Barak Hussein Obama? or Barak Hussein Osama?

Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against
him?

It's really quite comical.

Op

Opus wrote:
Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against
him?

It's really quite comical.



I saw something on CNN, or MSNBC today where they asked people if the US
was doing enough to capture Barack Obama. Hilarious responses.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:08:21 -0500, GM wrote:

Opus wrote:
Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against
him?

It's really quite comical.



I saw something on CNN, or MSNBC today where they asked people if the US
was doing enough to capture Barack Obama. Hilarious responses.

Well, the US oughta just nuke Freedonia right off the map unless they
turn him over immediately!

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:08:21 -0500, GM wrote:

Opus wrote:
Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against
him?

It's really quite comical.



I saw something on CNN, or MSNBC today where they asked people if the US
was doing enough to capture Barack Obama. Hilarious responses.

Well, the US oughta just nuke Freedonia right off the map unless they
turn him over immediately!

Were you the only incoming freshmen congressional representative interviewed
by Spy magazine?

Op

Opus wrote:
Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against
him?


Barak will be the first president since Clinton who
can actually talk.

"David Oznot" wrote in message
. ..
Opus wrote:
Has anyone else seen how the RIGHT is trying to use Obama's name against
him?


Barak will be the first president since Clinton who
can actually talk.

Possibly, but the question remains: Does Barak Hussein Obama still present
a threat to this country. :~^ )

Honestly, I think he should sit out this time around. He needs to get some
political time under his belt. He seems intelligent, articulate, and he is
a personable individual, but that don't necessarily make him presidential
material. We've got a moron for president now, we don't want a bright
individual who isn't mature enough to handle the issues that will be thrown
at him in that office.

I say let the Dems screw up by nominating Hillary--against her will--lose
the 2008 election and then in 4 years Obama and Edwards can run as
Independents and take all.

It'll be great for the country!

Op

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:30:55 -0500, "Opus"
wrote:

\

I say let the Dems screw up by nominating Hillary--against her will--lose
the 2008 election and then in 4 years Obama and Edwards can run as
Independents and take all.

I do hope that Hillary will never run for president, nor even vice.
First, I don't think a woman can be elected president any time in the
next decade or two. Second, Hillary has so much baggage that it'd bog
her right down.
--

r.bc: vixen
Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher, etc..
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless. Really.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli

"Cyli" wrote in message
...

I do hope that Hillary will never run for president, nor even vice.
First, I don't think a woman can be elected president any time in the
next decade or two. Second, Hillary has so much baggage that it'd bog
her right down.
--

r.bc: vixen

I'm afraid that ego will trump intellect, in her case. Just as it has in
Rah Dean's case, that is, if he had any intellect.

What's more distressing is that the Dem. party machine will likely think
nominating her is the right idea.

I really want to see a Hillary Clinton/George Clooney vs. Sam Brownback/Rick
Santorum election. This country ain't near ****ed-up enough, let's go all
the way!

Op

Cyli wrote:

I do hope that Hillary will never run for president, nor even vice.
First, I don't think a woman can be elected president any time in the
next decade or two. Second, Hillary has so much baggage that it'd bog
her right down.

The buzz around Barack is happening too early and he realizes this, as
evidenced in his own comments at last week's NH book signing, town-hall
thing. His flame could burn bright and brief, at least for the 08
contest. I do like his message though: amongst other things, the
audacious hope that a campaign can be fought with a respect for the
opponent. I just wonder if he'll still walk on water when he realizes he
has to go negative, either as a first strike, or in retaliation?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

GM wrote:

... I just wonder if he'll still walk on water when he realizes he
has to go negative, either as a first strike, or in retaliation?

Don't worry about Barack Obama's fighting ability. He's won,
and lost, elections for the Illinois legislature and Illinois
politics is anything but genteel.

--
Ken Fortenberry