![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#161
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "snakefiddler" wrote in message ... "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... You can skip right over Mailer, Miller, Jong, Hemingway, Stein, Steinem, Nin, Turing, Wilde, Findley, Barnard and Fortenberry. Um........Capote, maybe? Wolfgang ooh, nin- now that's my girl ;-) snake Well, if one has read Nin at all, another probably need not ask whether one has read "Delta of Venus". ![]() Wolfgang hey stevie!.....hey kennie!.....you should check it out......it's all about pu.......um.......well, never mind. |
#162
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "snakefiddler" wrote in message ... "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... You can skip right over Mailer, Miller, Jong, Hemingway, Stein, Steinem, Nin, Turing, Wilde, Findley, Barnard and Fortenberry. Um........Capote, maybe? Wolfgang ooh, nin- now that's my girl ;-) snake Well, if one has read Nin at all, another probably need not ask whether one has read "Delta of Venus". ![]() Wolfgang hey stevie!.....hey kennie!.....you should check it out......it's all about pu.......um.......well, never mind. |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
![]() rw wrote: Those are neutrinos, not quarks. don't you mean "neuticles"? |
#164
|
|||
|
|||
![]() rw wrote: Those are neutrinos, not quarks. don't you mean "neuticles"? |
#165
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#166
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#167
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 20:13:46 -0400, Jeff Miller
wrote: rw wrote: Those are neutrinos, not quarks. don't you mean "neuticles"? It always has to be about 40, doesn't it. -- Charlie... |
#168
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 20:13:46 -0400, Jeff Miller
wrote: rw wrote: Those are neutrinos, not quarks. don't you mean "neuticles"? It always has to be about 40, doesn't it. -- Charlie... |
#169
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "snakefiddler" wrote in message ... "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... You can skip right over Mailer, Miller, Jong, Hemingway, Stein, Steinem, Nin, Turing, Wilde, Findley, Barnard and Fortenberry. Um........Capote, maybe? Wolfgang ooh, nin- now that's my girl ;-) snake Well, if one has read Nin at all, another probably need not ask whether one has read "Delta of Venus". ![]() "one's" poor copy, (which was purchased back in the late seventies), has been so *ravished*, (how's that for an appropraite reference ;-)?), that "one" cannot pick it up without some of the pages falling out. i continue to work on her diary piece by peice...... Wolfgang hey stevie!.....hey kennie!.....you should check it out...... it's all about pu...... nah, that book, i would argue, makes a strong feminist statement, and is a work that reflects the unapologetic shedding of social sexual conventions assigned to women. some folks, however, may have trouble appreciating it in it's deeper context. my concern is that some folks are un-likely to see it as anything more than a collection of penthouse letters. it's all about pu...... ah, wolfie- i have a feeling you know it is about much more than that, (see the above statement) .um.......well, never mind. o.k. snake ;-) |
#170
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "snakefiddler" wrote in message ... "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... You can skip right over Mailer, Miller, Jong, Hemingway, Stein, Steinem, Nin, Turing, Wilde, Findley, Barnard and Fortenberry. Um........Capote, maybe? Wolfgang ooh, nin- now that's my girl ;-) snake Well, if one has read Nin at all, another probably need not ask whether one has read "Delta of Venus". ![]() "one's" poor copy, (which was purchased back in the late seventies), has been so *ravished*, (how's that for an appropraite reference ;-)?), that "one" cannot pick it up without some of the pages falling out. i continue to work on her diary piece by peice...... Wolfgang hey stevie!.....hey kennie!.....you should check it out...... it's all about pu...... nah, that book, i would argue, makes a strong feminist statement, and is a work that reflects the unapologetic shedding of social sexual conventions assigned to women. some folks, however, may have trouble appreciating it in it's deeper context. my concern is that some folks are un-likely to see it as anything more than a collection of penthouse letters. it's all about pu...... ah, wolfie- i have a feeling you know it is about much more than that, (see the above statement) .um.......well, never mind. o.k. snake ;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For you Shimano spinning reel users | Brad Coovert | Bass Fishing | 0 | June 14th, 2004 12:13 AM |
Penn 555GS users manual | nhmsb2 | General Discussion | 0 | November 22nd, 2003 03:55 AM |
Rangers keep ATV users on road to conservation | Jim | Fly Fishing | 0 | September 23rd, 2003 07:16 AM |