![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guy writes:
My preference has been to not use split shot due to the problems with casting and wind knots. That can be a problem when using split shot. It has a hinge effect. Best way to do it is to make a circle cast. Lefty Kreh demonstrated it once at a show. When your fly gets down stream, simply pick it up and cast upstream in one motion. It ain't pretty, but it works. No false casting involved. Have you, or anyone, experienced a definite increase with the use of bead heads compared to traditional weighted nymphs? (Yes, a loaded question). I don't know, but I really don't consider using the bead an advantage. They probably serve a purpose in some anglers bag of tricks, but I have yet to really see a difference. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It depends on what you are tying. on longer flies such as a wooly bugger or
leech it adds an undulating motion - the up down motion on the retrieve as well as adding an attractant depending upon the bead color. But this can also be done with lead wire and crystal flash. It is a good and fast solution to many fly enhancements (flash, motion, sinking ability esp with tungsten) On the other hand I sometime felt that the bead heads on some flies were so common on a stream that it was a tip off to the trout that it was an artificial and not to be eaten. just some thoughts .... Steve Egge "Guy Thornberg" wrote: ???? Opinions. Never tied them. Weight, appearance, results, more? G |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It depends on what you are tying. on longer flies such as a wooly bugger or
leech it adds an undulating motion - the up down motion on the retrieve as well as adding an attractant depending upon the bead color. But this can also be done with lead wire and crystal flash. It is a good and fast solution to many fly enhancements (flash, motion, sinking ability esp with tungsten) On the other hand I sometime felt that the bead heads on some flies were so common on a stream that it was a tip off to the trout that it was an artificial and not to be eaten. just some thoughts .... Steve Egge "Guy Thornberg" wrote: ???? Opinions. Never tied them. Weight, appearance, results, more? G |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guy Thornberg wrote:
???? Opinions. Never tied them. Weight, appearance, results, more? I don't notice much difference between beaded nymphs and using split shot as far as fishing goes, *BUT* it's much easier and faster to switch from beaded nymphs to dry when a hatch starts poppin'. -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guy Thornberg wrote:
???? Opinions. Never tied them. Weight, appearance, results, more? I don't notice much difference between beaded nymphs and using split shot as far as fishing goes, *BUT* it's much easier and faster to switch from beaded nymphs to dry when a hatch starts poppin'. -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guy Thornberg wrote:
???? Opinions. Never tied them. Weight, appearance, results, more? G I think that adding weight to the leader instead of using a weighted nymph of any sort lets you be more flexible. By adding and subtracting weight as needed, it allows you to put the fly in the right place in the water column in varying conditions. That, IMO, is far more important to success than fly choice or any other factor. I prefer unweighted nymphs with added weight. Willi |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim J. wrote:
Guy Thornberg wrote: ???? Opinions. Never tied them. Weight, appearance, results, more? I don't notice much difference between beaded nymphs and using split shot as far as fishing goes, *BUT* it's much easier and faster to switch from beaded nymphs to dry when a hatch starts poppin'. Why is that? You just cut off thew nymph and slide off the weight? Not too hard. Willi |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Willi & Sue wrote:
Tim J. wrote: Guy Thornberg wrote: ???? Opinions. Never tied them. Weight, appearance, results, more? I don't notice much difference between beaded nymphs and using split shot as far as fishing goes, *BUT* it's much easier and faster to switch from beaded nymphs to dry when a hatch starts poppin'. Why is that? You just cut off thew nymph and slide off the weight? Not too hard. The split shot I've used has either a tendency to slide around on the tippet if too loose, or cause abrasion to the tippet if tight enough to stay put. Maybe I'm not doing something right. Ideas? -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Living with shooting heads | Peter Charles | Fly Fishing | 14 | July 14th, 2004 06:43 AM |