He was a good dog

On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 11:00:26 -0800, Mike
wrote:

I think you will discover that Mr.Miller is far too decent and
sensible to fall for any of your bull****. Indeed, he has already
proven himself to be so.

I think that I will discover that Jeff is well aware of your past
little snits, your supercilious behavior, your arrogant come-backs
when people disagree with you.

A question for anyone on roff that has some spare time: How many
times as Mike Connor "left" roff in a snit, "never to return." I'm
guessing 12. Could be higher.

Davey

On 4 Nov, 20:43, "Bob Weinberger"
wrote:

Think about that. Obviously, responding to his baiting hasn't worked. Why do
you think your above statement has any validity, since in an unmoderated
forum the participants control nothing but their own behavior, and someone
who truly doesn't care what others think will not be influenced by their
protests?

Bob Weinberger

Mr.Weinberger, although you may not realise it, I respect you and I
would always listen to what you had to say, and take it into
consideration.

Much of what you say, and you have obviously thought carefully about
it, just as carefully as you composed the post, may seem, or indeed
even actually be correct, either intrinsically, or from your point of
view.

Unfortunately, none of it solves any of the present problems, not for
me, and not for anybody else. The only way to stop somebody who does
not care about right and wrong, or other people, is to force him to
stop.

The psychology of the whole affair may be mildly academically
interesting, but I am only concerned with the practical effects.

Fortenberry is a canker, and it is not a good idea to ignore cankers.
They eventually destroy the bodies on which they feed. Whether you
realise it or not, and I suspect you do, Fortenberry is directly and
principally responsible for the majority of problems on this group. He
has damaged and abused very large numbers of people. This is only
possible because people kept quiet and allowed him to do so.

With all due respect Sir, although I can understand and even value
your point of view, and the care you have taken in presenting it, I
disagree with it, and I am duty bound to pursue my own course of
action in preventing Fortenberry from abusing and damaging anybody
else. I am not sure you even grasp the depth of upset I experienced as
a result of this man´s actions, and I would certainly hate to think I
allowed him, even tacitly, to do that to anybody else. This campaign
is obviously having an effect already. His rants are becoming more
unsure, the more people he perceives as "defending" me, or at least
attacking him for his actions, the more he is forced into a corner. He
craves sympathy and attention, and control over others. Take those
away, and he is powerless.

That is now my sole objective. I don´t care what others may think of
me as a result, and unless somebody comes up with a viable solution to
achieve the same end, I will continue to pursue my objectives in this
regard, until I either succeed, or die, or he retires or dies.

Because I think it is the right thing to do, and because I can.

Regards and best wishes

Mike Connor.

Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Mike wrote:
You are going down Kennyboy, people are going to fry your vicious
vindictive ass.

No, you crazy loon, people are going to do no such thing.
snip
... What kind of a sick ****
would take the occasion of a beloved pet's death to issue a
flurry of vituperative personal attacks ?

Those who defend you here are in reality being less kind to
you than those of us who goad you into doing your worst. The
former are perpetuating a lie, the latter revealing a truth.

Getting rattled aren´t you? ...

LOL !! Speaking the truth never rattles me, actually it's
rather invigorating.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On 4 Nov, 21:16, Ken Fortenberry wrote:

Getting rattled aren´t you? ...

LOL !! Speaking the truth never rattles me, actually it's
rather invigorating.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Doubtless the novelty effect Kennyboy, makes a change from lying eh?
You do not respect truth Kennyboy, or even right and wrong, but it
will still crush you.

MC

Bob Weinberger wrote:

... I respond
(not attack - it is not my style to attack anyone) to you rather than to him
in the hope (most likely in vain) that I can make you see how irrational
your behavior is. It would be pointless to do so with Ken as he doesn't
care.

He has certainly displayed sadistic behavior in how he baits you & plays to
your apparent inability to keep from returning for more. You consider him a
sadist yet keep coming back again and again for more of the same. What does
that make you ? (which begs the question - If a sadist picks on a masochist,
is he truly being a sadist?)

LOL !! Good question.

I freely admit to deriving pleasure in seeing a pompous, arrogant,
know-it-all, piece of homophobic **** like His Loony Mikeness make
a complete fool and utter ass of himself in a forum where his voice
used to be respected. As to whether that's sadistic or not, you're
right, I don't care. It's fun for me, to hell with the rest.

I would submit that by trying to excuse, explain or defend His
Loony Mikeness' despicable tirades and foul-mouthed rants you are
actually being more of a sadist than those of us who belittle him.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
LOL !! Speaking the truth never rattles me, actually it's
rather invigorating.
...
You do not respect truth Kennyboy, or even right and wrong, but it
will still crush you.

You haven't answered the question:

What kind of a sick **** would take the occasion of a beloved
pet's death to issue a flurry of vituperative personal attacks ?

Well ?

--
Ken Fortenberry

Mike wrote:


I think you will discover that Mr.Miller is far too decent and
sensible to fall for any of your bull****. Indeed, he has already
proven himself to be so.

There is a lot to be said for being loyal to a friend, and I actually
admire that, but there comes a time when one must allow good sense to
prevail.


actually, i consider dave a friend...he has always been decent and
generous in his direct dealings with me.

while i have expressed disagreement with some of the stuff he says here,
and will undoubtedly continue to do so, thus far our disagreements have
been about "stuff" and we have not been disagreeable toward one another.

i fall for bull**** daily...but once i get a good sniff of it *and* get
tainted by it, i tend to try to clean myself off and not fall in it a
second time.

being called a liar despite my honest statements about a lake which
other neutral observers personally verified, caught fish in, and
photographed ... well, it stunk sufficiently for me. so, i reckon
fortenberry and i are both best served by simply staying away from one
another and by having no direct dealings. i'm sure we both prefer it.
like you, i take the bait on occasions.

my wife...who purports to love me...frequently remarks on my lack of
good sense. a fair assessment, no doubt. yet, it's the sense i've
got...she's still with me after all these years, and it's served me well
enough that i hope to keep it for a while longer.

anyway, i have learned i can do little to affect what occurs here. but,
from time to time, i still waste a few hours in one-finger typing
giving expression to my own feeble thoughts about stuff and keeping in
touch with old friends in a public way.

jeff

Mike Connor on Bob Weinberger:

"Maybe some **** like you will also find it funny, and make a point of
telling you so?"

My, my. You change your stripes so quickly.

If the man disagrees with you again, will he remain a ****, or will
you promote him to ass killer?

On 4 Nov, 21:53, Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
LOL !! Speaking the truth never rattles me, actually it's
rather invigorating.
...
You do not respect truth Kennyboy, or even right and wrong, but it
will still crush you.

You haven't answered the question:

What kind of a sick **** would take the occasion of a beloved
pet's death to issue a flurry of vituperative personal attacks ?

Well ?

--
Ken Fortenberry

You are the only sick **** I know Kennyboy. It is quite obvious that
your pandering for sympathy is merely another aspect of your craving
for the control and manipulation of others. As others have also noted.
It is typical behaviour for a psychopath. As is complete disregard for
right and wrong, the feelings or rights of others, and the delusion
that you are always right, and any means to force your views on others
are thus justifiable.

Given that you have ALL the clinical symptoms of a psychopath, it is
highly unlikely that you even loved your dog, much less grieved for
it. It was just another object in your limited psychopathic world.
When it died, it gave you an opportunity to pander for sympathy.

Quite apart form which Kennyboy, you rely on people being too decent
and civilised to treat you in the same manner you treat them, but a
few of us are perfectly well aware of what you are, and the tricks you
use, so this ploy no longer works.

I don´t know why you are a psychopath Kennyboy, and I don´t care. I
merely wish to stop you abusing and manipulating people. I will also
succeed.

No matter what you do, you will get no sympathy or support here ever
again, except from the few dumb asslickers for whom you have the same
contempt as for everybody else, which they will no doubt eventually
discover to their cost, neither will you be able to manipulate or
abuse anybody here ever again.

I Know what you are Kennyboy, and I know what makes you tick. There is
nothing you can do about it.

Beyond that, you are of no particular interest to me. Merely a
dangerous pest which has to be dealt with.

MC

Mike wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
You haven't answered the question:

What kind of a sick **** would take the occasion of a beloved
pet's death to issue a flurry of vituperative personal attacks ?

You are the only sick **** I know Kennyboy. ...

Answer the question, you disgusting piece of ****.

What kind of a sick **** would take the occasion of a beloved
pet's death to issue a flurry of vituperative personal attacks ?

--
Ken Fortenberry