![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Ken Fortenberry wrote: I don't *want* to see them bailed out either, but I don't think there's really any choice. Now is not the time to lose one out of every ten jobs in the country. It's a damn shame and a bitter pill to swallow but we can't let the Big 3 go belly up no matter how much they richly deserve it. However, the moment the government puts one penny of my tax dollar into that mess I want a clean sweep. That means fire every damn executive in the company, tear up the union contracts, void all deals with suppliers, tell the shareholders "tough ****, you got nothin'", and turn the whole thing over to government receivership with the intention of making the company viable and once again publicly owned ASAP. My two centavos. Damn you are making a ton of sense. Usually you are just a asshole to people. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what a stupid idea to bail out a dying business....
On Nov 18, 12:12*pm, "Larry L" wrote: One of the great things about ROFF is that I can spout off about things I don't know much about *.... and fit right in G I, personally, don't want to see GM 'bailed out' *via my money. * Let 'em go BK and restructure. * Their business model is dead ... bury the damn corpse, don't keep it on a heart lung machine pretending it's still alive YOMV |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 12:45*pm, "~^ beancounter ~^"
wrote: SNIP So your bet is billions for the bankers and zip for American workers? So maybe you have some suggestions on where the US companies that sell the largest share of of their plastics, chemicals, electronics, rubber, and steel to the US auto manufacturers should sell their production, when they go into the ground BECAUSE foreign autos are subsidised by a $1000 or more a vehicle, and BECAUSE foreign owned plants do not have retiree pensions to pay, or health care costs at their off shore plants? Sure, lets hollow out even more of our industrial capacity. Thats the failed Wingnut Republican economic plan. Maybe we can say **** you to all American workers, issue each family an illegal worker, and pretend our stock portfolios represent actual wealth. No thanx. I'll keep my bet on America, its people, it's land, its enterprise, my kids and my grand kids. Dave Ideology still sucks |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DaveS" wrote in message ... On Nov 18, 12:45 pm, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote: SNIP So your bet is billions for the bankers and zip for American workers? So maybe you have some suggestions on where the US companies that sell the largest share of of their plastics, chemicals, electronics, rubber, and steel to the US auto manufacturers should sell their production, when they go into the ground BECAUSE foreign autos are subsidised by a $1000 or more a vehicle, and BECAUSE foreign owned plants do not have retiree pensions to pay, or health care costs at their off shore plants? Sure, lets hollow out even more of our industrial capacity. Thats the failed Wingnut Republican economic plan. Maybe we can say **** you to all American workers, issue each family an illegal worker, and pretend our stock portfolios represent actual wealth. No thanx. I'll keep my bet on America, its people, it's land, its enterprise, my kids and my grand kids. Dave Ideology still sucks One of the big things is that the pension and health care system was paid for by the cost of the new cars...What Union in their right mind would not want a pension system funded by investments rather than the word of the boss? Couple that with a failure to foresee the future and....what a minute...didn't some Nobel prize guy write a paper called 'The Looting of America?" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:12:28 GMT, "Larry L"
wrote: One of the great things about ROFF is that I can spout off about things I don't know much about .... and fit right in G I, personally, don't want to see GM 'bailed out' via my money. Let 'em go BK and restructure. Their business model is dead ... bury the damn corpse, don't keep it on a heart lung machine pretending it's still alive YOMV They made their deals with the unions. Now let them live with it. Do you think the unions would give up 1 cent to help the big three automakers. No way. The stupid spineless ceos have let the unions run rough shod over them for as long as I can remember. AND, Detroit makes crap to boot. I have been employed since I was 12. Paid my taxes on time. Always have paid my bills and have paid my own way since I was 18. There are millions of folks just like me. We have had two or three mortgages in our lifetimes and have never missed a payment. Most of the same people have saved for their future so they will not become a dredge on society. I have been saving since I was a E4 in the Navy, making but a few dollars every week just so I would not be a dredge on society. Many of us have served our country faithfully. and some of us still are. Why the hell should MY taxes, OUR taxes, go to bail out ANYTHING? I should think that those good taxpayers who have never defaulted on a loan, have never cheated anyone, have been faithful to their mortgage payments and to their government deserve to be "bailed out" a helluva lot more that the automakers, aig, or any of the banks. Screw 'em if they can't keep up. Screw the unions, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, et al. And before you open your yap, Ken, eff you too. Dave |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave LaCourse" wrote in message ... On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:12:28 GMT, "Larry L" wrote: One of the great things about ROFF is that I can spout off about things I don't know much about .... and fit right in G I, personally, don't want to see GM 'bailed out' via my money. Let 'em go BK and restructure. Their business model is dead ... bury the damn corpse, don't keep it on a heart lung machine pretending it's still alive YOMV They made their deals with the unions. Now let them live with it. Do you think the unions would give up 1 cent to help the big three automakers. No way. The stupid spineless ceos have let the unions run rough shod over them for as long as I can remember. AND, Detroit makes crap to boot. I have been employed since I was 12. Paid my taxes on time. Always have paid my bills and have paid my own way since I was 18. There are millions of folks just like me. We have had two or three mortgages in our lifetimes and have never missed a payment. Most of the same people have saved for their future so they will not become a dredge on society. I have been saving since I was a E4 in the Navy, making but a few dollars every week just so I would not be a dredge on society. Many of us have served our country faithfully. and some of us still are. Why the hell should MY taxes, OUR taxes, go to bail out ANYTHING? I should think that those good taxpayers who have never defaulted on a loan, have never cheated anyone, have been faithful to their mortgage payments and to their government deserve to be "bailed out" a helluva lot more that the automakers, aig, or any of the banks. Screw 'em if they can't keep up. Screw the unions, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, et al. And before you open your yap, Ken, eff you too. Dave Dave you ol' pirate... You are being just a little too hard on the unions - you exhibit the behavior of one who always wanted a union but never had one... I worked for the 'guvner' and had a union and am glad I did...to the point. But I do agree that some glaring, obvious mistakes were made...non funded pension plans, lack of market competition...and so forth ....but they only thing to blame is the love of mamon...or is in mammon....anyhow, if you get it fresh at the farmers market it's not too bad... john |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:59:48 -0800, "asadi"
wrote: Dave you ol' pirate... You are being just a little too hard on the unions - you exhibit the behavior of one who always wanted a union but never had one... I worked for the 'guvner' and had a union and am glad I did...to the point. But I do agree that some glaring, obvious mistakes were made...non funded pension plans, lack of market competition...and so forth John, I grew up with unions. Every kid in my neighborhood had a father or mother working for the unions. Westinghouse in East Springfield was the big employer. My dad was a Teamster and HAD to belong to the union or he didn't work. Today the state is a right to work state. It wasn't then. My dad got absolutely nothing from the Teamsters except a pin each year saying how many safe miles he'd driven. They took his money and gave him a pin. Who benefited from all that dues? Hoffa and his hacks. Not my dad. Westinghouse would go on strike every Nov/Dec. They'd be unemployed for five or six weeks and finally settle the strike for pennies more/hour. I can remember my dad shaking his head and calling them fools. The only people that made out were the union bigwigs. The little people certainly didn't. I have hated the unions ever since. I've never worked for a union shop (thankfully), but I have had to do business with them when I worked for Honeywell Electro Ops (infra red dectectors). I worked on the AN/AAD5 FLIR and had to take a couple of units to a factory in a nearby town for vibration testing. What a cluster **** that was. What would have taken me two maybe three hours to do took TWO days by these union heehaws. It brought back memories from my childhood. Glad you liked/needed them. Guess that's why we have chocolate and vanilla. If GM can renegotiate the union contracts, get rid of the ridiculous "job bank", build a better product at lower cost than Toyota, Nissan, Honda, Subaru, Hyndai, and yes, even Kia, they may survive after restructuring. But right now, they need to be shot and put out of their misery. They shoot horses, don't they? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 22-Nov-2008, Dave LaCourse wrote: If GM can renegotiate the union contracts, get rid of the ridiculous "job bank", build a better product at lower cost than Toyota, Nissan, Honda, Subaru, Hyndai, and yes, even Kia, they may survive after restructuring. But right now, they need to be shot and put out of their misery. They shoot horses, don't they? The foreign auto makers are so far superior to the GM autos that there is no way, in this lifetime , i would ever by another US built Ford or GM We buy Toyotas IWe have a 1997 Ford F250 pickup as a farm vehicle Not the best even when it was new! We will buy a Tundra when this dies. Good riddance to GM A bailout? A total waste of money anda crime perpertrated upon the US taxpayer! The unions esp the UAW have long ago sold out and become ineffective and even counter productuve If this happens I will secede forom the union IMP This is the kind of industry that should go to foreign shores Fred |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:32:38 GMT, "Fred"
wrote: This is the kind of industry that should go to foreign shores Whoooooa, big hoss. Don't say that. Fortenberry and Barnard will never speak to you again. d;o) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry L" wrote in
: One of the great things about ROFF is that I can spout off about things I don't know much about .... and fit right in G I, personally, don't want to see GM 'bailed out' via my money. Let 'em go BK and restructure. Their business model is dead ... bury the damn corpse, don't keep it on a heart lung machine pretending it's still alive YOMV If you think a tax increase on those making more than $250K will damper the economy, wait until 10% more of American jobs start getting squishy. This is probably the wrong time to be letting them go. Even if we can keep them viable for 18 more months, it might well be worth it. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Bush Bailout Plan | riverman | Fly Fishing | 8 | October 1st, 2008 06:54 PM |
The Big Bailout (OT, or not) | riverman | Fly Fishing | 15 | September 28th, 2008 02:57 PM |