Catch and Release

"Mike Connor" wrote in message
I have nothing
against homosexuals per se, as long as they behave like normal and
responsible members of society. A very large proportion do not, and I have
a
problem with that, and not only I.


Mike, when in a hole, you may want to stop digging.......this is some pretty
ignorant stuff right here, I have to say. I don't know where you have spent
your time, but I have, in the course of my life encountered a fair number of
gay people, male and female. The huge majority were extremely responsible,
contributory and salutory members of society. Where you would come up with
the ideas you state here is beyond me.
Tom

"Conan The Librarian" wrote in message
...
wrote:

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:56:44 -0800, "David Snedeker"
wrote:

I understand that quantities of burnt cork were found in Ernst
Rohm's effects.

Aw, he was probably just experimenting with rod handle repair
techniques...

Now *that* was funny. :-)


Chuck Vance

And you may be only one of the three people to get it.

Dave

"Frank Church" wrote in message
9.11...
"David Snedeker" wrote in
:

Being one of the instigators of this turn in the thread, let me say
don't read too much into his comment. Not that I agree with him but
remember that lots of us older citizens are less evolved on some of
these issues than folk just a few annum younger. So we tend to stumble
into politically incorrect boxes. Doesn't mean we are totally
retrograde (except maybe Frank). It might mean simply that we don't
look good in a bra and panties.

....in your case getting older has not given you more common sense or
wisdom, but an abundance of weird **** running through that mind of
yours.
I repeat, what a wonderful feeling to know that I don't have to suffer
the disease of the mind that you and other tin hat wearers have to deal
with.
I'm not one to Google up someone's posts on here, but it seems to me that
over the years that you have been infesting this group with your
confrontational style there have been pitifully few posts that relate to
flyfishing or anything even remotely associatied with said activity. At
least Gherke, who was taken to task many times over his outrageous
behavior here, did post some good advice, stories, etc. having to do with
flyfishing. You, on the other hand seem to exist here to regale us with
your ****ed up tin hat rantings, and of course someone almost always
challenges your tripe. That leads to being "snedekered", helluva legacy
to have your name turned into a verb connoting the sort of treatment you
hand out. This thread is over for me, an absolute waste of time to deal
with your ranting.

Frank Sr.
*PLONK*

Flyfishing. And here's to you, you limp wristed whiny assed old sissy
quitter. Ill miss you.

OK already, Im sorry. Flyfishing. When I said that maybe old guys just
didn't look good in a bra and panties, I didn't mean that ALL old guys or
that you wouldn't look OK in a bra and panties. Its the thought that
counts. Flyfishing.

Dave
Old guys in bra and panties is perfectly normal

"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
om...
SNIPSNIPPYSNIPSNIP

At the the risk of "smarmy political correctness" I'd
suggest that "retrograde" opinions SNIP SNIP SNIP should be kept to
oneself and not posted here. This suggestion applies especially to those
posting here from SNIPSNIP. Know what I mean ?

--

Ja. Zo, Aber wann Dieter die schwul konservative sprechen, "Sie touch meina
monkee, Zuckermauschen? "
Ich spreche . . . was?
Bitte?
Kein problem?
Donnerstag?
Spater?

Oder. . .
"Hat jemand gefurzt? Auf Weidersehen Schnuckel."

Dave

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"Willi" wrote in message
...
Wolfgang wrote:

Come on, Willi.....fess up. Even you must have had a good snicker over
Gilligan calling that "The best post in the history of roff."

Wolfgang
it's o.k.......we don't have to tell him.


Was that Gilligan? Here on ROFF? ****, I missed him. Gilligan dammit and I
missed him.

Dave

"David Snedeker" wrote in message
. ..

"Conan The Librarian" wrote in message
...
wrote:

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:56:44 -0800, "David Snedeker"
wrote:

I understand that quantities of burnt cork were found in Ernst
Rohm's effects.

Aw, he was probably just experimenting with rod handle repair
techniques...

Now *that* was funny. :-)


Chuck Vance

And you may be only one of the three people to get it.

Three? Big deal. Most of my wryly humorous historical references are so
obscure that even I don't get them.

Hah!.....like to see him top THAT!

Wolfgang
brought to you as a public service by the "let's subtly congratulate
ourselves on our singular perspicacity" bureau.
p.s. while i have never actually met chuck, i'd be willing to risk a shiny
new nickel on the proposition that he is IN FACT only one......no maybe
about it.

Wolfgang wrote:

"David Snedeker" wrote in message
. ..

And you may be only one of the three people to get it.

Three? Big deal. Most of my wryly humorous historical references are so
obscure that even I don't get them.

Hah!.....like to see him top THAT!

Wolfgang
brought to you as a public service by the "let's subtly congratulate
ourselves on our singular perspicacity" bureau.
p.s. while i have never actually met chuck, i'd be willing to risk a shiny
new nickel on the proposition that he is IN FACT only one......no maybe
about it.

I dunno ... according to Richard I'm somewhere in New Jersey and my
name is Bob. And though I think I'm currently in Texas and my name is
Chuck, I'm starting to have doubts. ...


Chuck Vance (because we all know Richard is never wrong ... and
he never lies)

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"David Snedeker" wrote in message
. ..

"Conan The Librarian" wrote in message
...
wrote:

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:56:44 -0800, "David Snedeker"
wrote:

I understand that quantities of burnt cork were found in Ernst
Rohm's effects.

Aw, he was probably just experimenting with rod handle repair
techniques...

Now *that* was funny. :-)


Chuck Vance

And you may be only one of the three people to get it.

Correction: ". . . only one of four people. . . . "


Three? Big deal. Most of my wryly humorous historical references are so
obscure that even I don't get them.

Hah!.....like to see him top THAT!


Fine. Well Ill bet you don't tell yourself Czech carp fishing jokes in your
sleep that you don't remember in the morning?

Dave
Prosim

"Thomas Littleton" wrote in message
news:aYJpf.5169$vJ4.1692@trnddc07...

"Mike Connor" wrote in message
I have nothing
against homosexuals per se, as long as they behave like normal and
responsible members of society. A very large proportion do not, and I
have
a
problem with that, and not only I.


Mike, when in a hole, you may want to stop digging.......this is some
pretty
ignorant stuff right here, I have to say. I don't know where you have
spent
your time, but I have, in the course of my life encountered a fair number
of
gay people, male and female. The huge majority were extremely responsible,
contributory and salutory members of society. Where you would come up
with
the ideas you state here is beyond me.
Tom


Tom, is it possible that it is a geographical thing? Maybe gays in Germany
(Europe is a much more liberal country than our own, according to some) are
simply much less inhibited than the gays in our part of the world? Maybe
this super uninhibited group of gays has finally upset the generally easy
goin' European liberals? Maybe Europeans are becoming afflicted with the
God-gene, and will amass as a super-Christian force willing to take on the
decadent counterfeit Christians in the good 'ol US of A?

MAYBE KENNY AND MIKE WILL KISS AND MAKE-UP, AND ALL WILL BE RIGHT IN THE
WORLD AGAIN?

NAH! Gays will simply attempt to horde WMDs and heat seekin' dildos, and
the rest of the world will have to go **** itself!

Op

"David Snedeker" wrote in message
. ..

"Wolfgang" wrote in message
...

"David Snedeker" wrote in message
. ..

"Conan The Librarian" wrote in message
...
wrote:

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:56:44 -0800, "David Snedeker"
wrote:

I understand that quantities of burnt cork were found in Ernst
Rohm's effects.

Aw, he was probably just experimenting with rod handle repair
techniques...

Now *that* was funny. :-)


Chuck Vance

And you may be only one of the three people to get it.

Correction: ". . . only one of four people. . . . "


Three? Big deal. Most of my wryly humorous historical references are
so
obscure that even I don't get them.

Hah!.....like to see him top THAT!


Fine. Well Ill bet you don't tell yourself Czech carp fishing jokes in
your
sleep that you don't remember in the morning?

Don't remember.

Wolfgang