Apparently something from Reeve himself...

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:46:46 -0600, rw
wrote:

wrote:

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:07:14 -0600, rw
wrote:


wrote:

OK, but I'm not sure that's correct, and certainly not what I was trying
to convey. From what I know about it (which, admittedly, is pretty
limited),

... and which, of course, doesn't stop you from stating an uninformed
opinion.


Er, nope, wrong yet again...whatsamatter - have you been snorting
potatoes again or something - a _limited_ amount of knowledge is not
the same as "uninformed," and moreover, when you get down to it, by
definition, your knowledge is limited, as well and as such, your opinion
of my opinion would be based on your own limited knowledge...

In this case, my knowledge is quite a bit less limited than yours.

Maybe, maybe not, and there's really no way to determine something like
that, but I'm younger, smarter, richer, better looking, and I don't
suffer from penis envy, so I guess if you actually do have more
knowledge about embryonic stem cells, it's Nature's little attempt at
giving you SOMETHING...

Modestly,
R

wrote:

Maybe, maybe not, and there's really no way to determine something like
that, but I'm younger, smarter, richer, better looking, and I don't
suffer from penis envy, so I guess if you actually do have more
knowledge about embryonic stem cells, it's Nature's little attempt at
giving you SOMETHING...

Modestly,
R

How old are you?

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

wrote:

Maybe, maybe not, and there's really no way to determine something like
that, but I'm younger, smarter, richer, better looking, and I don't
suffer from penis envy, so I guess if you actually do have more
knowledge about embryonic stem cells, it's Nature's little attempt at
giving you SOMETHING...

Modestly,
R

How old are you?

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

"rw" wrote in message
m...
wrote:

Maybe, maybe not, and there's really no way to determine something like
that, but I'm younger, smarter, richer, better looking, and I don't
suffer from penis envy, so I guess if you actually do have more
knowledge about embryonic stem cells, it's Nature's little attempt at
giving you SOMETHING...

Modestly,
R

How old are you?


29, 128, $180K+, 10, 9.5 inches baby.

--riverman
(Gods gift to humanity.)

"rw" wrote in message
m...
wrote:

Maybe, maybe not, and there's really no way to determine something like
that, but I'm younger, smarter, richer, better looking, and I don't
suffer from penis envy, so I guess if you actually do have more
knowledge about embryonic stem cells, it's Nature's little attempt at
giving you SOMETHING...

Modestly,
R

How old are you?


29, 128, $180K+, 10, 9.5 inches baby.

--riverman
(Gods gift to humanity.)

riverman wrote:
"rw" wrote in message
m...
wrote:

Maybe, maybe not, and there's really no way to determine something
like that, but I'm younger, smarter, richer, better looking, and I
don't suffer from penis envy, so I guess if you actually do have
more knowledge about embryonic stem cells, it's Nature's little
attempt at giving you SOMETHING...

Modestly,
R

How old are you?

29, 128, $180K+, 10, 9.5 inches baby.

splork!
(10? - what was the scale?)
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

riverman wrote:
"rw" wrote in message
m...
wrote:

Maybe, maybe not, and there's really no way to determine something
like that, but I'm younger, smarter, richer, better looking, and I
don't suffer from penis envy, so I guess if you actually do have
more knowledge about embryonic stem cells, it's Nature's little
attempt at giving you SOMETHING...

Modestly,
R

How old are you?

29, 128, $180K+, 10, 9.5 inches baby.

splork!
(10? - what was the scale?)
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj

riverman wrote:
"rw" wrote in message
m...

wrote:

Maybe, maybe not, and there's really no way to determine something like
that, but I'm younger, smarter, richer, better looking, and I don't
suffer from penis envy, so I guess if you actually do have more
knowledge about embryonic stem cells, it's Nature's little attempt at
giving you SOMETHING...

Modestly,
R

How old are you?



29, 128, $180K+, 10, 9.5 inches baby.

--riverman
(Gods gift to humanity.)

OK. In that case, I'm richer. :-)

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

riverman wrote:
"rw" wrote in message
m...

wrote:

Maybe, maybe not, and there's really no way to determine something like
that, but I'm younger, smarter, richer, better looking, and I don't
suffer from penis envy, so I guess if you actually do have more
knowledge about embryonic stem cells, it's Nature's little attempt at
giving you SOMETHING...

Modestly,
R

How old are you?



29, 128, $180K+, 10, 9.5 inches baby.

--riverman
(Gods gift to humanity.)

OK. In that case, I'm richer. :-)

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:41:06 -0600, "Kerry Evans"
wrote:

Actually, embryonic stem cell research shows very little positive
promise.
Adult stem cell research, OTOH, could perhaps produce some positive
results.
KE


SNIP SNIP show short-term promise
as cure-alls, ala Edwards' campaigning.

But again, most importantly IMO, the only real question is should the
Fed fund embryonic cell research or not. Also IMO, given the complete
overview and current knowledge to this point, the Fed should stay
_completely_ out of it as far as funding or beyond anything other than a
limited control as to methodology.

TC,

Yep, just leave it to the corp sector, because they are just soooooo
responsible.
Fact is that most medical and basic bio research has been done by the public
sector, and ripped off via joke licensing fees by the private sector. And
now the Bushies have been quietly hollowing out the NIH research structure.

Dave