For Agent Users

"GaryM" wrote in message
. 3.44...
"Wolfgang" wrote in :


Well......yeah......or use a bogus name.

Everyone knows your real name is an anagram, so fess up Wolfgang, or
should I say, Mr. COWBANE FINE HIGGLES, or is WINNEBAGO FISC HEGEL?

Everyone knows that the Snedeker's speak only to the Fisc-Hegels........and
the Fisc-Hegels speak only to Dog.

Gnagflow

On 30 Aug 2004 21:51:23 GMT, (Jonathan Cook) wrote:


That said, I've been posting through google for a while, since
our local news service wasn't very reliable getting messages out.
But before that, I actually made a list (automatically, not by
hand) of several years worth of posts (all that C+R stuff!), and
took the time to ask google to remove them....However, I just
checked and they're back! It seems that google has decided that
I can't legally ask them to be removed!


Ask again. I know several people who persisted and eventually
they disappeared. The posts, I mean (been reading too much
about Ashcroft lately :-)

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:49:50 -0500, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


Yep. It's a lot like using a pseudonym.

Majestic Lobo

You must be the son of the late Finance Minister of Bwanda-Sgundi..

A pseudonym accomplishes that. But it's not the same in that when
you use your name, or a nickname that everyone knows is yours,
which is usually the case of the "regulars" in a newsgroup, you *are*
standing behind what you say.

"GregP" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:49:50 -0500, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


Yep. It's a lot like using a pseudonym.

Majestic Lobo

You must be the son of the late Finance Minister of Bwanda-Sgundi..

And Daddy promised to send me $75,000,000 just as soon
as......um......whatsis name who's holding the money gets my account number!


A pseudonym accomplishes that. But it's not the same in that when
you use your name, or a nickname that everyone knows is yours,
which is usually the case of the "regulars" in a newsgroup, you *are*
standing behind what you say.

Hm......o.k.......but then......hypothetically speaking, mind
you.......anyone who thinks that trying to keep his missives from being
archived is a "pussy" AND uses a pseudonym because he has ample reason to
want to remain anonymous is going to look kind of silly whichever end of it
you look from........right?

Wolfgang

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 20:29:33 -0500, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


Hm......o.k.......but then......hypothetically speaking, mind
you.......anyone who thinks that trying to keep his missives from being
archived is a "pussy" AND uses a pseudonym because he has ample reason to
want to remain anonymous is going to look kind of silly whichever end of it
you look from........right?

Silly ? I don't know. Maybe hypocritical, dishonest, and perhaps
even self-delusional, but I wouldn't go so far as to say he's silly
(else I'd have to slap an X-No-Archive on).

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 20:29:33 -0500, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


Hm......o.k.......but then......hypothetically speaking, mind
you.......anyone who thinks that trying to keep his missives from being
archived is a "pussy" AND uses a pseudonym because he has ample reason to
want to remain anonymous is going to look kind of silly whichever end of it
you look from........right?

Silly ? I don't know. Maybe hypocritical, dishonest, and perhaps
even self-delusional, but I wouldn't go so far as to say he's silly
(else I'd have to slap an X-No-Archive on).

"GregP" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:49:50 -0500, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


Yep. It's a lot like using a pseudonym.

Majestic Lobo

You must be the son of the late Finance Minister of Bwanda-Sgundi..

And Daddy promised to send me $75,000,000 just as soon
as......um......whatsis name who's holding the money gets my account number!


A pseudonym accomplishes that. But it's not the same in that when
you use your name, or a nickname that everyone knows is yours,
which is usually the case of the "regulars" in a newsgroup, you *are*
standing behind what you say.

Hm......o.k.......but then......hypothetically speaking, mind
you.......anyone who thinks that trying to keep his missives from being
archived is a "pussy" AND uses a pseudonym because he has ample reason to
want to remain anonymous is going to look kind of silly whichever end of it
you look from........right?

Wolfgang

"GaryM" wrote in message
. 3.44...
"Wolfgang" wrote in :


Well......yeah......or use a bogus name.

Everyone knows your real name is an anagram, so fess up Wolfgang, or
should I say, Mr. COWBANE FINE HIGGLES, or is WINNEBAGO FISC HEGEL?

I'm partial to Mr. COWBANE FINE HIGGLES. Y'all reckon we could vote on this?

Mark

"GaryM" wrote in message
. 3.44...
"Wolfgang" wrote in :


Well......yeah......or use a bogus name.

Everyone knows your real name is an anagram, so fess up Wolfgang, or
should I say, Mr. COWBANE FINE HIGGLES, or is WINNEBAGO FISC HEGEL?

Everyone knows that the Snedeker's speak only to the Fisc-Hegels........and
the Fisc-Hegels speak only to Dog.

Gnagflow

Wolfgang wrote:
"rw" wrote in message
...


If you don't want to be held responsible for what you post on Usenet,
then don't post on Usenet.


Well......yeah......or use a bogus name.

Most ROFF regulars know my real name, and for those who don't (and who
care) they can find it in an archived post. To save them the trouble,
it's Stephen Thomas Barnard and I live in Stanley, Idaho. I'm in the
phone book.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.