![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Willi & Sue wrote:
Tim J. wrote: Guy Thornberg wrote: ???? Opinions. Never tied them. Weight, appearance, results, more? I don't notice much difference between beaded nymphs and using split shot as far as fishing goes, *BUT* it's much easier and faster to switch from beaded nymphs to dry when a hatch starts poppin'. Why is that? You just cut off thew nymph and slide off the weight? Not too hard. The split shot I've used has either a tendency to slide around on the tippet if too loose, or cause abrasion to the tippet if tight enough to stay put. Maybe I'm not doing something right. Ideas? -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Guy Thornberg" wrote Opinions. I carry two types ... unweighted ( what I mostly use ... with shot if needed ) and a few beadheads that I use, mainly, when I come upon a sight nymphing opportunity while fishing dries .... I snip off the dry tie on a BHPT, BHcrystalmidge or BOP and toss it to my fish, that being visible is nearly always in relatively shallow water feeding. With the two or three BH nymphs I routinely use I have a good feel for sink rate and I can often get that fish in a few casts ( I don't think pattern matters much, 95% of the time with nymphs ) OR I spook him and go back to dries and different fish. I pick BHs over traditional weighted flies for this simply because a glance tells me if I have weight or not, and I want to rig and make my appeal to the trout asap Settiing up for nymphing the water and moving up a stream the unweighted and shot works better, as I add and remove shot with some regularity on most streams |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guy Thornberg writes:
???? Opinions. Never tied them. Weight, appearance, results, more? In what I consider my home waters, it was illegal many years ago to add weight to your tippet/leader/line. And, for awhile anyway, it was illegal to have a weighted fly. The laws changed and beadheads became very popular to get the nymph down in the water column to where the fish were feeding. I used to use a beadhead to get the fly to the bottom, and an unweighted nymph (my intended lure) tied to the beadhead. It worked well, but not as well as split shot added to the leaders about 16 inches or so above the fly. Once split shot became legal, I stopped tying beadheads and concentrated on the same flies sans beads. I think there is probably some flash or sparkle to them and it may or may not attract the trout. But, prefer fishing without beads. When |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It depends on what you are tying. on longer flies such as a wooly bugger or
leech it adds an undulating motion - the up down motion on the retrieve as well as adding an attractant depending upon the bead color. But this can also be done with lead wire and crystal flash. It is a good and fast solution to many fly enhancements (flash, motion, sinking ability esp with tungsten) On the other hand I sometime felt that the bead heads on some flies were so common on a stream that it was a tip off to the trout that it was an artificial and not to be eaten. just some thoughts .... Steve Egge "Guy Thornberg" wrote: ???? Opinions. Never tied them. Weight, appearance, results, more? G |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guy Thornberg wrote:
???? Opinions. Never tied them. Weight, appearance, results, more? G I think that adding weight to the leader instead of using a weighted nymph of any sort lets you be more flexible. By adding and subtracting weight as needed, it allows you to put the fly in the right place in the water column in varying conditions. That, IMO, is far more important to success than fly choice or any other factor. I prefer unweighted nymphs with added weight. Willi |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Guy Thornberg" wrote Opinions. I carry two types ... unweighted ( what I mostly use ... with shot if needed ) and a few beadheads that I use, mainly, when I come upon a sight nymphing opportunity while fishing dries .... I snip off the dry tie on a BHPT, BHcrystalmidge or BOP and toss it to my fish, that being visible is nearly always in relatively shallow water feeding. With the two or three BH nymphs I routinely use I have a good feel for sink rate and I can often get that fish in a few casts ( I don't think pattern matters much, 95% of the time with nymphs ) OR I spook him and go back to dries and different fish. I pick BHs over traditional weighted flies for this simply because a glance tells me if I have weight or not, and I want to rig and make my appeal to the trout asap Settiing up for nymphing the water and moving up a stream the unweighted and shot works better, as I add and remove shot with some regularity on most streams |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guy Thornberg wrote:
???? Opinions. Never tied them. Weight, appearance, results, more? I don't notice much difference between beaded nymphs and using split shot as far as fishing goes, *BUT* it's much easier and faster to switch from beaded nymphs to dry when a hatch starts poppin'. -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Living with shooting heads | Peter Charles | Fly Fishing | 14 | July 14th, 2004 06:43 AM |