One for the legal eagles...

"Jeff Miller" wrote in message
newsIxXe.27182$hp.18722@lakeread08...
Wolfgang wrote:

"Jeff Miller" wrote in message
news:5YZWe.26324$hp.19936@lakeread08...


...i'd not counsel compromising or losing one's principles and integrity
by assuming the same repugnant characteristics despised in the other
person...


Then, pray tell, what purpose or meaning can possibly adhere to
participating in discussions in ROFF?

Wolfgang
who begins to sense life's raison d'etre slipping away as inexorably as
its quickly diminishing remaining moments.



but, there are moral compasses spinning about seeking "true" guidance in
even less worthy venues, eh?

Well, that's a real poser. Hm......less worthy venues......the mind reels!


and...as i continue to sort through yesterday's offerings, i trust i shall
soon discover a recounting of your adventures in the "true north"?

Not just yet, I'm afraid. I have a couple of things I need to get caught up
on. I'll try to have something written up later today or tomorrow morning.

For now, just a teaser. Upstream is not the way to go on the
Sturgeon.........

Wolfgang

Wolfgang wrote:

"Jeff Miller" wrote in message

For now, just a teaser. Upstream is not the way to go on the
Sturgeon.........


fewer mosquitoes downstream?

jeff

Jeff could have answered that one without the benefit of Law School, I
think.

bruce h

isn't a check nothing more than a promise to pay?

"riverman" wrote in news:1126978035.272239.98130
@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

Can the customer say "ha! I gave you a valid
check, my responsbility ended there. You lost it, you eat it."



Only if the customer didn't care what people thought of him.

If I were the customer, I'd offer to repay, less the fee for stopping the
check.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply