Apologies

On Aug 9, 10:45*pm, "Tom Littleton" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Gentlemen, and especially Mr Fortenberry.

It seems I owe you all an apology. I have apparently been operating in
an environment I thought I understood, but in actual fact is so far
outside my actual terms of reference that I merely made myself look
stupid, and was simply unaware of a number of things which you
apparently see as normal.

Please accept my most humble and sincere apologies for any distress I
may have caused you as a result of my ignorance.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Mike Connor

It seems that you refuse to learn from past mistakes, so just post this as
frequently as you need to, Mike.
Seriously, what, honestly, do you think you are accomplishing? From my
perspective, and it would seem many others, what harm that has been done to
your "reputation"(something you seem to trumpet yourself, which as I have
pointed out to LaCourse makes such claims hollow) is entirely
self-inflicted. Not one person with reading skills or the cognitive ability
of an English Spaniel believed any of the stuff regarding sexual preference,
train stations, lederhosen, etc. My comments regarding you changing ISPs and
speculating why MAY have been wrong, but who freaking cared?You, on the
other hand have provided enough evidence to the planet that you are an
unstable loon, thin-skinned, overvaluing his own worth to the sport of Fly
Fishing, and above all selfish enough to disrupt all to 'punish' a few.
Thanks a bunch for ruining what good thoughts many once had of you, but the
culprit behind the downfall is facing you every morning in the mirror.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Tom

How curious you are. I don´t NEED to post anything at all here, and I
simply refrained from doing so for a very long time.

You people have lied, defamed, and harassed me, just because you feel
like it.

It is not my place to "punish" anybody for anything, I have no doubt
that the laws of your country will see to that.It is also likely that
your providers will take action to prevent you misusing their services
again.

You have no right to insult defame and harass people on a public
newsgroup. Despite my trying every possible way to stop you lying,
harassing, and defaming me, you simply refused to do so.

Some of you encouraged others to send me harassing e-mail, others are
calling me a Nazi, a homo, and who knows what else, and this is all
somehow my fault? Even now you continue to ridicule and defame me

Now that I am taking steps to defend myself against your ( in the
meantime admitted) lies and defamation, you start whining, and
continue to harass and defame me.

You should simply have kept your mouth shut. Apparently you couldn´t,
you still can not, and you are now reaping the consequences.

I don´t care what happens to you or anybody else, or this group. You
have done your level best to coerce, ridicule and browbeat me, all in
public to a massive audience, and you have failed.

You have very severely damaged my reputation, because there are some
people who will believe the lies you have written regardless of what
happens to you.

In your case apparently, your reason for doing all this is because you
don´t like my opinions on fly-fishing. Don´t you think that´s a
little strange?

I don´t even feel sorry for you. Anything else you write merely serves
to incriminate you further.

You are guilty of a federal crime, cyber harassment. It makes no
difference what you write here now, the crime has been committed.

Were I in your unfortunate position, I would simply keep my mouth
shut, and hope that all I lose is an internet provider.

I can´t stop you posting this or any other rubbish, but other people
can, and they will, that´s what the FBI and various justice
departments are for, to ensure that criminals like you are prevented
from committing various crimes, and also punishing you for those you
have already committed.

It doesn´t make any difference what I think about it, so there is no
point in you addressing me with your whinging.

You should have thought of the consequences before you misbehaved in
public.

Mike Connor

http://www.mike1.bplaced.net/Wikka/HomePage

wrote in message
...
You have very severely damaged my reputation, because there are some
people who will believe the lies you have written regardless of what
happens to you.

How the freaking hell has anything I've said 'severely damaged' your
reputation. By the way, do NOT misread what I said. AFAIK, you have had
repercussions in the past, due to your conduct online, and have never proven
otherwise to me. I stated my feelings. Still, to get back to topic, what
have I done to your reputation, in comparison to your own childish, churlish
conduct?

In your case apparently, your reason for doing all this is because you
don´t like my opinions on fly-fishing. Don´t you think that´s a
little strange?

completely wrong, here....I tried, actually, to defend you on a couple other
sites because I had valued some of your opinions on fly fishing. I've never
had a beef with your angling insights, not that I agreed completely, but
opinions are expected to vary. My only argument with you, Mike, is your
constant childish behavior and arrogant assertion of your own importance.

for the record, NOTHING you have ever done or said has had any negative
impact on me, EVER. Nor, would I ever expect that to change, as I have done
nothing wrong.
Apparently, the whole world, save you, has figured that out.
Tom

On Aug 9, 11:35*pm, "Tom Littleton" wrote:
wrote in message

...You have very severely damaged my reputation, because there are some

people who will believe the lies you have written regardless of what

happens to you.

How the freaking hell has anything I've said 'severely damaged' your
reputation. By the way, do NOT misread what I said. AFAIK, you have had
repercussions in the past, due to your conduct online, and have never proven
otherwise to me. I stated my feelings. Still, to get back to topic, what
have I done to your reputation, in comparison to your own childish, churlish
conduct?

In your case apparently, your reason for doing all this is because you

don´t like my opinions on fly-fishing. *Don´t you think that´s a

little strange?

completely wrong, here....I tried, actually, to defend you on a couple other
sites because I had valued some of your opinions on fly fishing. I've never
had a beef with your angling insights, not that I agreed completely, but
opinions are expected to vary. My only argument with you, Mike, is your
constant childish behavior and arrogant assertion of *your own importance.

for the record, NOTHING you have ever done or said has had any negative
impact on me, EVER. Nor, would I ever expect that to change, as I have done
nothing wrong.
Apparently, the whole world, save you, has figured that out.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Tom

Mr.Littleton, I am not interested in why you do anything at all, or in
discussing it with you. I merely wish you to stop defaming and
harassing me in public.

If you had done nothing wrong, you would not be posting this rubbish
to me in an effort to vindicate yourself.

There is nothingI can do for you. I have no wish to discuss anything
at all with you, and regardless of what you post here I will not reply
to you or anybody else again.

Mike Connor

http://www.mike1.bplaced.net/Wikka/HomePage

wrote:
snip
You have no right to insult defame and harass people on a public
newsgroup. ...

You cannot be "harassed" in the legal sense on a Usenet newsgroup.
Your presence here is totally voluntary so how in the hell can
you be harassed ? Just leave already.

One can be "harassed" in the legal sense via email but not on a
Usenet newsgroup. You might want to make a note of that as you
seem to have forgotten it since the last time you had issues with
your ISP.

--
Ken Fortenberry

wrote:
snip
I have no wish to discuss anything
at all with you, and regardless of what you post here I will not reply
to you or anybody else again.

Promises, promises.

I'll toss a buck into the Loony Mike Returns pool for day 96.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Sat, 9 Aug 2008 14:23:54 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

You are guilty of a federal crime, cyber harassment. It makes no
difference what you write here now, the crime has been committed.

Were I in your unfortunate position, I would simply keep my mouth
shut, and hope that all I lose is an internet provider.

I can´t stop you posting this or any other rubbish, but other people
can, and they will, that´s what the FBI and various justice
departments are for, to ensure that criminals like you are prevented
from committing various crimes, and also punishing you for those you
have already committed.

Just the FBI? You're letting them off WAAAAAY too easily...may I
suggest:

http://tinyurl.com/6p5d9c

....and remember, make sure to spell "mother****er" correctly in your
explanation...

It doesn´t make any difference what I think about it, so there is no
point in you addressing me with your whinging.

You should have thought of the consequences before you misbehaved in
public.

Yeah, as soon as the jockeying to see which AUSA gets to handle this
career-maker is over, FBI agents oughta be swarming throughout the world
to apprehend all of the ROFFian consequence-ignorers...I can hardly wait
for the "inspired by a true story" movie...the "Star Wars kid" will play
you as a youth, Nathan Lane will play you as an adul...well, the aged
version of you, and I sorta see a dumbed-down Larry the Cable Guy (or
maybe Erik Estrada) playing the soon-to-be-ex-FBI agent who took your
complaint to USA's office...

HTH,
R

Mike Connor

PS - Ya know, FWIW, you really don't need to sign your posts...

wrote in message
...

PS - Ya know, FWIW, you really don't need to sign your posts...

This is sort of what I was getting at, just stated in a much more succinct
fashion.
Tom

wrote in message
...
...I can hardly wait
for the "inspired by a true story" movie...the "Star Wars kid" will play
you as a youth, Nathan Lane will play you as an adul...well, the aged
version of you, and I sorta see a dumbed-down Larry the Cable Guy (or
maybe Erik Estrada) playing the soon-to-be-ex-FBI agent who took your
complaint to USA's office...

no way Nathan Lane touches that role. Perhaps Sean Hayes needs the work and
could handle the childhood and older Mikes for the same salary, with a
little makeup work. Estrada is truly an inspired pick for the agent. If John
Waters could direct, Mike might be able to pay for that Internationally
Renowned website out of royalties. If he could just behave and be
restrained, maybe Waters could let him be key grip or something around the
set......
Tom

On Sat, 9 Aug 2008 14:23:54 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

You should simply have kept your mouth shut. Apparently you couldn´t,
you still can not, and you are now reaping the consequences.

What consequences, Mike? Consequences? There are no consequences.
Most of us were laughing at you, then we were shaking our heads, and
now we are feeling sorry for you. You are not well, Mike. A rational
person does not act the way you have for the past week or so.

As far as consequences: there are none for anyone on roff or
wherever. None! Why? Because no laws were broken. You are calling
up the FBI because we are laughing at you? Now you will have THEM
laughing at you.

Go away, Mike. You have no fun here, there is nothing for you here,
so your exit would be advantagious for all concerned.

Davey

On Sat, 9 Aug 2008 14:44:44 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

There is nothingI can do for you. I have no wish to discuss anything
at all with you, and regardless of what you post here I will not reply
to you or anybody else again.

How many times have you said that before, Mike. Fifty? Sixty?