A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing Tying
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GRHE question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old October 14th, 2004, 07:19 PM
Mike O'Neil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GRHE question

riverman wrote:

"Tim J." wrote in message
...
riverman wrote:
And exactly where on the mask should I be harvesting fur for these? I
guess I'm not sure what the different parts of the mask are called.
Even the ear has at least 4 different qualities of fur (inside, on
the rim, the tip and the base).


I was taught to use the soft shorter stuff right at the base of the ear.
For a "spikier" look, I use the coarser hair, especially at the thorax.
--


I wonder if there's a link out there with a sketch of a hare's mask, and
sections marked out (like one of those butcher's guides for steaks, yum)
that name the regions and the properties for each, as well as which flies
those particular hairs are good for. Anyone? MC?

--riverman


check out http://www.flyfield.com/hare2.htm

mike o in knoxville
--
-----------------------------------------------
Mike O'Neil
Statistical Consulting Center
200 Stokely Management Center
University of Tennessee
Knoxville, TN 37916

865-974-8333



  #3  
Old October 14th, 2004, 07:57 PM
Mike Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GRHE question


"riverman" wrote in message
...
SNIP
I wonder if there's a link out there with a sketch of a hare's mask, and
sections marked out (like one of those butcher's guides for steaks, yum)
that name the regions and the properties for each, as well as which flies
those particular hairs are good for. Anyone? MC?

--riverman



http://www.flyfield.com/hare2.htm

for small flies, and if you want a smoother body, ( i.e softer hair which is
easily tapered etc) then use rabbit, or hare body fur. For very fine
dubbing, use rat or mouse.

Here are some other tips;
http://www.sexyloops.com/connorsmetre/grayling5.shtml

TL
MC


  #4  
Old October 25th, 2004, 10:31 PM
MichaelM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GRHE question


"Mike Connor" wrote in message
...


for small flies, and if you want a smoother body, ( i.e softer hair which

is
easily tapered etc) then use rabbit, or hare body fur. For very fine
dubbing, use rat or mouse.



Rabbit fur is one of my favourites. Bluey underfur for dun bodies and the
guard hairs for the grhe-effect. Whilst in principle I'd say rat fur should
be quite good, I would probably never ever find out for sure!


  #5  
Old October 14th, 2004, 06:30 PM
Dave LaCourse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GRHE question

Riverman writes:

I wonder if there's a link out there with a sketch of a hare's mask, and
sections marked out (like one of those butcher's guides for steaks, yum)
that name the regions and the properties for each, as well as which flies
those particular hairs are good for. Anyone? MC?

--riverman


For smaller flies, I don't use the hare's fur, but dubbing. I tie grhe down to
size 22 and do not use the fur. There is a lot of dubbing out there that could
be used. I use Hareline Dubbin and the fish don't seem to mind.

I also tie PTs using just brown thread and the gold wire rib. They have worked
*very* well on my Maine waters.

Dave





  #6  
Old October 14th, 2004, 06:21 PM
Charlie Choc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GRHE question

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:56:06 +0100, "riverman" wrote:

I wonder if there's a link out there with a sketch of a hare's mask, and
sections marked out (like one of those butcher's guides for steaks, yum)
that name the regions and the properties for each, as well as which flies
those particular hairs are good for. Anyone? MC?

Try Google, it found this right away: http://www.flyfield.com/hare2.htm
--
Charlie...
  #7  
Old October 14th, 2004, 07:20 PM
Larry L
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GRHE question


"riverman" wrote

The hare fur was all spikey and
made them rather bulbous


After years of tying I recently learned a new trick ( for this old dog )
For best slimness and control over dubbing, don't make a big effort to spin
it on the thread before starting to wrap. Just get it started and then the
first bit caught on the hook. Then as each wrap is completed use your
materials hand to tighten the noodle before the next wrap. This trick,
courtesy of a Rene Harrop video, makes it possible to dub MUCH tighter and
slimmer noodles and sculpt far nicer bodies, regardless of dubbing used.

FWIW, I have pretty much abandoned the GRHE and have replaced it in my box
of generic "could be most anything" ties with the Dave's Fox Squirrel ....
just seems to work better for me. I use a blend of natural belly fur and
synthetic antron blend the same color for the abdomen, and on smaller sizes
I usually pluck out most the guard hairs from the back fur used on the
thorax to help keep it from getting too spikey and large, leaving only a few
for "legs" and trying, always trying, to remember that "sparse = better"
.... as close to a truism as I can think of in fly tying and fishing


  #8  
Old October 19th, 2004, 10:02 PM
Lazarus Cooke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GRHE question


I've always thought of this as one of those flies that *ought* to look
pretty ragged - the more ragged the better, in my view.

Lazarus

--
Remover the rock from the email address
  #9  
Old October 19th, 2004, 11:23 PM
Mike Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GRHE question


"Lazarus Cooke" wrote in message
om...

I've always thought of this as one of those flies that *ought* to look
pretty ragged - the more ragged the better, in my view.

Lazarus

--
Remover the rock from the email address


Indeed. There are quite a few flies that do better the more ragged and tatty
they are. It is however very difficult to convince people to tie them like
that!

TL
MC


  #10  
Old October 20th, 2004, 02:42 PM
Scott Seidman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GRHE question

"Mike Connor" wrote in
:

Indeed. There are quite a few flies that do better the more ragged and
tatty they are. It is however very difficult to convince people to
tie them like that!

TL
MC




It's much more fun to tie them neat, and fish them to a state of ragged
effectiveness.

Scott
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question on downsizing SimRacer Bass Fishing 9 August 5th, 2004 12:56 AM
Lanyard question Conan The Librarian Fly Fishing 14 May 13th, 2004 02:36 PM
Question for you matchmen Dave Taylor UK Coarse Fishing 2 March 5th, 2004 02:23 PM
Tournament Question Chuck Coger Bass Fishing 7 October 1st, 2003 10:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.