Sad News

In article , says...

"Joe" wrote in message
.net...

I explained how I read his statement and the original target asked Opie
to explain what he meant if it wasn't how it sounded. Opie's only
response was to call me names.

Your ability to remember is no better than your ability to read or write!

I explained myself fully to *you* with out any name calling. I merely
sugested that you couldn't read.

Then you came back stating something incomprehensible and I tried to further
explain myself, and only then resorted tocallin' you, what you are, A MORON!

See Below to refresh your memory.

Op


Rather than continue to speculate on what Opie actually meant I felt
it was better to let him explain himself. Unless I missed it he hasn't
responded yet.


Don't know where you get that I can't read. It was a sarcastic
statement. Unemployment statistics are not handled differently in
different states.

"Well you claimed that I had made a "bogus claim" about livin' in a hi-tech
Mecca, when in fact I had made no such claim? And then you state that I
seem to think that unemployment stats are calculated differently in
different regions of the country?"

"Were you born a moron, or did you have to work real hard at becomin' one?"

Op

I've never seen anyone both top and bottom post at the same time.

Listen dickhead, is that better? I don't generally like to call names,
but it seems to be all you understand.

The question was, what did you mean by?

"Op --being right-handed, I can see that you wouldn't
understand that knot (obroff) all of us live in the Mecca of hi-
tech--".

I took it one way and instead of explaining yourself you called
names. I pointed out that you still hadn't explained what
you meant and you came back calling names again. Still not
explaining what you really meant.

I can only conclude that you really did mean what you said
and you're embarrassed because it's not supported by the
unemployment data.

If you want to continue to call names that's fine by me,
but hiding behind name calling is so grade school.

"Joe" wrote in message
.net...

I've never seen anyone both top and bottom post at the same time.

Don't get out much, do you?

Listen dickhead, is that better?

Hee, hee, hee. He said "dickhead." Hee, hee, hee.

I don't generally like to call names,

You're a liar.

but it seems to be all you understand.

And it's never occurred to you that the way things seem to you is a poor
indicator or what actually occurs in the real world? Oh, you are going to
be SUCH fun!

The question was, what did you mean by?

"Op --being right-handed, I can see that you wouldn't
understand that knot (obroff) all of us live in the Mecca of hi-
tech--".

See, there's that understanding thingy again. Nobody else "seems" to have
any trouble understanding what Mark meant. In fact, I feel confident in
stating for the record that EVERYBODY but you knows he meant not all uf us
live in the Mecca of hi-tech.

I took it one way

For reasons that will probably forever remain nearly as obscure to the rest
of us as they evidently are to you.

and instead of explaining yourself you called
names.

Well, you're an idiot......what did you expect?

I pointed out that you still hadn't explained what
you meant

It's going to be interesting to see how long you last in inviting abuse on
this one. Most of the nitwits who play this stupid game have relatively
little staying power, but they make up for it by beginning anew in every
thread they can find with a potential for self-immolation.

and you came back calling names again. Still not
explaining what you really meant.

Long about now, even you should be starting to get a pretty good idea of
what you're doing to yourself here. Well, things aren't always what they
should be......are they?

I can only conclude that you really did mean what you said

Actually, as you've demonstrated, you can conclude whatever you please.
This is bound to be a convenience because your conclusions thus far don't
seem to have anything whatsoever to do with the available evidence.

and you're embarrassed because it's not supported by the
unemployment data.

Go back and look once again at the text you quoted above. See if you can
find anyone to explain to you what in the world it might have to do with
"unemployment data."

If you want to continue to call names that's fine by me,
but hiding behind name calling is so grade school.

"Dickhead."

Wolfgang

In article , says...

"Joe" wrote in message
.net...
The question was, what did you mean by?

"Op --being right-handed, I can see that you wouldn't
understand that knot (obroff) all of us live in the Mecca of hi-
tech--".

See, there's that understanding thingy again. Nobody else "seems" to have
any trouble understanding what Mark meant. In fact, I feel confident in
stating for the record that EVERYBODY but you knows he meant not all uf us
live in the Mecca of hi-tech.

So I don't even give a damn anymore, but it appears that there are now
at least three of us (you, me, and Joe) who all took it that way.

Joe posted the unemployment rate in the "mecca of hi-tech" compared to
NC and was told that he couldn't read because that's not what Op
meant.

I don't get it, but EOT for me.
- Ken

wrote in message
...

...I don't get it, but EOT for me.

If it was EOT for you for everything you don't get, you'd simply wink out of
existence.

Wolfgang

In article , says...

wrote in message
...

...I don't get it, but EOT for me.

If it was EOT for you for everything you don't get, you'd simply wink out of
existence.

Wolfgang

13385.

wrote in message
...
In article , says...

wrote in message
...

...I don't get it, but EOT for me.

If it was EOT for you for everything you don't get, you'd simply wink out
of
existence.

Wolfgang

13385.

and counting.

Wolfgang
who is at a loss to explain why he deserves so many absolutely faithful
readers.

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
In article , says...

wrote in message
...

...I don't get it, but EOT for me.

If it was EOT for you for everything you don't get, you'd simply wink
out of
existence.

Wolfgang

13385.

and counting.

Wolfgang
who is at a loss to explain why he deserves so many absolutely faithful
readers.

For the same reason people watch auto races and train wrecks.

"Skwala" wrote in message
...

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
In article , says...

wrote in message
...

...I don't get it, but EOT for me.

If it was EOT for you for everything you don't get, you'd simply wink
out of
existence.

Wolfgang

13385.

and counting.

Wolfgang
who is at a loss to explain why he deserves so many absolutely faithful
readers.

For the same reason people watch auto races and train wrecks.

And what would that reason be?

Wolfgang
who supposes it has something to do with not enough retards to laugh at.

In article , says...

"Joe" wrote in message
.net...

I don't generally like to call names,

You're a liar.

You are just so cute.

"Joe" wrote in message
.net...
In article , says...

"Joe" wrote in message
.net...

I don't generally like to call names,

You're a liar.

You are just so cute.

Opinions vary. You are one of only half a dozen or so (probably) here who
can't think about me without some sort of sexual ideation occurring. I
believe most of those who give the matter any thought (though I cannot for
the life of me understand why they bother) will agree that this says a good
deal more about your peccadilloes than it does about my pulchritude. At any
rate, I can assure you that your little fantasy will forever remain
unconsummated.

Wolfgang
who could say that he's flattered......but would be lying.