A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The politics of nature



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old January 3rd, 2004, 03:45 AM
Strider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The politics of nature

On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 22:39:35 -0500, "Frank Reid"
moc.deepselbac@diersicnarf wrote:

What you say is true, however, when I see a small segment of the
population, notably liberals, willing to cede the sovereignty of the
US, I must oppose them.


If true, i.e. the liberals are part of what makes this country great, then
this leads me to believe you don't like that dualism formed by the
conjunction of the two, as you continually denigrate it. By extension, you
don't like the rule of law, formed by that dualism. That rule of law is
based upon the Constitution. Why do you hate America so much?
Secondly, who is willing to cede our sovereignty and how? Could it be
bowing to international pressure on steel prices (George Jr.)? Having NATO
troops stationed on US soil (Ronny)? Using the United Nations to bolster
our own forces (including Russian ships to haul our troops)(George Sr.)?
Face it, its an international world. Oh, and by the way, the Democratic
party (those pesky liberals) are not a small segment, but close to 50% of
the voting population.


Ah, Frank, you are getting the bull**** engine going again.

BTW. Liberals don't even make up half of the Democrat voters.

Here is something I found you need to know. Americans are no longer
quite as subject to leftwing lies as we once were.

"The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form of law
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie"

Strider
  #162  
Old January 3rd, 2004, 03:46 AM
Mike Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The politics of nature


"Wolfgang" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...

"There are more questions than answers,. the more I find, the less I
know.......,"

I know the feeling, it is nevertheless more than somewhat troubling that you
just canīt be bothered! The brief was ( remember? all that long time ago)

"Educate the ignorant masses". You can not simply give up because you
failed! This is tantamount to treason!

Carry on like this, and people will think you are a conservative, or a
liberal, or a "commie". Or that your newsreader is ****ed!

You are probably right, and "it donīt make no never mind anyway".

Happy new year anyway.

TL
MC


  #163  
Old January 3rd, 2004, 03:48 AM
rb608
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The politics of nature


"rw" wrote in message
Churchill was very quotable, but he obviously stole that one. Here are
some ORIGINAL Chruchill quotes that are more apropos of current events:


Churchill is often given credit for that "yes, but tomorrow I'll be sober"
quote (also attributed to W.C. Fields). Is that one really his?

I know he gets credit for the exchange, "If you were my husband, I'd give
you poison." "If I were your husband, I'd drink it." Can't remember the
exact quotes or the woman's name.

Joe F.


  #164  
Old January 3rd, 2004, 03:49 AM
Hayduke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The politics of nature

ROFLMAO

Too much. Go back to school and learn the art of elementary logic and
reasoning, Strider. At least, try to bring some factual information
to the newsgroup for discussion.

LOL

Peace

Ah, Frank, you are getting the bull**** engine going again.

BTW. Liberals don't even make up half of the Democrat voters.

Here is something I found you need to know. Americans are no longer
quite as subject to leftwing lies as we once were.

"The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form of law
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie"

Strider


  #165  
Old January 3rd, 2004, 03:54 AM
Strider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The politics of nature

On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 04:16:47 +0100, "Mike Connor"
wrote:


"Strider" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
.. .
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 17:41:19 -0800, "Dan" wrote:

You guys having fun?


LOL. All I can assume is that it's some bizarre kind of cyber staring
match.

Strider


Ineffably, and you are losing.

Do you possess any nickels at all? Shiney or otherwise?

TL
MC

Who made you the refree?

Strider
  #166  
Old January 3rd, 2004, 03:55 AM
Strider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The politics of nature

On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 19:49:23 -0800, Hayduke wrote:

ROFLMAO

Too much. Go back to school and learn the art of elementary logic and
reasoning, Strider. At least, try to bring some factual information
to the newsgroup for discussion.

LOL

Peace


Factual info is of no use to liberals.

Strider


Ah, Frank, you are getting the bull**** engine going again.

BTW. Liberals don't even make up half of the Democrat voters.

Here is something I found you need to know. Americans are no longer
quite as subject to leftwing lies as we once were.

"The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form of law
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie"

Strider


  #167  
Old January 3rd, 2004, 03:56 AM
Mike Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The politics of nature


"Strider" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...


Ah yes, " whether ī tis nobler in the mind..............."

Or just cross post the crap, and **** up everybody else?

A terrible quandary.

You have my eternal sympathy. ( at least as long as I live).

TL
MC


  #168  
Old January 3rd, 2004, 03:57 AM
Strider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The politics of nature

On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 19:45:25 -0800, Hayduke wrote:

Let me play on your words

When I see a small segment of the population, notably wealthy
conservatives who believe they compose a silent majority, willing to
cede the sovereignty of the US and liberty of the masses at the
expense and detriment of future generations, I must oppose them.

Wow.

Peace


Are you also opposed to wealthy liberals who also pretend to know
what's best for us peons?

Strider

On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 03:12:06 GMT, Strider wrote:

What you say is true, however, when I see a small segment of the
population, notably liberals, willing to cede the sovereignty of the
US, I must oppose them.

Strider


  #169  
Old January 3rd, 2004, 04:01 AM
Mike Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The politics of nature


"Strider" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
BTW. Liberals don't even make up half of the Democrat voters.

Here is something I found you need to know. Americans are no longer
quite as subject to leftwing lies as we once were.

"The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form of law
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie"

Strider


Americans? Jesus H. Christ. Some of you dumb *******s even believe you have
a monopoly on lies.

Left? Right? Centre? It all depends where you happen to be sitting at the
time, and who is shooting at you.

Luckily for most of of us non-Americans, ( at least without oil), your aim
is about on a par with your intelligence.

MC



  #170  
Old January 3rd, 2004, 04:08 AM
Mike Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The politics of nature


"Hayduke" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
Let me play on your words

When I see a small segment of the population, notably wealthy
conservatives who believe they compose a silent majority, willing to
cede the sovereignty of the US and liberty of the masses at the
expense and detriment of future generations, I must oppose them.

Wow.

Peace

On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 03:12:06 GMT, Strider wrote:

What you say is true, however, when I see a small segment of the
population, notably liberals, willing to cede the sovereignty of the
US, I must oppose them.

Strider



"Silent majority" ??????????.

There is no such thing as a silent majority. It is a contradiction in
terms. Most political majorities, ( those who win), are around about
fifteen to twenty percent of the total possible, and are anything but
silent. "Vociferous" would be an understatement.

All you need is time and money, and a lot of dumb arseholes who are willing
to support you, even when you bull****.

What a terrible waste of resources, and not only in America.

It is quite immaterial which particular label your arsehole of choice
happens to be wearing at the time, ( this too is variable).

Thinking is going out of fashion it seems.

MC


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT Politics Mike Connor Fly Fishing 103 December 29th, 2003 09:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.