![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter,
I sent to Mokai for their video. Got a dvd today. I am sold on the damn thing. The video shows it in some pretty rough water and it looks very stable. With things like they are concerning the Rapid, I don't know whether to buy it or not. Have to check with the Chief of Naval Ops, I guess. It could easily climb through the Currents into Wing Dam, and upstream through Chubs, probably all the way to the dam. Sure would open Chubs Pool which I have never really fished heavily, and trips to The Spawning Beds could be accomplished very quickly (15 mph) with the 6 hp 4 stroke water jet engine. No rudder to worry about either. Could we use in in Ontario? Dave http://hometown.aol.com/davplac/myhomepage/index.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave LaCourse wrote:
I sent to Mokai for their video. Got a dvd today. I am sold on the damn thing. The video shows it in some pretty rough water and it looks very stable. With things like they are concerning the Rapid, I don't know whether to buy it or not. Have to check with the Chief of Naval Ops, I guess. It could easily climb through the Currents into Wing Dam, and upstream through Chubs, probably all the way to the dam. Sure would open Chubs Pool which I have never really fished heavily, and trips to The Spawning Beds could be accomplished very quickly (15 mph) with the 6 hp 4 stroke water jet engine. No rudder to worry about either. ... You get up in arms when "corporate executives" want to build a condo in the area but you don't have a problem with buzzing up and down your favorite trout stream in a goddamn $3000 peewee jet ski ? Remember this picture ? http://www.flyrodreel.com/conservation112k.html -- Ken Fortenberry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:24:33 +0100, "riverman"
wrote: Let me try, Peter, and repay you for your gentle introduction to roff a few years ago. First, note that kayaks have decks, and sprayskirts to keep the water out of your lap. This applies to high-volume touring boats as well as smaller playboats, which is not what you are interested in. This gives you an 'inside' for your gear, but it is not quickly accessible, or conducive for a long rod. SOTs, OTOH, are like sitting on a surfboard, so there is no 'inside' for your gear: it sits on top with you. That makes it easy to get at, but also easy to fall out or for stuff to fall overboard. Kayaks turn over pretty easily, and beginners always swim when they do. This goes for SOTs also, so expect to lose some fishing gear when that happens. Kayaks are inherenly less stable than canoes, ride lower in the water so they swamp easier if you don't have the skirt on, are harder to steer straight, and get very antsy in moving water. Working the blade can be a bit uninstinctual, especially if you are panicking. You also sit closer to the surface, have no place to put your paddle when you are casting (and having it drift off is a bad thing), they are quite hard to get in and out of when you are on a steep shore, and you cannot take a **** out of them easily. Canoes, OTOH, are very stable, do not tip over easily (at least, as easily as a yak), you can stand to cast if you want, have a spacious 'inside' for your gear, including a fully-rigged rod, beach easily, can be turned over for a table, and you can take a friend. You can put your paddle and gear in it quickly and easily, can carry lunch, your gear won't wash overboard if you drop it, and you can even carry extra rods easily. The only real advantage to a yak is the weight for putting it on the roof of your car. However, some canoes (kevlar ones) are incredibly lightweight, although they are incredibly expensive, and there are many tricks for loading any canoe on a roof. Your best bet is to try each one a few times. I could not imagine trying to fish out of a yak, nor could I imagine any portable boat more appropriate and versatile than a canoe. --riverman Thanks for all of the info (though I don't remember what I did to deserve it. ![]() I haven't made up my mind by a long shot. I've noticed that even some of the cheaper canoes on these links are lighter than the yaks (Royalex Vagabond at 42 lbs. vs. a RIDE SOT at 58 lbs.) The SOT or one of the small canoes would probably be the choice - whatever works for me. The prices are about the same. We'll see what happens when Greg takes me for my dunkin'. ![]() Peter turn mailhot into hotmail to reply Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Charles" wrote in message ... On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:24:33 +0100, "riverman" wrote: Let me try, Peter, and repay you for your gentle introduction to roff a few years ago. Thanks for all of the info (though I don't remember what I did to deserve it. ![]() Let me refresh your memory, then. http://makeashorterlink.com/?T2E612D97 and go to the top of the thread. --riverman |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:15:09 +0100, "riverman"
wrote: "Peter Charles" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:24:33 +0100, "riverman" wrote: Let me try, Peter, and repay you for your gentle introduction to roff a few years ago. Thanks for all of the info (though I don't remember what I did to deserve it. ![]() Let me refresh your memory, then. http://makeashorterlink.com/?T2E612D97 and go to the top of the thread. --riverman ahh yes, I think it was the last line that was the clincher. ![]() ta Peter turn mailhot into hotmail to reply Visit The Streamer Page at http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "riverman" wrote in message ... "Peter Charles" wrote in message om... Ken Fortenberry wrote in message . com... Peter Charles wrote: ... It would seem to beat the canoe alternative. Why ? I mean for people of close to average proportions who can walk and chew gum at the same time, why does a sit-on-top kayak beat a solo canoe ? Getting in and out, control, ease of beaching, weathercocking, ease of putting on top of car, won't swamp. I'm neither an expert at canoes or yaks but given my physical limitations, a yak seems better. I'm prepared to be proven wrong. Let me try, Peter, and repay you for your gentle introduction to roff a few years ago. First, note that kayaks have decks, and sprayskirts to keep the water out of your lap. This applies to high-volume touring boats as well as smaller playboats, which is not what you are interested in. This gives you an 'inside' for your gear, but it is not quickly accessible, or conducive for a long rod. SOTs, OTOH, are like sitting on a surfboard, so there is no 'inside' for your gear: it sits on top with you. That makes it easy to get at, but also easy to fall out or for stuff to fall overboard. Kayaks turn over pretty easily, and beginners always swim when they do. This goes for SOTs also, so expect to lose some fishing gear when that happens. Kayaks are inherenly less stable than canoes, ride lower in the water so they swamp easier if you don't have the skirt on, are harder to steer straight, and get very antsy in moving water. Working the blade can be a bit uninstinctual, especially if you are panicking. You also sit closer to the surface, have no place to put your paddle when you are casting (and having it drift off is a bad thing), they are quite hard to get in and out of when you are on a steep shore, and you cannot take a **** out of them easily. Canoes, OTOH, are very stable, do not tip over easily (at least, as easily as a yak), you can stand to cast if you want, have a spacious 'inside' for your gear, including a fully-rigged rod, beach easily, can be turned over for a table, and you can take a friend. You can put your paddle and gear in it quickly and easily, can carry lunch, your gear won't wash overboard if you drop it, and you can even carry extra rods easily. The only real advantage to a yak is the weight for putting it on the roof of your car. However, some canoes (kevlar ones) are incredibly lightweight, although they are incredibly expensive, and there are many tricks for loading any canoe on a roof. Your best bet is to try each one a few times. I could not imagine trying to fish out of a yak, nor could I imagine any portable boat more appropriate and versatile than a canoe. --riverman I have a Klepper Aerius that doesn't turn over easily. You can in fact set on the gunwals and it will not flip over, you may fall out but it will remain upright. When your done paddling it knocks down into three bags which fit in the trunk of the car. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cannoes are just another way to take a bath, alway carry some soap and a
towel ( in a plastic bag) -never miss the opportunity for a bath. Canoes are inherently unstable if you need more proof heres some heavy physics for you. http://ntl.bts.gov/DOCS/narmain/naintro.html In a canoe you cg is to high and the angle phee in the diagram goe into the runaway mode damm quick. If you want historical references goggle up the Vasa, the Mary Rose, Crab boats in Alaska or numerous 3 rd world ferry capsizing tragedys. "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message om... Peter Charles wrote: ... It would seem to beat the canoe alternative. Why ? I mean for people of close to average proportions who can walk and chew gum at the same time, why does a sit-on-top kayak beat a solo canoe ? -- Ken Fortenberry |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "B J Conner" wrote in message In a canoe you cg is to high and the angle phee in the diagram goe into the runaway mode damm quick. Stop, stop; you're killin' me. :-) Joe F. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 02:58:38 GMT, "rb608"
wrote: "B J Conner" wrote in message In a canoe you cg is to high and the angle phee in the diagram goe into the runaway mode damm quick. Stop, stop; you're killin' me. :-) "Just when I think you've said the stupidest thing ever, you keep talking" /daytripper (Hank Hill, used without permission. Eff 'im ;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Speaking of the Curado 201 | luv2bafield | Bass Fishing | 7 | January 28th, 2004 09:16 PM |
Speaking of fly swaps... | Stan Gula | Fly Fishing | 5 | January 6th, 2004 08:33 PM |
Top Water - Still ??? | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 10 | December 2nd, 2003 03:16 PM |
Speaking of eating the whole thing . . . | Josh | Bass Fishing | 2 | November 6th, 2003 02:47 PM |