line choice for beginner

Ken Fortenberry wrote:


No, not really. While the typical top-poster is clueless and stupid and
you seem eager to describe yourself in those terms I would say that you
are better described as lazy, inconsiderate and pertinacious.

yup...excellent. and you haven't even met rachel yet. she agrees,
except for that pertinacious thing...she was unsure of its meaning
initially, but once i read the definition to her, she said, and i quote:
"damn, he nailed your ass."

btw...is bush's tie vibrating on anybody else's tv screen... talk
about a pertinacious prick.

actually, i agree i'm stupid and clueless, perhaps lazy, rarely
inconsiderate, definitely pertinacious. your scale of lazy and
inconsiderate is very different than mine...but, it does make for
interesting reading...

jeff (do not look at shrub's tie...aaiieeeee!!! it's hypnotic...i...i...
i'm gonna re-enlist, stop using empty words that embolden, my country
tis of thee, unscom, hiding...hiding...afraid of being caught...he was a
danger...uh, what was the question?...the oilfields... aaarrghhh...i
wouldn't be happy if i were occupied either...my blood wasn't
boiling...i was angry and sad...i grieve for...you know)

hi dave...welcome...i'm jeff and i'm clueless and stupid...
but...top post. don't allow convention or bottom posting cliques to
influence you. btw...have you understood anything shrub has said to this
point?

jeff


DaveMohnsen wrote:



Hi Jeff and Ken,
I usually think about snipping too much, or not enough. But I certainly
excelled in the latter category yesterday.
In my defense, heck there is no defense, I'm apparently clueless and stupid.
(on many different levels also)
DaveMohnsen

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:02:45 -0400, Jeff Miller
wrote:

hi dave...welcome...i'm jeff and i'm clueless and stupid...
but...top post. don't allow convention or bottom posting cliques to
influence you. btw...have you understood anything shrub has said to this
point?

must....not.....respond....

did he just say:

"i'm sure...um...um...something will pop up in my head in just a minute"

jeezus... please let something...anything...pop in his head...

jeff (and "let the discussions begin"...

daytripper wrote:

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:02:45 -0400, Jeff Miller
wrote:


hi dave...welcome...i'm jeff and i'm clueless and stupid...
but...top post. don't allow convention or bottom posting cliques to
influence you. btw...have you understood anything shrub has said to this
point?


must....not.....respond....

"daytripper" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:02:45 -0400, Jeff Miller

wrote:

hi dave...welcome...i'm jeff and i'm clueless and stupid...
but...top post. don't allow convention or bottom posting cliques to
influence you. btw...have you understood anything shrub has said to this
point?

must....not.....respond....

Personally I thought the President's Q&A was quite informative (in a totally
humiliating way).

Bob C.
Idahoan for ABB

Jeff Miller wrote:
snip
btw...is bush's tie vibrating on anybody else's tv screen... talk about
a pertinacious prick. ...

He was as scary tonight as I've ever seen him. He is obviously distraught,
disoriented and fearful. Poor thing, he means well, and I truly believe
that, but he is in WAY over his head and he's finally beginning to realize
it. When the Commander in Chief is discombobulated, be afraid.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Jeff Miller wrote:

snip btw...is bush's tie vibrating on anybody else's tv screen...
talk about a pertinacious prick. ...


He was as scary tonight as I've ever seen him. He is obviously distraught,
disoriented and fearful. Poor thing, he means well, and I truly believe
that, but he is in WAY over his head and he's finally beginning to realize
it. When the Commander in Chief is discombobulated, be afraid.


Fox News thought he did great. :-)

I didn't watch the press conference because I can't bear to listen to
him, much less watch him. I did read the text on the Web.

He doesn't mean well for the country as a whole. He means well for the
plutocracy he represents. He's an evil liar.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 03:11:29 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

Jeff Miller wrote:
snip
btw...is bush's tie vibrating on anybody else's tv screen... talk about
a pertinacious prick. ...

He was as scary tonight as I've ever seen him. He is obviously distraught,
disoriented and fearful. Poor thing, he means well, and I truly believe
that, but he is in WAY over his head and he's finally beginning to realize
it. When the Commander in Chief is discombobulated, be afraid.


I never felt sorry for his father, as I thought he was a conniving CIA
head type even as president, but I credited him with intelligence, if
not with any understanding of Americans who earn less than $200,000 to
$2,000,000 a year. The past couple of years, my sympathy for him has
increased enormously. What must it be like to produce a child so
publicly ignorant? So dedicated to continuing in paths proven to lead
to further destruction? I'd bet he sometimes sits around the house
with Barbara and says, "Damn, why didn't we just give that boy all the
cocaine his nose could stand and lock him in his room?"
--

rbc:vixen,Minnow Goddess,Willow Watcher,and all that sort of thing.
Often taunted by trout.
Only a fool would refuse to believe in luck. Only a damn fool would rely on it.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli

"JR" wrote in message ...
JR

Jeff wrote:

no, thank you, steve...

rw wrote:


my heart. nO, THANK YOU
dAVE
sUCKS iDEOLOGY,
DOES iT?


And thank you, Tim.

Tim J. wrote:

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in
message
...

the bottom of


Jeff wrote:


... i like tp'ing because it's contrarian *and* it bothers
fortenberry G.


Dave reposted that whole damn thing just to add "Thanks Mike", which
makes him every bit as clueless and stupid as your typical
top-poster.
My mentioning this should not be construed as being "bothered" by
it.

ALL of you from


I wasn't going to weigh in on this thread, but since my name has
been
invoked I will.

would like to thank


I lived on the Lamar River, have fished every friggin' foot of it
from the Mirror Plateau to the confluence of the Yellowstone and,
stories from Canuckian guides notwithstanding, I have NEVER found
it necessary to make a 65' cast to catch a fish. That's silly.

Having said that, I can cast a 5WF farther than a 5DT with the
same fly rod and I think that's why some recommend WF lines to
beginners. I no longer buy anything but DT.

for one


--
Ken Fortenberry



Thanks, Ken.




I

Mike Regarding the trend towards WF lines, I think you are right, but
Mike I have never seen any point to it. In my opinion it is mainly
Mike marketing and profit oriented thinking which causes
Mike manufacturers to sell so many in the first place. Advertising,
Mike and a large number of misconceptions does the rest.

Using a WF is a fast and easy solution for people who don't want to
play around with shooting heads (and attaching them to running lines).

--
Jarmo Hurri

Commercial email countermeasures included in header email
address. Remove all garbage from header email address when replying,
or just use .