depnds on the feeding habits of the species involved. If they donīt move the hook, the fish hooks itself, and usually in the lip, jaw or scissors. This is then easy to release undamaged. Most types of fly-fishing depend on the angler applying motion to the fly. This will not work with circle hooks. If the angler may not move the fly, then about 90% of flyfishing is no longer flyfishing as such, but more or less the same as bait fishing. TL MC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Connor" wrote in message ... Nope, do a search on "Longline hooks", or "Circle Longline Hooks". Apart from which, I used them for a while. For some fly-fishing. Practically all the fish I caught ( predominantly cod) ,were hooked in the throat, and impossible to release unharmed. The main reason for commercial fishermen using the circle hooks was that the fish was less likely to bleed, and consequently did not die on the line. A dead fish which may have been dead for a while, is not worth as much as live fish which can be freshly killed. Which going back to your statement which formed the basis for my question- "Circle hooks were specifically devised for longline fishing, in order to guarantee a mortality rate of 100%. They actually come close" Seems to me if they were designed to keep fish alive on long lines (which my posted links agreed with) that would not guarantee a mortality rate of 100%? I think the post you responded to initially was regarding use of live bait on circle hooks and not flies. Based on limited reading and understanding, they don't sound appropriate for artificial lures of any type, especially flies which agains supports your thesis. Or perhaps we have two people speaking the same language not understanding each other? Like that's never happened around here, ya know? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Outdoorsmen for Bush | Deggie | General Discussion | 6 | April 6th, 2004 01:13 PM |