A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dual nymphs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 08:54 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Mike[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,426
Default Dual nymphs

On May 2, 9:45 pm, Scott Seidman wrote:

When you've got two flies separated by 24" or so, there's a greater
likelihood that at least one of them will be in the right place at the
right time. Even for those who have experience, depth variations in the
streams are easier to deal with when you have two nymphs.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply


Not logical to assume that. Indeed, if you use two nymphs, it is far
more likely that at least one will definitely be in the wrong place
most of the time, and is thus superfluous. If the bottom nymph is
dragging on the bottom, it will keep giving false bite indications as
well.

If you want to use two nymphs, fine. I donīt mind, hell, you can use
ten if you like.

TL
MC
  #12  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 08:56 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Scott Seidman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,037
Default Dual nymphs

Mike wrote in news:89e09b57-d515-4811-80d2-
:

Not logical to assume that.


No need to assume anything that hours of field testing verifies.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply
  #13  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 09:03 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Mike[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,426
Default Dual nymphs

On May 2, 9:56 pm, Scott Seidman wrote:
Mike wrote in news:89e09b57-d515-4811-80d2-
:

Not logical to assume that.


No need to assume anything that hours of field testing verifies.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply


If you tried fishing in the water, at the correct depth, then you
might change your mind. No matter how many hours you test a two nymph
rig in a field, neither of the nymphs will be in the best place for
catching a fish.

If you do fish in the water, and have no idea of the water depth, then
using two flies is not going to change that. Regardless of the depth
you set, you only have two possibilities. Either both flies are in
the wrong place. or one fly is in the wrong place.

At least if you use only one fly, you canīt have two flies in the
wrong place.

TL
MC
  #14  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 09:19 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Dave LaCourse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,492
Default Dual nymphs

On Fri, 02 May 2008 17:05:09 GMT, notbob wrote:

.....no, not hot big-boobed babes drooling over your rig!

I'm having no luck tossing out my lone oversized dry BWO (#12). OTOH, I've
improved my casting immensely. In light of that fact, I actually broke down
and spent big bucks on 3 flies from my local premier FF shop. The guy on
duty seemed to know his flies, but didn't know the basic nX equation for
tippets, so I'm not sure of any advice he offered other than to rig 'em as a
pair. So, the question is, what's the best way to rig a dual nymph
offering. I have a BH pheasant and a Dunn's emerger. I also got a hotwire
prince, but I figure that's a solo rig. What say ye? TIA

nb


What? No pheasant tail? Try nymphing with just one nymph as others
have suggested. I'm a pretty good nympher and never fail to take fish
using that method, and I seldom, if ever, use more than one.

You can use more than one without getting tangles by simply using a
circle cast - when your fly drifts past and below you on the stream,
simply pick up the line and lob it upstream without any false casting.

But, you really should learn how to nymph and cast better before you
attempt a 2 nymph rig. I have seen some very experienced fishermen
untangling their dual fly rigs.

Break down and buy a couple of pheasant tails in size 18. You won't
regret your purchase.

Dave


  #15  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 09:28 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,808
Default Dual nymphs

On Fri, 2 May 2008 13:03:36 -0700 (PDT), Mike
wrote:

On May 2, 9:56 pm, Scott Seidman wrote:
Mike wrote in news:89e09b57-d515-4811-80d2-
:

Not logical to assume that.


No need to assume anything that hours of field testing verifies.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply


If you tried fishing in the water,


Like in a bowl...?

at the correct depth,


OK, how big is the bowl...?

then you might change your mind.


Yeah, anything is possible...

No matter how many hours you test a two nymph
rig in a field, neither of the nymphs will be in the best place for
catching a fish.


Testing proves it...

If you do fish in the water,


A soup bowl? A salad bowl? A trainstation toilet bowl?

and have no idea of the water depth, then
using two flies is not going to change that.


But one is better than side-scan sonar...

Regardless of the depth you set, you only have two possibilities.


Dumb and dumber?

Either both flies are in the wrong place.


One in the bowl and one in Dieter's mouth...?

or one fly is in the wrong place.


Well, if anyone ought to know about the wrong place for his fly, it'd be
you...

At least if you use only one fly, you canīt have two flies in the
wrong place.


Sure you can - one in the bowl and one in Dieter...

TL
MC


HTH,
Dickie
  #16  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 09:31 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,808
Default Dual nymphs

On Fri, 02 May 2008 16:19:24 -0400, Dave LaCourse
wrote:

On Fri, 02 May 2008 17:05:09 GMT, notbob wrote:

.....no, not hot big-boobed babes drooling over your rig!

I'm having no luck tossing out my lone oversized dry BWO (#12). OTOH, I've
improved my casting immensely. In light of that fact, I actually broke down
and spent big bucks on 3 flies from my local premier FF shop. The guy on
duty seemed to know his flies, but didn't know the basic nX equation for
tippets, so I'm not sure of any advice he offered other than to rig 'em as a
pair. So, the question is, what's the best way to rig a dual nymph
offering. I have a BH pheasant and a Dunn's emerger. I also got a hotwire
prince, but I figure that's a solo rig. What say ye? TIA

nb


What? No pheasant tail? Try nymphing with just one nymph as others
have suggested. I'm a pretty good nympher and never fail to take fish
using that method, and I seldom, if ever, use more than one.

You can use more than one without getting tangles by simply using a
circle cast - when your fly drifts past and below you on the stream,
simply pick up the line and lob it upstream without any false casting.


Um, why would one false cast a nymph (or a nymph rig)?

Curious,
R

But, you really should learn how to nymph and cast better before you
attempt a 2 nymph rig. I have seen some very experienced fishermen
untangling their dual fly rigs.

Break down and buy a couple of pheasant tails in size 18. You won't
regret your purchase.

Dave

  #17  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 09:38 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Mike[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,426
Default Dual nymphs

On May 2, 10:31 pm, wrote:

Um, why would one false cast a nymph (or a nymph rig)?

Curious,
R


Since you are certainly the most persistent tosser present, why donīt
you tell us?

MC
  #18  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 09:39 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Mike[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,426
Default Dual nymphs

False tosser to boot.
  #19  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 09:49 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,808
Default Dual nymphs

On Fri, 2 May 2008 13:38:46 -0700 (PDT), Mike
wrote:

On May 2, 10:31 pm, wrote:

Um, why would one false cast a nymph (or a nymph rig)?

Curious,
R


Since you are certainly the most persistent tosser present, why donīt
you tell us?

MC

Um, because you like big rough men with big rough hands to plug you up
the poopshoot...? I know it has nothing to do with fishing or the
question, but since it's why you do EVERYTHING you do, it would be why
you'd do it, at least...

Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know...you're calling a big rough man with big rough
hands,
Dickie
  #20  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 10:09 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Mike[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,426
Default Dual nymphs

On May 2, 10:49 pm, wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2008 13:38:46 -0700 (PDT), Mike

wrote:
On May 2, 10:31 pm, wrote:


Um, why would one false cast a nymph (or a nymph rig)?


Curious,
R


Since you are certainly the most persistent tosser present, why donīt
you tell us?


MC


Um, because you like big rough men with big rough hands to plug you up
the poopshoot...? I know it has nothing to do with fishing or the
question, but since it's why you do EVERYTHING you do, it would be why
you'd do it, at least...

Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know...you're calling a big rough man with big rough
hands,
Dickie


Really quite amusing, observing ( I would have written "watching",
but it seems there are plenty of others doing that), a Dick behaving
like an asshole. Not at all surprising that you seem to be obsessed by
them.

Why donīt you try screwing yourself? Could be your true destiny, and
you are doubtless the only person who is ever goinjg to love you
anyway.

MC
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Dual Gas Tanks Steveo Bass Fishing 5 August 16th, 2007 02:32 AM
Dual Fly Combos? Padishar Creel Fly Fishing 14 April 4th, 2007 04:08 PM
Single or Dual Console? Bubba Bass Fishing 13 May 25th, 2005 03:45 AM
Dual Sonar question... Charles Summers Bass Fishing 13 April 30th, 2004 02:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.